Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun May 11, 2025 5:04 pm



Reply to topic  [ 606 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25  Next
 Prop 8 discussion thread: Upheld 
Author Message
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Jim Halpert wrote:
read all my posts and yes you will see I do know the adoption process


So in your opinion, the state foster system and/or orphanages are better at raising children than single people or co-cohabiting couples. Is that right?

Admittedly, I don't know a lot about what happens to unadopted children. It must be pretty awesome.


Sun Nov 16, 2008 10:57 pm
Profile WWW
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Beeblebrox wrote:
Jim Halpert wrote:
read all my posts and yes you will see I do know the adoption process


So in your opinion, the state foster system and/or orphanages are better at raising children than single people or co-cohabiting couples. Is that right?

Admittedly, I don't know a lot about what happens to unadopted children. It must be pretty awesome.


Beeble when trying to argue with someone lose the fucking sarcasm you piece of shit fucking prick. Like I said in the other thread before it was deleted.

Go Fuck Yourself.

You really are as bad as Joe when it comes to these boards.


Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:03 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Jim Halpert wrote:
Beeble when trying to argue with someone lose the fucking sarcasm you piece of shit fucking prick. Like I said in the other thread before it was deleted.

Go Fuck Yourself.

You really are as bad as Joe when it comes to these boards.


Man, you pray to Jesus with that mouth? ;)

It's a simple and legitimate question, Jim. You are stating that you think the alternative is better than a kid being adopted by a single person or unmarried couple. I'm just wondering what that superior alternative is and why it's better.

Surely you thought about that before you cast your vote, right? I guess I don't blame you for not wanting to answer.


Sun Nov 16, 2008 11:13 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8642
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
I believe in the choice of allowing it to happen (gays adopt), but I disagree with it, because I am traditional guy. For crying out loud, I do not listen to any music before 8am as I think its spiritual time and that you should chill out on Sunday's

However, who I am to say who can adopt or not.


However personally I believe a child needs a father and mother figure to be raised well. Not saying it cannot be done with two males or females, but I think overall it would be better. The thing is Gay people are generally decently well off, so they can raise their children well. However, I think every child needs both figures, ideally.

Single parents are the worst. We have seen how many problems black or immigrant youths have been causing being raised by single mothers especially recently in Canada, to those Canadian members. I do not think there is no need to be politically correct because look at what is happening and I think there is no reason to shy away from it.

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:23 am
Profile WWW
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Mannyisthebest wrote:
We have seen how many problems black or immigrant youths have been causing being raised by single mothers especially recently in Canada, to those Canadian members. I do not think there is no need to be politically correct because look at what is happening and I think there is no reason to shy away from it.


This would be a legit point IF there weren't an adoption vetting process. They're not just giving children to any ol' single parents. I have friends who are straight, married and very well off, and they are still being put through the ringer by the adoption system. Let's just say that if anyone had to do this just to have kids, there would be no Britney Spears Jrs in the world.

Any single person who could make it through this process would be more than able to raise a child, certainly as well as the state or the foster system. It's about a support system, finances, and a stable, safe environment. You don't have to have two parents to provide that situation.


Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:32 am
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8642
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
yes, true and usually the space of filling a father role can easily be overcome by a uncle or a neighbour or an older brother.

The mother is much more difficult.

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Mon Nov 17, 2008 12:41 am
Profile WWW
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Jim Halpert wrote:
Beeblebrox wrote:
Jim Halpert wrote:
read all my posts and yes you will see I do know the adoption process


So in your opinion, the state foster system and/or orphanages are better at raising children than single people or co-cohabiting couples. Is that right?

Admittedly, I don't know a lot about what happens to unadopted children. It must be pretty awesome.


Beeble when trying to argue with someone lose the fucking sarcasm you piece of shit fucking prick. Like I said in the other thread before it was deleted.

Go Fuck Yourself.

You really are as bad as Joe when it comes to these boards.

Beeble believes that anyone who differs from him is automatically a "douchenozzle, bat-shit crazy, wingnut, fundamentalist (the last one only on some occasions)."

He doesn't seem to believe a person to be rational who disagrees with him.


Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:35 am
Profile WWW
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Caius wrote:
Beeble believes that anyone who differs from him is automatically a "douchenozzle, bat-shit crazy, wingnut, fundamentalist (the last one only on some occasions)."

He doesn't seem to believe a person to be rational who disagrees with him.


If you want to prevent gays from adopting kids or getting married, you're a douchenozzle, just the same as if you think black people shouldn't get married to each other. That's not about disagreeing with me (although the overlap is evident). That's about bigots being douchenozzles.

If you don't think so, please feel free to make your case. But I'm not about to apologize for calling bigots out for what they are.


Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:43 am
Profile WWW
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Beeblebrox wrote:
Caius wrote:
Beeble believes that anyone who differs from him is automatically a "douchenozzle, bat-shit crazy, wingnut, fundamentalist (the last one only on some occasions)."

He doesn't seem to believe a person to be rational who disagrees with him.


If you want to prevent gays from adopting kids or getting married, you're a douchenozzle, just the same as if you think black people shouldn't get married to each other. That's not about disagreeing with me (although the overlap is evident). That's about bigots being douchenozzles.

If you don't think so, please feel free to make your case. But I'm not about to apologize for calling bigots out for what they are.

Jim simply said he doesn't think single people should adopt. I don't think he mentioned whether or not gay's should adopt.

As for me, I support gay adoption 100% and think any true "family values" conservative should do so as well.


Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:46 am
Profile WWW
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Caius wrote:
As for me, I support gay adoption 100% and think any true "family values" conservative should do so as well.


Yes, but you said that I think any RATIONAL people who disagree with me are douchenozzles. So in this thread, who are the rational people that I think are douchenozzles? I know I've said that about the anti-gay bigots. So if the anti-gay bigots are the rational people you're referring to, then what is their rational case against gay marriage?

And I didn't call Jim anything. I asked him for a reason why he thinks unadopted children are better off not being adopted at all than being adopted by single-parents since he voted for a law that prevents single-parents from adopting. I'm requesting a rational argument for that law and he told me to go fuck myself. And I'm the unreasonable one?


Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:58 am
Profile WWW
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Beeblebrox wrote:
Caius wrote:
Beeble believes that anyone who differs from him is automatically a "douchenozzle, bat-shit crazy, wingnut, fundamentalist (the last one only on some occasions)."

He doesn't seem to believe a person to be rational who disagrees with him.


If you want to prevent gays from adopting kids or getting married, you're a douchenozzle, just the same as if you think black people shouldn't get married to each other. That's not about disagreeing with me (although the overlap is evident). That's about bigots being douchenozzles.

If you don't think so, please feel free to make your case. But I'm not about to apologize for calling bigots out for what they are.


Beeble where the fuck did I say that gays shouldn't have the right to adopt kids. I never fucking said that. Learn to fucking read you arrogant prick.


Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:11 am
Profile
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Beeblebrox wrote:
Caius wrote:
As for me, I support gay adoption 100% and think any true "family values" conservative should do so as well.


Yes, but you said that I think any RATIONAL people who disagree with me are douchenozzles. So in this thread, who are the rational people that I think are douchenozzles? I know I've said that about the anti-gay bigots. So if the anti-gay bigots are the rational people you're referring to, then what is their rational case against gay marriage?

And I didn't call Jim anything. I asked him for a reason why he thinks unadopted children are better off not being adopted at all than being adopted by single-parents since he voted for a law that prevents single-parents from adopting. I'm requesting a rational argument for that law and he told me to go fuck myself. And I'm the unreasonable one?


You're the unreasonable one because i've said my arguments and instead of going oh ok, you decide to use sarcasm and try and be condescending. That's being an arrogant prick.


Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:13 am
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Nite Owl wrote:
Beeble where the fuck did I say that gays shouldn't have the right to adopt kids. I never fucking said that. Learn to fucking read you arrogant prick.


I didn't say you did. You have in fact repeatedly denied that this has anything to do with gays.

I'm simply asking why you think unadopted children are better off not being adopted at all than being adopted by single parents. You're not an arrogant prick, of course, you simply know better than me what's best for these kids. I'm waiting to hear about the awesomeness of them not being adopted.


Mon Nov 17, 2008 3:17 pm
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22182
Location: Places
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
I believe it was proved by psychologists that being raised by same sex parents made some children develop differently??

as for gay marriage, who cares??? let them fithey want to, i dont see the big deal.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Mon Nov 17, 2008 7:50 pm
Profile
A very honest-hearted fellow
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm
Posts: 4767
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Obama won!!! wrote:
I believe it was proved by psychologists that being raised by same sex parents made some children develop differently??

as for gay marriage, who cares??? let them fithey want to, i dont see the big deal.

Without looking, I will assume it has been psychologically proved that growing up with 0 parents leads to more drug, alcohol, crime, and other things social ills like depression and hopelessness.


Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:09 pm
Profile WWW
Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
The numbers of psychological and social issues in children with only one parent are staggering enough to warrant consideration. As far as I know, there simply isn't enough data one way or the other regarding children and same sex parents.

_________________
Image


Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:16 pm
Profile WWW
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Eagle wrote:
The numbers of psychological and social issues in children with only one parent are staggering enough to warrant consideration.


These studies refer almost entirely to single natural birth parents, for which there are absolutely no qualifying standards other than properly functioning reproductive body parts. And the circumstances by which these parents are single are probably going to range from bad to awful.

But for adoptions, we are talking about an insanely strict vetting process. I have friends who are trying to adopt (married, straight) and to call the process rigorous would be an understatement. Any person who could make it through this process, single or married, should be given the opportunity to adopt a child. We're talking about single, successful professionals in stable loving homes who've chosen to remain single for whatever reason. We're talking about the Charlie Crists and Condie Rices of the world, not some trailer trash crack whores.

Would an adoptive child be better off living with Condie Rice or being left in the system unadopted? I say the former, but I'm waiting to hear an argument for the latter.


Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:31 pm
Profile WWW
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Rorschach wrote:
its better that a child have SOMEONE rather than no one.


I honestly don't know what happens to children in the system who are not adopted. Are they better off without parents at all or are they better off with a stable and otherwise qualified but single parent? Jim seems to think the former. But is there any information on what happens to these kids? Are there really orphanages any more like in The Cider House Rules?


Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:51 pm
Profile WWW
Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
My personal belief is that any single parent should be able to attempt adoption, I see absolutely no reason to exclude single parents from the ability to adopt. I will say however that in a case where all things are equal, I would favor a two parent home over a single parent one. Beeble is also 100% correct regarding the fact that low income single parents greatly skew much of the research on single parents.

I have more worries on homosexual couples adopting, as while there isn't enough data to state anything conclusively, the studies we do have are not at all favorable. There are many issues surrounding homosexual adoption, and society sure doesn't make it any easier. The end result of any adoption is the minimization of child removals and stability in a household, and the Child Welfare Act dictates as much. Not sure where I'm going with this ..

_________________
Image


Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:00 pm
Profile WWW
Site Owner
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm
Posts: 14631
Location: Pittsburgh
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Some research:

Quote:
The Widespread Disapproval of Homosexual Behavior Exposes Child to Harmful Stress.

Homosexual behavior is widely disapproved by the majority of the U.S. population. Aware of the social stigma of living with homosexually-behaving adults, school-aged children in households with a homosexual adult generally suffer stress associated with their shame, embarrassment, fears that others will discover their family member’s homosexuality, fears of peer rejection, actual disruption of valued friendships, suffering name-calling or ostracism, and/or seeing their family member disapproved.

Professor Richard E. Redding, J.D., Ph.D., Associate Director of the Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy at the University of Virginia School of Law reviewed evidence that shows that “solid social support networks” have been found to contribute to lower rates of foster placement disruption and with the foster child’s improvement in symptoms of developmental disruption. But homosexual parents (and especially homosexual fathers) generally do not receive the same positive level of extended family and community support for their family life as do married men and women and heterosexual single parents. Instead, homosexual men and women typically experience significant stress when extended family members or others in the community remind them of [1] society’s normative view of heterosexual family life, [2] the unnatural status of homosexuality, and [3] the widespread moral disapproval of homosexual behavior, and when [4] other parents decide to not allow their own children to associate with homosexuals or homosexual’s family members, over concern that their child not be influenced by homosexuals to possibly participate in that deviant lifestyle. And occasionally homosexual adults experience even extreme dysfunctional and/or criminal forms of disapproval that causes them to experience psychological trauma, such as discrimination, verbal abuse, physical abuse, or sexual abuse.

In the parenting process or from conversations with peers, nearly all school-aged children become aware of the wide-spread moral disapproval of homosexual behavior by the majority of the U.S. population. Even though morally disapproving of homosexual conduct, most adults will express kindness, acceptance, and even tolerance of men who say they have sex with men, or of women who say they have sex with women. And most parents, teachers, and moral leaders in the community make an ongoing effort to socialize children to be equally kind to those who may participate in behavior considered immoral. However, many of the peers that foster children encounter in their neighborhood and at school are not yet fully socialized to an ideal adult level of social, emotional, and moral maturity, so not surprisingly, these youngsters often use immature ways to express their awareness of the social stigma and wide-spread moral disapproval attached to homosexual behavior.

Therefore, if other children learn that a particular child lives in a household with a homosexually-behaving adult, or with “two mothers,” or “two fathers,” that child is at very high risk of suffering shame, embarrassment, fear that others will discover they live with a homosexual, as well as the keen emotional stress of being cruelly teased, called derogatory names, rejected, or in some extreme cases even beaten up if peers do find out about their family structure. School-aged children in the United States are generally aware that words associated with homosexual behavior such as “gay,” “fag,” “queer,” or “lesbo,” carry strong negative connotations among their peers, in the same way (if not worse) than other hostile put-downs children regrettably use such as “retard,” “nerd,” or “fatso."


And it continues for about 80 pages before eventually concluding that it is unfair and irresponsible (for adoption agencies) to expose a child to that stress deliberately.

_________________
Image


Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:13 pm
Profile WWW
i break the rules, so i don't care
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 20411
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
this thread is making me happy that this is just a movie forum.

lets be realistic for god's sake.

people who believe adoption should be left for married couples must live in a perfect world where everything is tradition. While I suppose it's sad that people who really want a child are being denied one just because they don't want to get married. I mean needless to say that a couple could adopt a child when married, only to divorce a month later. and there is a big difference between adoption, giving a child a home for the rest of their life and the foster care system. Proper adoption agencies have strict criteria, it's costly, time consuming, married couples are always given 1st preference, so it's always a tough ask for a person who isn't married to get a child anyway, but i don't know let's remove the right just in case. let children spend more time in foster care, to which some of these families use it as a 2nd income to support themselves. oh and please don't behind psychological facts about 1-parents. 1 is still better than none. and with so many "divorces" this is hardly the time to be worried about that.

oh and that piece of legislation was targeted towards gay people, it's implied cuz gay people can't get married.

and why on earth are people bringing the nature vs nuture argument into a discussion about gay marriage. it has nothing to do with it, its about 1 persons right to have the same choice others do when it comes to making a decision about a loved one.

and Magnus while you may think its ok to have an opinion that gay people shouldn't be treated equally, let it be known that certain members of the public wish to have rights taken away from Muslims as well. hell, i bet 99.99999% of people would tick terrorist next next to ur name, as opposed to me, you know the pure white one.

oh and just downright homophobia from the general public was the contributing factor, yes religious members made up a lot, but proposition 4 on the CA ballot about taking the rights away from teenagers in regards to abortion FAILED. where were the religious people then campaigning against that?


Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:18 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 9:18 pm
Posts: 12159
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
o hai getluv


Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:19 pm
Profile
i break the rules, so i don't care
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm
Posts: 20411
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Eagle wrote:
Some research:

Quote:
The Widespread Disapproval of Homosexual Behavior Exposes Child to Harmful Stress.

Homosexual behavior is widely disapproved by the majority of the U.S. population. Aware of the social stigma of living with homosexually-behaving adults, school-aged children in households with a homosexual adult generally suffer stress associated with their shame, embarrassment, fears that others will discover their family member’s homosexuality, fears of peer rejection, actual disruption of valued friendships, suffering name-calling or ostracism, and/or seeing their family member disapproved.

Professor Richard E. Redding, J.D., Ph.D., Associate Director of the Institute of Law, Psychiatry and Public Policy at the University of Virginia School of Law reviewed evidence that shows that “solid social support networks” have been found to contribute to lower rates of foster placement disruption and with the foster child’s improvement in symptoms of developmental disruption. But homosexual parents (and especially homosexual fathers) generally do not receive the same positive level of extended family and community support for their family life as do married men and women and heterosexual single parents. Instead, homosexual men and women typically experience significant stress when extended family members or others in the community remind them of [1] society’s normative view of heterosexual family life, [2] the unnatural status of homosexuality, and [3] the widespread moral disapproval of homosexual behavior, and when [4] other parents decide to not allow their own children to associate with homosexuals or homosexual’s family members, over concern that their child not be influenced by homosexuals to possibly participate in that deviant lifestyle. And occasionally homosexual adults experience even extreme dysfunctional and/or criminal forms of disapproval that causes them to experience psychological trauma, such as discrimination, verbal abuse, physical abuse, or sexual abuse.

In the parenting process or from conversations with peers, nearly all school-aged children become aware of the wide-spread moral disapproval of homosexual behavior by the majority of the U.S. population. Even though morally disapproving of homosexual conduct, most adults will express kindness, acceptance, and even tolerance of men who say they have sex with men, or of women who say they have sex with women. And most parents, teachers, and moral leaders in the community make an ongoing effort to socialize children to be equally kind to those who may participate in behavior considered immoral. However, many of the peers that foster children encounter in their neighborhood and at school are not yet fully socialized to an ideal adult level of social, emotional, and moral maturity, so not surprisingly, these youngsters often use immature ways to express their awareness of the social stigma and wide-spread moral disapproval attached to homosexual behavior.

Therefore, if other children learn that a particular child lives in a household with a homosexually-behaving adult, or with “two mothers,” or “two fathers,” that child is at very high risk of suffering shame, embarrassment, fear that others will discover they live with a homosexual, as well as the keen emotional stress of being cruelly teased, called derogatory names, rejected, or in some extreme cases even beaten up if peers do find out about their family structure. School-aged children in the United States are generally aware that words associated with homosexual behavior such as “gay,” “fag,” “queer,” or “lesbo,” carry strong negative connotations among their peers, in the same way (if not worse) than other hostile put-downs children regrettably use such as “retard,” “nerd,” or “fatso."


And it continues for about 80 pages before eventually concluding that it is unfair and irresponsible to expose a child to that stress deliberately.


please don't handpick the people that agree with you. read the first sentence of paragraph 3 again.

i'm kinda over people having opinions, really. i'm not saying that it's your opinion, but seriously.


Last edited by getluv on Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:23 pm
Profile
Town Bike
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:34 pm
Posts: 1264
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
In what peer reviewed journal did this paper appear?

_________________

Image



Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:23 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm
Posts: 4679
Post Re: Prop 8 discussion thread: Yes 52%
Eagle wrote:
The Widespread Disapproval of Homosexual Behavior Exposes Child to Harmful Stress.


Oh god.

This kind of bigotry was EXACTLY the justification used to oppose interracial marriages. "Think of how mixed race children will be stigmatized!" The solution is notto prevent interracial couples from adopting or having children, but to educate the public to make such families more accepted. That's why the legalization of gay marriage is such an important step.


Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:26 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 606 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.