Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat May 17, 2025 1:27 am



Reply to topic  [ 2177 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 ... 88  Next
 2007 NFL Discussion 
Author Message
Romosexual!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am
Posts: 32582
Location: the last free city
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
Magnus wrote:
Levy wrote:
I don't like that at all. If two teams play in the same division, one is 15-1, the other 14-2 and both are at the top of their conference that would mean they could face each other as early as the divisional round? Shouldn't be that way. Same with home field advantage. Whoever has the better record should get it


In any league, division winners are given priority over wild-card. Baseball, basketball, and hockey all do the same thing.

It does have its flaws yes. But the reason for this is to place greater emphasis on division games, which cerantily is not a bad thing.


I agree it makes it tougher for the wild card teams. If you can't win your division you shouldn't get any breaks. So it looks like all the higher seeds should advance. The question is can any of the lower seeds win? The best case probably could be made for San Diego and then maybe the Giants, but I am not sure if either team could do it.


Best case goes to NYGiants. They'll give the Cowboys lots of trouble. I wouldn't be surprised if they won.

The Chargers will get eaten alive by the Colts now that they are alot healthier than they were
when they last played each other. Remember the only reason the Colts lost that game was cause
of the stupid kicker missing an easy fieldgoal. :disgust:

_________________
Is it 2028 yet?


Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:18 pm
Profile
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40287
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Magnus wrote:
Levy wrote:
I don't like that at all. If two teams play in the same division, one is 15-1, the other 14-2 and both are at the top of their conference that would mean they could face each other as early as the divisional round? Shouldn't be that way. Same with home field advantage. Whoever has the better record should get it


In any league, division winners are given priority over wild-card. Baseball, basketball, and hockey all do the same thing.

It does have its flaws yes. But the reason for this is to place greater emphasis on division games, which cerantily is not a bad thing.


Actually in basketball they slightly modified the rules last year, division winners are guaranteed at least top 4, but not 3. That way the best non-division winner isn't handicapped, they can still get the 2nd or 3rd seed if the best team is in their division. Also if the 5th seed gets a better record than a bad division winner in the 4th slot, they get home court advantage.

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:26 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
But NBA plays 82 games, and each team only plays teams of their own division 16 times, so the change of the rule makes sense. For NFL, I'm fine with the existing rule, since you only play 16 teams, 6 of which are against divisional opponents. That's pretty high percentage and makes each game more crucial.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:11 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
In this coming round, home teams win 78% of the time over the last 18? or so years.

Oh... and Tom Brady has NEVER lost a home playoff game.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Jan 09, 2008 8:11 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Rev wrote:
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
Magnus wrote:
Levy wrote:
I don't like that at all. If two teams play in the same division, one is 15-1, the other 14-2 and both are at the top of their conference that would mean they could face each other as early as the divisional round? Shouldn't be that way. Same with home field advantage. Whoever has the better record should get it


In any league, division winners are given priority over wild-card. Baseball, basketball, and hockey all do the same thing.

It does have its flaws yes. But the reason for this is to place greater emphasis on division games, which cerantily is not a bad thing.


I agree it makes it tougher for the wild card teams. If you can't win your division you shouldn't get any breaks. So it looks like all the higher seeds should advance. The question is can any of the lower seeds win? The best case probably could be made for San Diego and then maybe the Giants, but I am not sure if either team could do it.


Best case goes to NYGiants. They'll give the Cowboys lots of trouble. I wouldn't be surprised if they won.

The Chargers will get eaten alive by the Colts now that they are alot healthier than they were
when they last played each other. Remember the only reason the Colts lost that game was cause
of the stupid kicker missing an easy fieldgoal. :disgust:


Well the Chargers also did their best to lose that game. They should just give Tomlision the ball 30 times. He hard ran the ball the last time they played. They need to Gates to play to even have a chance though. As for the Cowboys, it really depends on Romo. If he plays like he did in his last playoff game things might not go easy, right now I say the Cowboys win. I am thinking all the higher seeds advance it will be the first time since 1994.


Wed Jan 09, 2008 9:51 pm
Profile WWW
Superman: The Movie
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21230
Location: Massachusetts
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Yeah, the only reason why the Colts made a run towards the end of that Chargers game was because Norv Turner had a very inept gameplan. For some reason he thought it was best to barely use the best runningback in the league to run out the clock. Instead he used a good at best quarterback who couldn't complete a pass to save his life.

In all honesty, Rivers shouldn't throw the ball more than 15 times this week. Then again, the Colts are probably expecting LT to run the ball nonstop, so they'll probably have to rely somewhat on Rivers having a good game.

In other words, the Chargers are fucked.

_________________
My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)

If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.


Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:16 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
This is just a little something to think about...

What was the main reason people thought the Colts would lose in last years playoffs?

Their run defense.

What is the main reason people think the Pats will lose in this years playoffs?

Their run defense.

Apparently people don't learn their lessons.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Thu Jan 10, 2008 8:46 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm
Posts: 11637
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
I don't think NE's run defense was that bad. The Colts had a worse one last year.


Thu Jan 10, 2008 11:06 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
We all knew Grant would be the decisive factor in this game


Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:54 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Nice drive Pack! :thumbsup:


Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:59 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Just a great drive orchestrated by Favre


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:03 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Well done Packers. :thumbsup: And well done Grant, showing a lot of poise in running well
after a horrible start. :thumbsup:


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:22 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Shut your cakehole Holmgren. The remeasurement was correct...


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:23 pm
Profile
Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
That's why the Packers were my lock. There just better, and there showing it.

_________________
Image


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:23 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Levy wrote:
Shut your cakehole Holmgren. The remeasurement was correct...


You're right. But I don't blame Holmgren for questioning it. It's his job.


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:24 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Turnover!


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:28 pm
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
I'm really surprised, I expected this to be a low-scoring affair


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:29 pm
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Green Bay takes the lead!


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:33 pm
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post 
Terrible tackling by Green Bay on this drive. The best tackle came against the punter :funny:

And did the announcer honestly just say "Shaun Alexander is running well today"? He has 6 yards on 6 attempt, you nutcase


Last edited by Levy on Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:43 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
SS Atari Bigby is playing great right now :thumbsup:


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:44 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
So far both offenses have been playing well, GB has been playing great on both sides of the ball.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:47 pm
Profile
Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Seattle has been more bailed out by turnovers than really playing well.

GB on the other hand has looked unstoppable.

_________________
Image


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:48 pm
Profile WWW
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
That was a late hit you blind zebra!


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:49 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Grant is a beast.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:50 pm
Profile
Golfaholic
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
Post Re: 2007 NFL Discussion
Holmgren should have challenged that catch, it hit the ground


Sat Jan 12, 2008 6:52 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 2177 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62 ... 88  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.