Fucking idiots. Who would fucking vote for this?

How does it make sense? You have no control over what your parents do. Why should you be punished for your idiot parents?

Stop being stupid.

But as he says, constitutional law comes from Supreme Court interpretation. And I don't see this Supreme Court interpreting the law in favor of Arizona.

The reason birth-right citizenship makes no sense, goes the argument, is that it encourages people to come to the country illegally and have a child and thus evade deportation.

For your second question, I am having trouble with the is/ought problem. How do you get from "no control over what your parents do" to "you should therefore be a U.S. citizen." Why shouldn't you therefore have the same citizenship as your parent and leave?

Finally, your third question answers your first question. You say "why should you be punished..." You assume that being deported with your parents is punishment, probably because it is generally to a place that is a lot crappier. That is almost certainly true and that is what encourages their parents to come here illegally, so that they are not sent back to a hell-hole.

Just popped in quickly on this, think you should get the same status as your parents or where they have a passport.

If the Parents are citizens, then the kids shouldn't be either.

These statements are polar opposites.

"All persons, born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States."

Okay, so how do illegal immigrants/their children constitute a class of people who are "subject to the jurisdiction thereof"/The United States?
Wouldn't they by law be subject to the jurisdiction of their country of origin?