Go right ahead.

The northwest hates Clinton.

527 people were polled. I don't care who you favor, a poll with that small of a sample can't be indicative of a whole state.

Considering South Dakota's population is about the same size as metro Albuquerque, I don't understand your point.

527 people in South Dakota is proportionally equal to about 20,000 people in California.

Look, I've made a living with data analysis in the past. There is no point putting down a poll just because you don't like it. It's not a particularly informative poll, but the issue is the percentage undecided, not the sample size.

That said, there is no indication South Dakota would break for Clinton. Caucus results being illegitimate is an excuse Clinton made up. If you look at how much better Obama polls against McCain than Clinton does in the prairie/mountain states, it would be obvious there is something deeper going on. There is nothing wrong with a giant swath of America disliking your pet candidate. My crew has to deal with the same problem in Appalachia.

Now take a deep breath.

Actual, if the sample was taken properly it can.

Yep.

Basic Statistics should be required, and you can't pass till you "get" it.

Heh. Depending on your major my school requires it. Psych majors have to take one version, same for sociology majors. Bio and other science majors have to take the regular math version...

Well looks like I was right about South Dakota.