Author |
Message |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
 Wisconsin
The Wisconsin primary this Tuesday could be more important than it seems. If Hillary pulls out a win - and some polls show her ahead or even - the media will probably spin it as a big comeback because they want a close fight.
How do you see it affecting Obama's momentum if that happens?
We can also use this thread for results talk about it tomorrow.
|
Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:20 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Re: Wisconsin
dpeneds on the delegates. if they end up even with delegates, its still an obama victory.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Mon Feb 18, 2008 3:45 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Wisconsin
It's more important for Obama. If Hillary wins I think he's toast.
_________________
|
Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:44 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
 Re: Wisconsin
I'm not sure why he'd be toast. He's ahead of her nationally and in Texas and gaining fast in Ohio. Her only chance is to win big in both Ohio and Texas, not just win. A Wisconsin win would help her a little, mainly with media coverage, but it's debatable if it would help her enough. When it comes down to it, his supporters are more passionate than hers and he has more money.
This speech flap thing going on now, charges of plagiarism, is mixing things up though. It's interesting because she's been stealing Obama's lines for weeks.
|
Mon Feb 18, 2008 4:52 pm |
|
 |
Cotton
Some days I'm a super bitch
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:22 pm Posts: 6645
|
 Re: Wisconsin
She hasn't had any momentum for weeks now. A win in Wisconsin seems almost essential to give her a boost before March 4th.
|
Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:01 pm |
|
 |
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Archie Gates wrote: I'm not sure why he'd be toast. He's ahead of her nationally and in Texas and gaining fast in Ohio. Her only chance is to win big in both Ohio and Texas, not just win. A Wisconsin win would help her a little, mainly with media coverage, but it's debatable if it would help her enough. When it comes down to it, his supporters are more passionate than hers and he has more money.
This speech flap thing going on now, charges of plagiarism, is mixing things up though. It's interesting because she's been stealing Obama's lines for weeks. "She did it first!" that's Obama's camp's defense. lol
|
Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:48 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Re: Wisconsin
I woud insult, but I'll hold back out of pity for clinton suporters, because if things go the way they loko like they will.... No Hillary in 2008 
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Mon Feb 18, 2008 5:56 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Archie Gates wrote: I'm not sure why he'd be toast. He's ahead of her nationally and in Texas and gaining fast in Ohio. Her only chance is to win big in both Ohio and Texas, not just win. A Wisconsin win would help her a little, mainly with media coverage, but it's debatable if it would help her enough. When it comes down to it, his supporters are more passionate than hers and he has more money.
This speech flap thing going on now, charges of plagiarism, is mixing things up though. It's interesting because she's been stealing Obama's lines for weeks. You're wrong about the polls in Texas, as Obama is not leading, he is trailing. If Obama loses: Wisconsin Texas Ohio Pennsylvania He's done. He's probably in deep trouble even if he loses 3 outa the 4, and as of now, that's what it looks like will happen.
_________________
|
Mon Feb 18, 2008 6:00 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32634 Location: the last free city
|
 Re: Wisconsin
loyalfromlondon wrote: I live next door (literally) to the nearest polling location. My girl is going there first thing in the morning to cast her vote.  for Obama?
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Mon Feb 18, 2008 10:57 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Re: Wisconsin
eagle you dont understand. winning does not matter. its delegates.
and again, unless she wins big, she wont get the pldeged delegatres lead....which means the vast majority of the super delegates that are undecided will be heading toward obama.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 12:01 am |
|
 |
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Re-sign Randy! wrote: eagle you dont understand. winning does not matter. its delegates.
and again, unless she wins big, she wont get the pldeged delegatres lead....which means the vast majority of the super delegates that are undecided will be heading toward obama. Obama would have to win big for that as well. You can't discredit that she will have a significant number of delegates as well. It's not like obama will have 2000 and Hillary 1000. Super delegates will have to consider where Hillary won. If she sweeps the big, important states, they just can't go for Obama because of his momentum. While it's not the touchdown Hillary had hoped for before the primaries, it also isn't a decisive defeat. You should at least have the respect to wait until after 3/4 to start talking in clear absolutes.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:26 am |
|
 |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Re: Wisconsin
It's about winning, and it's about the delegates. For Hillary right now, winning is going to be more important. A win will show that she is still in this, helping her keep her Super Delegate support and giving her much needed momentum. And speaking of momentum. I'm surprised (if the polls are accurate) that she is still as high as she is. Having 0 wins since Super Tuesday is quite devestating, though she's managed to stay in this. This may come back to Obama not being able to finish her off, maybe lack of experience on the campaign trail. He should have won the nominated once he won Iowa, but he blew it. And he should have the nomination locked up a second time at this very moment. You don't get opportunities like this very often, so you really must capitalize on them. He has and he hasn't The media has done more than he has.
If he would win in Wisconsin (he really should), and I think it's Rhode Island, and sweep her once again....but end up losing either Ohio or Texas 3/4...and if I was a SuperDelegate, I would NOT support him. To me, that shows there is something signifitantly wrong with his campaign. Winning EVERY state for an entire month should be WAY more than enough to win every state after that, and to lock up the nomination. He seems to lack the balls needed to land the knock out shots.
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 3:59 am |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Re: Wisconsin
No Country for Sam wrote: Re-sign Randy! wrote: eagle you dont understand. winning does not matter. its delegates.
and again, unless she wins big, she wont get the pldeged delegatres lead....which means the vast majority of the super delegates that are undecided will be heading toward obama. Obama would have to win big for that as well. You can't discredit that she will have a significant number of delegates as well. It's not like obama will have 2000 and Hillary 1000. Super delegates will have to consider where Hillary won. If she sweeps the big, important states, they just can't go for Obama because of his momentum. While it's not the touchdown Hillary had hoped for before the primaries, it also isn't a decisive defeat. You should at least have the respect to wait until after 3/4 to start talking in clear absolutes. No they wont. Its not like if Hillary doesnt run, the democrats wont win California or something. If Obama runs, he'll take most if not all of the states Clinton took. HOWEVER, if Clinton runs, she will not take all the ones Barack took. The superdelegates will look at several things if its too close to call 1. Most TOTAL votes 2. Most PLEDGED delegates 3. Most TOTAL delegates 4. Most States 5. Size/importance of the state But i think the deciding factor will be...Who is in better position to beat John McCain? Obama takes all of em. Again, you cannot honestly tell me that if Obama has the popular vote by a margin of atleast 500,000 (right now it;s around 900,000) and most pledged delegates,thathe wont get the nomination. Superdelegates know that the people voting for Obama wont be voting for anybody else. All these young people....it'll be him or they wont vote while Obama will still take many of Clinton supporters because they are hardcore democrats who wont have Bush 2.0 in the office. Corpse wrote: It's about winning, and it's about the delegates. For Hillary right now, winning is going to be more important. A win will show that she is still in this, helping her keep her Super Delegate support and giving her much needed momentum. And speaking of momentum. I'm surprised (if the polls are accurate) that she is still as high as she is. Having 0 wins since Super Tuesday is quite devestating, though she's managed to stay in this. This may come back to Obama not being able to finish her off, maybe lack of experience on the campaign trail. He should have won the nominated once he won Iowa, but he blew it. And he should have the nomination locked up a second time at this very moment. You don't get opportunities like this very often, so you really must capitalize on them. He has and he hasn't The media has done more than he has.
If he would win in Wisconsin (he really should), and I think it's Rhode Island, and sweep her once again....but end up losing either Ohio or Texas 3/4...and if I was a SuperDelegate, I would NOT support him. To me, that shows there is something signifitantly wrong with his campaign. Winning EVERY state for an entire month should be WAY more than enough to win every state after that, and to lock up the nomination. He seems to lack the balls needed to land the knock out shots. How are you surprised shes still in it? Shes Hillary Clinton, she aint gonna leave. 2nd, theres no he coulda finsihed her off after Iowa, even if he had won new hampshire. You dont go from Golioth to David after 2 states. Obama has yet to finish her off for 2 reasons. 1. He isnt playing dirty. For many, Hillary is very easy to dislike but Obama has opted not to play that card. 2. She wont leave. For the good of her party, she should drop out if she doesnt get large victories in delegates from Texas and Ohio because if this huge push and media attention those 2 states are recieving about how they need to vote for her if she wants to continue...she needs to leave, but she wont.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:21 am |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Re-sign Randy! wrote: eagle you dont understand. winning does not matter. its delegates.
and again, unless she wins big, she wont get the pldeged delegatres lead....which means the vast majority of the super delegates that are undecided will be heading toward obama. This is simply flawed logic. If Hillary wins Texas, regardless of if she gains an overwhelming number of delegates, she still WON the state. There is nothing that says, anywhere, that if she doesn't win 'big' and take over the pledged delegate count that she won't win the Super Delegates. The Super Delegates have clearly broken almost 2-1 for Hillary before this little 10-0 run of Obama's. If Hillary wins TX, OH, and PA, they will continue to break for her, regardless of the pledged delegate count.
_________________
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:31 am |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Even if the superdelegates go for Hillary, there would have to be enough to tip the balance to her, and right now there isn't.
In other words, unless she wins Texas, Ohio, and Pennsylvania by huge margins, neither candidate will have enough delegates to win the nomination even with the superdelegates.
Which means, under the rules, there would have to be a convention in August, everyone would vote who they pledged to on the first ballot, and after that, anyone can change their vote.
That would be damned exciting, and I wish the convention were in May instead, but geez, if we don't have a candidate by August, it's really going to hurt the party.
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:12 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Re: Wisconsin
eagle, just about all of hillary super delegates endorsed her MONTHS ago. Nobodys been "breaking for her" since September.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 1:59 pm |
|
 |
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Re-sign Randy! wrote: eagle, just about all of hillary super delegates endorsed her MONTHS ago. Nobodys been "breaking for her" since September. um. that 21 y/o super delegate said on CNN yesterday he was still undecided. it's not like those who didn't pledge to her at the beginning have completely abandoned the idea of endorsing her.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:01 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Re: Wisconsin
No shit, but all those undecided are going to go for the ones with the most pledged delegates.
nancy pelosi says, it, most delegates say it, and most political analysts say it. Whoever wins the popular vote or the most pledged delegates will get the VAST majority of the super delegates.
Like I said, they will not go against the voters. PERIOD. They wont hand the nomination to someone with 1 million less votes. It WONT HAPPEN. Even if it is Hillary Clinton.
How hard is that to understand?
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:06 pm |
|
 |
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Re-sign Randy! wrote: No shit, but all those undecided are going to go for the ones with the most pledged delegates.
nancy pelosi says, it, most delegates say it, and most political analysts say it. Whoever wins the popular vote or the most pledged delegates will get the VAST majority of the super delegates.
Like I said, they will not go against the voters. PERIOD. They wont hand the nomination to someone with 1 million less votes. It WONT HAPPEN. Even if it is Hillary Clinton.
How hard is that to understand? Duh! Not disagreeing with you on the process. You just assume it's going to be Obama when it's all said and done. And you're about a week early to make such a prediction.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:11 pm |
|
 |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Re-sign Randy! wrote: No Country for Sam wrote: Re-sign Randy! wrote: eagle you dont understand. winning does not matter. its delegates.
and again, unless she wins big, she wont get the pldeged delegatres lead....which means the vast majority of the super delegates that are undecided will be heading toward obama. Obama would have to win big for that as well. You can't discredit that she will have a significant number of delegates as well. It's not like obama will have 2000 and Hillary 1000. Super delegates will have to consider where Hillary won. If she sweeps the big, important states, they just can't go for Obama because of his momentum. While it's not the touchdown Hillary had hoped for before the primaries, it also isn't a decisive defeat. You should at least have the respect to wait until after 3/4 to start talking in clear absolutes. No they wont. Its not like if Hillary doesnt run, the democrats wont win California or something. If Obama runs, he'll take most if not all of the states Clinton took. HOWEVER, if Clinton runs, she will not take all the ones Barack took. The superdelegates will look at several things if its too close to call 1. Most TOTAL votes 2. Most PLEDGED delegates 3. Most TOTAL delegates 4. Most States 5. Size/importance of the state But i think the deciding factor will be...Who is in better position to beat John McCain? Obama takes all of em. Again, you cannot honestly tell me that if Obama has the popular vote by a margin of atleast 500,000 (right now it;s around 900,000) and most pledged delegates,thathe wont get the nomination. Superdelegates know that the people voting for Obama wont be voting for anybody else. All these young people....it'll be him or they wont vote while Obama will still take many of Clinton supporters because they are hardcore democrats who wont have Bush 2.0 in the office. Corpse wrote: It's about winning, and it's about the delegates. For Hillary right now, winning is going to be more important. A win will show that she is still in this, helping her keep her Super Delegate support and giving her much needed momentum. And speaking of momentum. I'm surprised (if the polls are accurate) that she is still as high as she is. Having 0 wins since Super Tuesday is quite devestating, though she's managed to stay in this. This may come back to Obama not being able to finish her off, maybe lack of experience on the campaign trail. He should have won the nominated once he won Iowa, but he blew it. And he should have the nomination locked up a second time at this very moment. You don't get opportunities like this very often, so you really must capitalize on them. He has and he hasn't The media has done more than he has.
If he would win in Wisconsin (he really should), and I think it's Rhode Island, and sweep her once again....but end up losing either Ohio or Texas 3/4...and if I was a SuperDelegate, I would NOT support him. To me, that shows there is something signifitantly wrong with his campaign. Winning EVERY state for an entire month should be WAY more than enough to win every state after that, and to lock up the nomination. He seems to lack the balls needed to land the knock out shots. How are you surprised shes still in it? Shes Hillary Clinton, she aint gonna leave. 2nd, theres no he coulda finsihed her off after Iowa, even if he had won new hampshire. You dont go from Golioth to David after 2 states. Obama has yet to finish her off for 2 reasons. 1. He isnt playing dirty. For many, Hillary is very easy to dislike but Obama has opted not to play that card. 2. She wont leave. For the good of her party, she should drop out if she doesnt get large victories in delegates from Texas and Ohio because if this huge push and media attention those 2 states are recieving about how they need to vote for her if she wants to continue...she needs to leave, but she wont. After winning Iowa, he should have beat her easily in NH, thus locking up the nomination. But he or his campaign wasn't aggressive enough. It's not about playing dirty all the time, but how aggressive you are. But after Iowa he just kept blabbing about "Yes We Can", "Together, we can bring real change to America". And when I say Clinton is still in this, I'm not talking about her still being IN this, but actually having a shot at getting the nomination. While Clinton's empty words are being used to play politics, they do have truth. Obama almost never talks about the issues or anything. Almost all his speeches are about "Yes We Can". If you ask me where he stands on the Death Penalty, Abortion, or Illegal Immigration, I honestly couldn't give you full answers, and I follow politics more than your average Joe. The only thing I can fully answer where he stands in on Health Care (one of the biggest reasons I'm not supporting him) and Iraq. But I usually don't count Iraq since he wasn't around to vote for or against the war. It's very easy to say you wouldn't, and that you opposed it from the beginning. I do get tired of hearing the "Yes We Can" chants every time he is shown on the News. I think we get his point with that by now. Now, please start talking about how you plan to do all of this and where you stand on everything, except Iraq, for once.
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:09 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Corpse wrote: If you ask me where he stands on the Death Penalty, Abortion, or Illegal Immigration, I honestly couldn't give you full answers, and I follow politics more than your average Joe. http://www.barackobama.com/issues/Lots of answers to your questions there.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 5:45 pm |
|
 |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Archie Gates wrote: Corpse wrote: If you ask me where he stands on the Death Penalty, Abortion, or Illegal Immigration, I honestly couldn't give you full answers, and I follow politics more than your average Joe. http://www.barackobama.com/issues/Lots of answers to your questions there. Exactly. I want to him talk about them, not some website editor.
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:07 pm |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Corpse wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Corpse wrote: If you ask me where he stands on the Death Penalty, Abortion, or Illegal Immigration, I honestly couldn't give you full answers, and I follow politics more than your average Joe. http://www.barackobama.com/issues/Lots of answers to your questions there. Exactly. I want to him talk about them, not some website editor.He talked about quite a few of them at a Town Hall style meeting today in San Antonio. One of the San Antonio news sites had a live feed of it. He actually explained things pretty clearly with more details.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:25 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
 Re: Wisconsin
The early words have Obama running even with Hillary among women. That'd point to a big win for him if that holds.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:48 pm |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Wisconsin
And the number one issue was the economy rather than health care. The war was ahead of health care at #2. Those are his two strongest points in the midwest because he has been going after her and Bill for NAFTA and that is basically like a dirty word in the midwest because they've lost so many jobs thanks to it. And the thing is, Hillary wasn't actually for it. But it's baggage from their time in the White House. They benefit from the nostalgia votes so I suppose this issue kind of cancels it out. Oh and I think one of the exit polls was the $50,000 question. It was 59-41 in favor of "greater than $50,000," which of course we know favors him.
I think it will still be close, like 5 points or less. They've both done well there.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:51 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|