| Author |
Message |
|
SolC9
Forum General
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
|
 Re: 2007 NFL Discussion I can't believe only 4 Packers are going to the Pro Bowl.
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:53 pm |
 
|
|
|
SolC9
Forum General
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Levy wrote: Holmgren should have challenged that catch, it hit the ground It was close, I think he would have lost the challenge because there wasn't a clear view.
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:55 pm |
|
|
|
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion SolC9 wrote: I can't believe only 4 Packers are going to the Pro Bowl. Yeah, the Pro Bowl spots are a bit nutty this year. Lots of teams over-and underrepresented
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:57 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Levy wrote: Holmgren should have challenged that catch, it hit the ground He caught it, and when he went to the ground you could not see if his hands were under the ball, but he did have control throughout, so it would have been a wasted challenge. _________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:57 pm |
|
|
|
SolC9
Forum General
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Last edited by SolC9 on Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:59 pm |
|
|
|
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion PLAY OF THE YEAR! OH MY GOD!!!!
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:59 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Oh Brett! You silly old man!
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:01 pm |
|
|
|
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Haha, what a play. Only Favre.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:02 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Seattle only has 85 yards...  They had one good drive so far. The only reason they're in the game is because of 2 costly mistakes by Grant... who you can't really blame, they were good defensive plays. _________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:06 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion If GB plays Dallas in the Finals... they better match up Woodson against TO...
Because Harris failed last time, even though he's playing great right now.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:23 pm |
|
|
|
SolC9
Forum General
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion They won't have to worry about TO. They'll be playing the Giants 
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:29 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion SolC9 wrote: They won't have to worry about TO. They'll be playing the Giants They have a 50% chance of playing the Giants... I give both the Cowboys and Giants an even chance at winning... But I just hope it's physical, so GB can ROLL. _________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:31 pm |
|
|
|
SolC9
Forum General
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Munkatouille wrote: SolC9 wrote: They won't have to worry about TO. They'll be playing the Giants They have a 50% chance of playing the Giants... I give both the Cowboys and Giants an even chance at winning... But I just hope it's physical, so GB can ROLL. Well, let's make sure the Pack wins this one first...
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:33 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Seattle needs to draft a RB... BADLY.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:38 pm |
|
|
|
SolC9
Forum General
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Wow is the snow coming down now! 
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:40 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Pollard was too busy trying to stay inbounds than worry about catching it.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:41 pm |
|
|
|
SolC9
Forum General
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Wow, after fumbling his first two touches, Grant has rushed for the most yards of any GB RB in the playoffs ever. 
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:52 pm |
|
|
|
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22182
Location: Places
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Love the snow
Btw Grant is a beast; he has been for the last 2 months but wow hes putting on a show
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:54 pm |
|
|
|
SolC9
Forum General
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion  I was wondering if one of the Packers was going to throw a snowball at a teammate. AWESOME!
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 7:56 pm |
|
|
|
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40287
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion I thought Seattle was supposed to have good defence? Grant is putting it right in their asses. _________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:01 pm |
|
|
|
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Seattle is undersized, but quick, a physical team can give them fits.
_________________
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 8:11 pm |
|
|
|
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion What a drive. Jacksonville is tough.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 10:05 pm |
|
|
|
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Oh well, Patriots' offense is unstoppable.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:16 pm |
|
|
|
Harry Warden
Orphan
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion Even though they will, in all likelyhood lose, you've gotta hand it to Jacksonville. They've hung tough. Garrard has had a very good game.
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:35 pm |
|
|
|
torrino
College Boy T
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
|
Re: 2007 NFL Discussion This is getting bad.
FUCK THE PATS.
|
| Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:44 pm |
|
|
