Condi? What Do you think. Should she run for president?
| World of KJ https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| So in 2012 is the US ready for...... https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=46133 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | FILMO [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Condi? What Do you think. Should she run for president?
|
|
| Author: | FILMO [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Condi is gay? |
|
| Author: | Groaning [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
I think she has nice teeth. |
|
| Author: | Groucho [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
FILMO wrote: Condi is gay? One of those unconfirmed rumors that apparently everyone knows but no one will confirm. |
|
| Author: | FILMO [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Groucho wrote: FILMO wrote: Condi is gay? One of those unconfirmed rumors that apparently everyone knows but no one will confirm. Actually Condi beeing gay would make me so vote for here.....Imagine she becomes president and then she speaks to the people and after that she gives a hot wet tongue kiss in public to her girlfriend............God that would be so good! |
|
| Author: | FILMO [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
 Ok I didnt know that.....tough it looks always better on TV than in reality! Still.....Condi might get my support! |
|
| Author: | Groucho [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Condi teared up at Obama's election and talked about how proud and happy she was that he won. Yeah, that's gonna go over well with conservatives! http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/11/0 ... 41414.html |
|
| Author: | nghtvsn [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
I would have liked if she had been VP during the 2nd Bush term instead. Unfortunately since she's not married I don't see how she could get elected President. |
|
| Author: | Eagle [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Don't see it ever happening. |
|
| Author: | Cotton [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Yeah, and she's seriously lacking in the charisma department. I can't imagine anyone, let alone in the GOP, getting overly excited about her. |
|
| Author: | Groucho [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 3:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Cotton wrote: Yeah, and she's seriously lacking in the charisma department. I can't imagine anyone, let alone in the GOP, getting overly excited about her. It mostly shows how clueless the GOP is. "Oh the democrats fought between a black person and a woman? Well, we've got a black woman! We can't lose!!! All the democrats will vote for her too!!!!" |
|
| Author: | Corpse [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
I think she's made it clear she won't be running. Of course, it wouldnt be the first time someone said No to running, and later ended uo doing it, but I believe her. Besides, the REP will need a new face. |
|
| Author: | Groucho [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Corpse wrote: I think she's made it clear she won't be running. Of course, it wouldnt be the first time someone said No to running, and later ended uo doing it, but I believe her. Besides, the REP will need a new face. Yeah, that's really important. McCain looked ridiculous calling himself the agent of "change." The GOP needs a new face completely. |
|
| Author: | Jim Halpert [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Bobby Jindal |
|
| Author: | Groucho [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Jim Halpert wrote: Bobby Jindal He'd be a good start. So I hope they don't pick him! 
|
|
| Author: | misutaa [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
She won't run. and she won't win. She worked under Bush, the republicans need a new figure, which is what they are trying to make of Sarah Palin. |
|
| Author: | Tyler [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Jindal's a religious fanatic. Either the GOP moves to the center or it is the permanent boogeymen-lobbing party. And that's only going to work in diminishing circumstances if they don't get a new boogeyman. |
|
| Author: | FILMO [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 6:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
hm....forget Palin......Most likely she would face Obama again and then she has the image of the looser.....and the image of the wierdo bride thanks SNL. |
|
| Author: | Excel [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
I could defiently see Jindal being to republicans what Obama was to the country. He wouldnt beat Obama unless Barack really screws up, but he could get the nomination. |
|
| Author: | Mannyisthebest [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Ideally I would like a Eishenhower Republican, however those guys have been long gone to the Democrats. Charlie Crist??? He would at least take Florida from Obama for sure. Jindal may be a bit to the right to social values. However I think he could take the Appalachians away from Obama including NC. He would really bring out the conservatives. However if Obama is very popular like FDR, Regan or Clinton there will likely be a joke candidate like Walter Mondale or Bob Dole. I would say Jindal, Romey and Huckabee are the top three. |
|
| Author: | Excel [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
huckabee has no shot. romney should have been their nominee this year. they need to find their own jfk esque candidate. a white guy who does what obama can do, that is what itll take to take down obama. |
|
| Author: | Maverikk [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 10:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
The Dark Knight wrote: they need someone under 50 someone not completely insane someone with military exerience (First Gulf War) that's a winning candidate. A Bill Pullman from Independence Day type probably would be their best path. |
|
| Author: | Mannyisthebest [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
What! McCain was their best shot, Romney would have lost badly. McCain could have dominated the independent vote but he had to pick Sarah Palin and go AWOL during the financial crisis. If McCain picked a better VP, the race would have been 50-49 instead of 52-46 which really means nothing. No I think Obama is set like Clinton. Not a chance till 2016 and Imo they would have a great chance. |
|
| Author: | Beeblebrox [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Adalius Prime wrote: I could defiently see Jindal being to republicans what Obama was to the country. He wouldnt beat Obama unless Barack really screws up, but he could get the nomination. The problem with Jindal is that he solidifies the Republicans as a southern regional party that appeals only to southern religious conservatives. The only box he breaks out of there is that he's Indian. But Republicans will probably simply use it like they did gender and Palin. |
|
| Author: | Excel [ Wed Nov 05, 2008 11:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: So in 2012 is the US ready for...... |
Jindal wont win. Like I said, in order to defeat Obama in 2012 (assuming Obama doesnt totally flop), they need their own version of jfk. They need a young handsome white guy who has a common man approach. kind of like a male version of Palin except with more experience. maybe jay could help[ me but nobody really fits the bill that I can think of. Mannyisthebest wrote: Romney would have lost badly It woulda been damn hard for Obama to tie him to Bush. That combined with his excellent record of fiscal responsibility in this economy woulda made him the stronger of the 2 on. That would have made it very competitive. Quote: McCain could have dominated the independent vote but he had to pick Sarah Palin and go AWOL during the financial crisis. Palin atleast got his party excited about him. she hurt independets but he didnt even try to get them. Quote: If McCain picked a better VP, the race would have been 50-49 instead of 52-46 which really means nothing. nope. mccain had no message and was too erratic to possibly contend with Obama calm, cool, and collected approach. In the end Obama was clearly the stronger and more impressive of the 2 due how erratic mccain was. Quote: No I think Obama is set like Clinton. yup. Quote: Not a chance till 2016 and Imo they would have a great chance. not sure of that yet |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|