Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Author |
Message |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
It wouldn't be a stepping stone to 2012 if she wins. It would also force him to become a daily defender and spokesperson for someone he probably can't stand.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:14 am |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Told ya. 
_________________
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 11:42 am |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
not surprising.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:24 pm |
|
 |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Clinton and her camp need to pounce on this now. Just like they did yesterday (or the day before) when one of Obama's closest Foriegn Policy Advisers called Clinton a Monster, who later apoligized and resigned. This adviser also said that Obama's Iraq Plan was only a best-case senario, not a firm commitment like he has been saying to everyone. The War in Iraq is probably the issue he is best on, since he doesn't even have a stand. I don't count someone saying they would have voted NO if they didn't actually vote. Anyone can say that. So they now need to attack Obama on this remark about not accepting the VP spot if it comes along, as not actually being a man of his word, a uniter of the party, not a divider. Clinton did the right thing and said it's possibility the day after her wins in OH and TX, but now Obama says no deal. It's all about getting Obama off his message, and luring him into attacks, a smear campaign which he has said he wouldn't run.
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 12:35 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
10 out of 23 counties in Wyoming have reported, and Obama is leading 66%-33%, thanks to Albany's huge winning margin: http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/primar ... MMAPcaucus
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:02 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Apostle Ericka wrote: Clinton and her camp need to pounce on this now. Just like they did yesterday (or the day before) when one of Obama's closest Foriegn Policy Advisers called Clinton a Monster, who later apoligized and resigned. This adviser also said that Obama's Iraq Plan was only a best-case senario, not a firm commitment like he has been saying to everyone. The War in Iraq is probably the issue he is best on, since he doesn't even have a stand. I don't count someone saying they would have voted NO if they didn't actually vote. Anyone can say that. So they now need to attack Obama on this remark about not accepting the VP spot if it comes along, as not actually being a man of his word, a uniter of the party, not a divider. Clinton did the right thing and said it's possibility the day after her wins in OH and TX, but now Obama says no deal. It's all about getting Obama off his message, and luring him into attacks, a smear campaign which he has said he wouldn't run. He could easily respond that he didn't claim to be a uniter of the party but of the nation and he can't achieve that if he's the number 2 man to the most divisive Democratic politician of the last 30 years. He hasn't run a smear campaign and there's nothing negative about saying he won't be vp - he has no reason to accept vp when he's ahead in states and delegates and probably the popular vote as well. But I agree with you that Hillary's plan was to get him off message. It won't help her win, but it will help her cripple Obama so that McCain won't have a hard time beating him, which seems to be her real goal. She's basically a Huckabee staying in the race for her own purposes. But you have to hand it to Huckabee, at least he behaved with class and dignity.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:14 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Ummm guys....you said you wont see his a s vp while hes the leader. if hillary takes the lead in votes or delegates its a different story. Corpse he has run a few smear ads and they worked pretty damn well, they ran before feb 5th. the "she does anything to in" stuff
Clinton supporters havent noticed but tend to listen to barack over hillary, you dont want him persoinally pubically mauling her because more people will believe it.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:16 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
I think him saying that actually helps him.
Because all the people who wanted BOTH in office and are voting for Hillary are questioning themselves because they want Obama in more than Hillary.
And voting for him would be the only way.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:17 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Munk·E wrote: I think him saying that actually helps him.
Because all the people who wanted BOTH in office and are voting for Hillary are questioning themselves because they want Obama in more than Hillary.
And voting for him would be the only way. EXACTLY. In recent days Hillary gotten press for saying she might have him as her VP. Its obviously a ploy to the undecided that if they vote for her, they might be voting for them both. Now its not the case.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:19 pm |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Apostle Ericka wrote: Clinton and her camp need to pounce on this now. Just like they did yesterday (or the day before) when one of Obama's closest Foriegn Policy Advisers called Clinton a Monster, who later apoligized and resigned. This adviser also said that Obama's Iraq Plan was only a best-case senario, not a firm commitment like he has been saying to everyone. The War in Iraq is probably the issue he is best on, since he doesn't even have a stand. I don't count someone saying they would have voted NO if they didn't actually vote. Anyone can say that. So they now need to attack Obama on this remark about not accepting the VP spot if it comes along, as not actually being a man of his word, a uniter of the party, not a divider. Clinton did the right thing and said it's possibility the day after her wins in OH and TX, but now Obama says no deal. It's all about getting Obama off his message, and luring him into attacks, a smear campaign which he has said he wouldn't run. He be dumb to take it. I think if Hillary is the nominee McCain would kill her anyway and Obama can just run against Edwards and who ever else in 2012 (Hillary wouldn't get a second chance much like Kerry and Gore haven't).
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:24 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Munk·E wrote: I think him saying that actually helps him.
Because all the people who wanted BOTH in office and are voting for Hillary are questioning themselves because they want Obama in more than Hillary.
And voting for him would be the only way.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:32 pm |
|
 |
Krem
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:04 pm Posts: 2035 Location: Citizens Bank Park
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
As a Pennsylvania resident, I've never witnessed a competitive presidential race. Am looking forward to 6 more weeks of nastiness! (Did the groundhog have something to do with that?)
_________________ Let's go Phillies.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:34 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
OK, the biggest county Laramie, where Cheyenne is located, finished reporting, so only 5 smaller counties left, and Obama is winning Wyoming for sure, probably gaining 2 delegates (7-5; doesn't look like the margin will be big enough for 8-4).
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:16 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Im gonna say it now, The end of Hillarys road may be in North Carolina. After Mississippi, Obama shoud have roughly 165 pledged delegate lead on clinton and about 130 total delegate lead on her. (^using rcp's totals) If she does not win Pennsylvania, shes done, obviously. But realistically she will win but it will probably by a 8-12% win at most. Again 75% of the states population are cities and urban areas, places that heavily favors Obama. The thing is, if thats the case she'll get roughly 84-85 delegates to his 68-70. That pledged delegate lead will drop to about 150ish. Than NC has 100 delegates and polls have Obama winning by about 100%. Assuming polls hold which they should, I cant recall a place where Hillarey trailed early (nor as large as 10%) and ended up winning in this whole process. After NC, the leada back up 156 and with no real major states left...itd be all over. http://www.city-journal.org/2008/eon0306gs.htmleurope also appearently loves Obama.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:41 pm |
|
 |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Archie Gates wrote: Apostle Ericka wrote: Clinton and her camp need to pounce on this now. Just like they did yesterday (or the day before) when one of Obama's closest Foriegn Policy Advisers called Clinton a Monster, who later apoligized and resigned. This adviser also said that Obama's Iraq Plan was only a best-case senario, not a firm commitment like he has been saying to everyone. The War in Iraq is probably the issue he is best on, since he doesn't even have a stand. I don't count someone saying they would have voted NO if they didn't actually vote. Anyone can say that. So they now need to attack Obama on this remark about not accepting the VP spot if it comes along, as not actually being a man of his word, a uniter of the party, not a divider. Clinton did the right thing and said it's possibility the day after her wins in OH and TX, but now Obama says no deal. It's all about getting Obama off his message, and luring him into attacks, a smear campaign which he has said he wouldn't run. He could easily respond that he didn't claim to be a uniter of the party but of the nation and he can't achieve that if he's the number 2 man to the most divisive Democratic politician of the last 30 years. He hasn't run a smear campaign and there's nothing negative about saying he won't be vp - he has no reason to accept vp when he's ahead in states and delegates and probably the popular vote as well. But I agree with you that Hillary's plan was to get him off message. It won't help her win, but it will help her cripple Obama so that McCain won't have a hard time beating him, which seems to be her real goal. She's basically a Huckabee staying in the race for her own purposes. But you have to hand it to Huckabee, at least he behaved with class and dignity. You can't unite the country, when you have a significant number of your own party not supporting you. And definitely not when your own adivsers call your opponent of the same party a monster. If she's the most divisive, why is she still in this? And in this as in having a shot at winning the nomination? Saying she is a Huckabee is just plain ignorance and hate on your part, or blind love for Obama, one or the other, maybe both. I wouldn't support Hillary if I knew she had no chance at winning. I will support whoever gets the nomination. But Obama has yet to show he can win elections. He wins all these little caucus states. That isn't anything THAT impressive. A causus is NOT an election. A primary is a much better example of how an election works. A Caucus excludes way too many people, and often can lead to fear tactics and threats and the sort. A working mother in the day, who has to pick her daughter up in the evening from school isn't going to have time to go caucus somewhere. You just don't go and vote in a Caucus. They can take hours. Working people are at big disadvantages in them. The only win on Obama's side that impresses me is Missouri and to a point Wisconsin. A caucus greatly favors him because of his supporters. And anyone that says a primary favors Clinton, and her only, are ignorant. A primary in no way excludes his supporters the same way a caucus does to Clinton's supporters. Almost anyone can find a little time in the day to get out to a polling station and just vote. The same cannot be said about a caucus. Well, this NOV isnt going to be one giant caucus. It's going to be an election. A voting process he has yet to impress me with since he's lost nearly all the key states.
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:46 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Krem wrote: As a Pennsylvania resident, I've never witnessed a competitive presidential race. Am looking forward to 6 more weeks of nastiness! (Did the groundhog have something to do with that?) I agree! Oh, and check this out: http://www.theonion.com/content/opinion ... _day_is_it
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:11 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Do you print in rose because of your rose colored glasses? Apostle Ericka wrote: You can't unite the country, when you have a significant number of your own party not supporting you. You really think that Hillary's supporters are going to vote for McCain? And, I might point out, that a more significant number of his own party are supporting him than her. Apostle Ericka wrote: And definitely not when your own adivsers call your opponent of the same party a monster. And Obama agrees, which is why he fired her. Hillary, on the other hand, surrounds herself with people like that. It's part of her campaign strategy after all -- attack with the "kitchen sink" and see what sticks. I find it hard to believe any Hillary supporter who criticizes Obama on the ethics issue. Oh, and your point about caucuses verses primaries? If you think primaries are better and better represent the will of the people, then can you explain why you are not supporting Obama, since he has the higher number of popular votes as well?
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:15 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Apostle Ericka wrote: You can't unite the country, when you have a significant number of your own party not supporting you. Than explain how Hillaryis supopsed to do it, because thst just about the only way she can.
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:16 pm |
|
 |
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
I love how people continue to dimiss Hillary when three times she's proven she can't be dismissed. How fun it will be when she's the nominee.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:23 pm |
|
 |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Groucho wrote: Do you print in rose because of your rose colored glasses? Apostle Ericka wrote: You can't unite the country, when you have a significant number of your own party not supporting you. You really think that Hillary's supporters are going to vote for McCain? And, I might point out, that a more significant number of his own party are supporting him than her. Apostle Ericka wrote: And definitely not when your own adivsers call your opponent of the same party a monster. And Obama agrees, which is why he fired her. Hillary, on the other hand, surrounds herself with people like that. It's part of her campaign strategy after all -- attack with the "kitchen sink" and see what sticks. I find it hard to believe any Hillary supporter who criticizes Obama on the ethics issue. Oh, and your point about caucuses verses primaries? If you think primaries are better and better represent the will of the people, then can you explain why you are not supporting Obama, since he has the higher number of popular votes as well? Some conservative DEMS could very well vote for McCain, which is why Obama could struggle in OH, PA, and FL against McCain. He's too liberal to guarentee a win in those states. The same cannot be said about the more liberal DEMS changing from Obama to McCain.
His adviser resigned. There was no firing mentioned, though I'm sure there was behind the scenes, but most people will only know that she resigned, and that Obama did not fire her.
I'm not supporting the candidate who receives the most votes. Because having more votes doesn't mean you will win the White House. Winning the votes in the states that matter will win you the White House. And Clinton is favored in nearly all those states, especially the big three (OH, PA, and FL). I'll support Obama if he gets the nomination of course, but I'll always be worried if he ends up losing PA and FL if/when they do their re-votes. I like both candidates, and I don't try to make either of them the villian in this race, unlike most people do. Always posting "Ooppps, another scandal" articles, or saying if one or the other wins, I'd consider voting for McCain.
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:25 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22214 Location: Places
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
No Country for Sam wrote: I love how people continue to dimiss Hillary when three times she's proven she can't be dismissed. How fun it will be when she's the nominee. viewtopic.php?f=48&t=39260 
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 5:39 pm |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Apostle Ericka wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Apostle Ericka wrote: Clinton and her camp need to pounce on this now. Just like they did yesterday (or the day before) when one of Obama's closest Foriegn Policy Advisers called Clinton a Monster, who later apoligized and resigned. This adviser also said that Obama's Iraq Plan was only a best-case senario, not a firm commitment like he has been saying to everyone. The War in Iraq is probably the issue he is best on, since he doesn't even have a stand. I don't count someone saying they would have voted NO if they didn't actually vote. Anyone can say that. So they now need to attack Obama on this remark about not accepting the VP spot if it comes along, as not actually being a man of his word, a uniter of the party, not a divider. Clinton did the right thing and said it's possibility the day after her wins in OH and TX, but now Obama says no deal. It's all about getting Obama off his message, and luring him into attacks, a smear campaign which he has said he wouldn't run. He could easily respond that he didn't claim to be a uniter of the party but of the nation and he can't achieve that if he's the number 2 man to the most divisive Democratic politician of the last 30 years. He hasn't run a smear campaign and there's nothing negative about saying he won't be vp - he has no reason to accept vp when he's ahead in states and delegates and probably the popular vote as well. But I agree with you that Hillary's plan was to get him off message. It won't help her win, but it will help her cripple Obama so that McCain won't have a hard time beating him, which seems to be her real goal. She's basically a Huckabee staying in the race for her own purposes. But you have to hand it to Huckabee, at least he behaved with class and dignity. You can't unite the country, when you have a significant number of your own party not supporting you. And definitely not when your own adivsers call your opponent of the same party a monster. If she's the most divisive, why is she still in this? And in this as in having a shot at winning the nomination? Saying she is a Huckabee is just plain ignorance and hate on your part, or blind love for Obama, one or the other, maybe both. I wouldn't support Hillary if I knew she had no chance at winning. I will support whoever gets the nomination. But Obama has yet to show he can win elections. He wins all these little caucus states. That isn't anything THAT impressive. A causus is NOT an election. A primary is a much better example of how an election works. A Caucus excludes way too many people, and often can lead to fear tactics and threats and the sort. A working mother in the day, who has to pick her daughter up in the evening from school isn't going to have time to go caucus somewhere. You just don't go and vote in a Caucus. They can take hours. Working people are at big disadvantages in them. The only win on Obama's side that impresses me is Missouri and to a point Wisconsin. A caucus greatly favors him because of his supporters. And anyone that says a primary favors Clinton, and her only, are ignorant. A primary in no way excludes his supporters the same way a caucus does to Clinton's supporters. Almost anyone can find a little time in the day to get out to a polling station and just vote. The same cannot be said about a caucus. Well, this NOV isnt going to be one giant caucus. It's going to be an election. A voting process he has yet to impress me with since he's lost nearly all the key states.Bullshit, Hillary won't unite the party, she has first off pissed off people like me who are democrats and who now can't stand her. I think 60% of Obama supports either will vote for an independent or sit home. I know I would never vote for her now even if it means 4 for more years of a Republican. She is just a republican in democrat clothes.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:25 pm |
|
 |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Jedi Master Carr wrote: Apostle Ericka wrote: Archie Gates wrote: Apostle Ericka wrote: Clinton and her camp need to pounce on this now. Just like they did yesterday (or the day before) when one of Obama's closest Foriegn Policy Advisers called Clinton a Monster, who later apoligized and resigned. This adviser also said that Obama's Iraq Plan was only a best-case senario, not a firm commitment like he has been saying to everyone. The War in Iraq is probably the issue he is best on, since he doesn't even have a stand. I don't count someone saying they would have voted NO if they didn't actually vote. Anyone can say that. So they now need to attack Obama on this remark about not accepting the VP spot if it comes along, as not actually being a man of his word, a uniter of the party, not a divider. Clinton did the right thing and said it's possibility the day after her wins in OH and TX, but now Obama says no deal. It's all about getting Obama off his message, and luring him into attacks, a smear campaign which he has said he wouldn't run. He could easily respond that he didn't claim to be a uniter of the party but of the nation and he can't achieve that if he's the number 2 man to the most divisive Democratic politician of the last 30 years. He hasn't run a smear campaign and there's nothing negative about saying he won't be vp - he has no reason to accept vp when he's ahead in states and delegates and probably the popular vote as well. But I agree with you that Hillary's plan was to get him off message. It won't help her win, but it will help her cripple Obama so that McCain won't have a hard time beating him, which seems to be her real goal. She's basically a Huckabee staying in the race for her own purposes. But you have to hand it to Huckabee, at least he behaved with class and dignity. You can't unite the country, when you have a significant number of your own party not supporting you. And definitely not when your own adivsers call your opponent of the same party a monster. If she's the most divisive, why is she still in this? And in this as in having a shot at winning the nomination? Saying she is a Huckabee is just plain ignorance and hate on your part, or blind love for Obama, one or the other, maybe both. I wouldn't support Hillary if I knew she had no chance at winning. I will support whoever gets the nomination. But Obama has yet to show he can win elections. He wins all these little caucus states. That isn't anything THAT impressive. A causus is NOT an election. A primary is a much better example of how an election works. A Caucus excludes way too many people, and often can lead to fear tactics and threats and the sort. A working mother in the day, who has to pick her daughter up in the evening from school isn't going to have time to go caucus somewhere. You just don't go and vote in a Caucus. They can take hours. Working people are at big disadvantages in them. The only win on Obama's side that impresses me is Missouri and to a point Wisconsin. A caucus greatly favors him because of his supporters. And anyone that says a primary favors Clinton, and her only, are ignorant. A primary in no way excludes his supporters the same way a caucus does to Clinton's supporters. Almost anyone can find a little time in the day to get out to a polling station and just vote. The same cannot be said about a caucus. Well, this NOV isnt going to be one giant caucus. It's going to be an election. A voting process he has yet to impress me with since he's lost nearly all the key states.Bullshit, Hillary won't unite the party, she has first off pissed off people like me who are democrats and who now can't stand her. I think 60% of Obama supports either will vote for an independent or sit home. I know I would never vote for her now even if it means 4 for more years of a Republican. She is just a republican in democrat clothes. I never said she could unite the party. I have no idea if she could, and I have no idea of Obama could. No one knows for sure.
Care to give some reasons for hating her? I don't hate either of them, but I'll give you reasons I'm backing Hillary:
1. Her plans are far more clear. Even exit polls from TUES agreed here. 2. Her Health Care Plan doesn't exclude anyone. Unlike Obama's. 3. Obama has won very few elections, and several cacuses. His strength in an actual election, hasn't been that great so far. Especially in bigger states. And without states lik OH, PA, and FL, he wouldn't get elected. So far, she has won what's needed. 4. I am now concerned over his Iraq Plan when is own FOREIGN Adviser said his plan wasn't a commitment to withdrawing troops asap, but was just a best-case scenario. So I wait his explanation of this. And NOT a website announcement, a public explanation.
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 7:43 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40601
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
Hillary would be as Democrat-only as Bush was for Republicans, I think we're all sick of that. Both Obama and McCain would be more in the middle and would concentrate on both sides.
Obama would also have a much easier time in the general election than her, to say the least
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:01 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
 Re: Pennsylvania, Here We Come
A girl has a suggestion for an ad for Obama. The political ad that sparked nationwide controversy turns out to have a surprising local connection.
One of the actors in the Hillary Clinton ad was shocked to see herself, especially because she's a fierce supporter of Barack Obama.
The so-called "red-phone ad" was played all over the country and helped turn the tide for Hillary Clinton leading up to her big win in Ohio. The ad shows a sleeping child and asks voters who they would want to see answering a 3 a.m. emergency phone call to the White House.
But the young girl starring in the ad will actually be voting age next month and says she's no fan of Hillary Clinton.
Thursday night, the Knowles family of Bonney Lake, Wash., watched the Jon Stewart Show and saw the ad for the first time.
"I looked and saw a girl that looked like my sister and we rewound it and sure enough it was my sister," said Brady Knowles.
The first girl in the ad is young Casey Knowles. It's stock footage from eight years ago when she worked as a TV extra - footage owned now by Getty Images and used by the Clinton campaign.
But they couldn't have picked a more unwilling star.
"It's really sort of ironic that my image would be used to advocate for Hillary when I myself do not," said Casey.
She may only be 17, but Casey has some very strong political opinions. She turns 18 - legal voting age - in April, in plenty of time before the general election.
"It's perfect timing because I have a candidate that I really identify with," she said.
"I've been campaigning for Barack Obama for a few months now," she said. "I was actually a precinct captain at the caucuses a few months ago. I attended his rally a few months ago and I'm a very, very avid supporter."
The Knowles family admit they have no control over how the footage is used. And while they see the humor of it all, they are mildly annoyed.
"I think it would be really wonderful if me and Barack Obama could get together and make a nice counter ad," she laughed.
|
Sat Mar 08, 2008 8:23 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|