Author |
Message |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: Wisconsin
The early exit polls said that Change was the #1 issue for the Wisconsin Voters. If that is true, Obama should get a victory.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:57 pm |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Jedi Master Carr wrote: The early exit polls said that Change was the #1 issue for the Wisconsin Voters. If that is true, Obama should get a victory. Meh. Hillary switched to that as her message for a while too. 
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:00 pm |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: Wisconsin
redfirebird2008 wrote: Jedi Master Carr wrote: The early exit polls said that Change was the #1 issue for the Wisconsin Voters. If that is true, Obama should get a victory. Meh. Hillary switched to that as her message for a while too.  lol well she has been preaching experience lately.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:08 pm |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Jedi Master Carr wrote: redfirebird2008 wrote: Jedi Master Carr wrote: The early exit polls said that Change was the #1 issue for the Wisconsin Voters. If that is true, Obama should get a victory. Meh. Hillary switched to that as her message for a while too.  lol well she has been preaching experience lately. Yes. She focused her message. At first it was about experience, then it went to change, and now it's back to experience except she sharpened the rhetoric to include "speeches vs. solutions, "talk vs. action," "rhetoric vs. results."
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:10 pm |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: Wisconsin
redfirebird2008 wrote: Jedi Master Carr wrote: redfirebird2008 wrote: Jedi Master Carr wrote: The early exit polls said that Change was the #1 issue for the Wisconsin Voters. If that is true, Obama should get a victory. Meh. Hillary switched to that as her message for a while too.  lol well she has been preaching experience lately. Yes. She focused her message. At first it was about experience, then it went to change, and now it's back to experience except she sharpened the rhetoric to include "speeches vs. solutions, "talk vs. action," "rhetoric vs. results." I think she is full of it. Why is Hillary more experienced than Obama or Edwards. She has only been in the Senate for like 8 years. So she screwed the President for 8 years that don't qualify her to be President. If we were going to vote experience we might as well just give to McCain right now.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:16 pm |
|
 |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
 Re: Wisconsin
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:18 pm |
|
 |
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Hillary knows the players and the game. She's proven herself in the Senate. She's an accomplished lawyer. She was very active as a First Lady. I see her as the VP of a popular President who is now running for the White House. If you have a VP and a Senator running, who is the more experienced for the White House? The VP. So Hillary is more experienced in that regard.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:21 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
 Re: Wisconsin
No Country for Sam wrote: Hillary knows the players and the game. She's proven herself in the Senate. She's an accomplished lawyer. She was very active as a First Lady. I see her as the VP of a popular President who is now running for the White House. If you have a VP and a Senator running, who is the more experienced for the White House? The VP. So Hillary is more experienced in that regard. So you think Cheney would be a better president than either Clinton or Obama, right?
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:26 pm |
|
 |
Jedi Master Carr
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 9:51 pm Posts: 11637
|
 Re: Wisconsin
No Country for Sam wrote: Hillary knows the players and the game. She's proven herself in the Senate. She's an accomplished lawyer. She was very active as a First Lady. I see her as the VP of a popular President who is now running for the White House. If you have a VP and a Senator running, who is the more experienced for the White House? The VP. So Hillary is more experienced in that regard. I just don't think that is experienced like running a country. She knows how to work the senate the president's job is a huge difference. To me unless you are president or Vice President you can't use the experience issue to run for president.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:27 pm |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Groucho wrote: No Country for Sam wrote: Hillary knows the players and the game. She's proven herself in the Senate. She's an accomplished lawyer. She was very active as a First Lady. I see her as the VP of a popular President who is now running for the White House. If you have a VP and a Senator running, who is the more experienced for the White House? The VP. So Hillary is more experienced in that regard. So you think Cheney would be a better president than either Clinton or Obama, right? BWHAHAHAHAHAHA! God help us all. 
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:30 pm |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Jedi Master Carr wrote: No Country for Sam wrote: Hillary knows the players and the game. She's proven herself in the Senate. She's an accomplished lawyer. She was very active as a First Lady. I see her as the VP of a popular President who is now running for the White House. If you have a VP and a Senator running, who is the more experienced for the White House? The VP. So Hillary is more experienced in that regard. I just don't think that is experienced like running a country. She knows how to work the senate the president's job is a huge difference. To me unless you are president or Vice President you can't use the experience issue to run for president. Yeah. Obama has actually been a legislator for longer than her, he too was a very good lawyer (civil rights specialty), he taught Constitutional Law, and his first job out of college was as a community organizer. I think they're both pretty inexperienced as far as being President goes, but they are both running massive campaigns that are basically corporations. He has run his campaign much more effectively than her thus far.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:32 pm |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
 Re: Wisconsin
No Country for Sam wrote: Hillary knows the players and the game. She's proven herself in the Senate. She's an accomplished lawyer. She was very active as a First Lady. I see her as the VP of a popular President who is now running for the White House. If you have a VP and a Senator running, who is the more experienced for the White House? The VP. So Hillary is more experienced in that regard. http://rasmussenreports.com/public_cont ... oofs_againthis really shows how much clinton actually has done in her "political" career.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:39 pm |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Wisconsin
You didn't just cite Dick Morris did you?  That guy loathes the Clintons more than anyone else in America. Not exactly an objective source.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:44 pm |
|
 |
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
 Re: Wisconsin
lol that was such a fair and balanced article.... NOT!
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:45 pm |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Wisconsin
No Country for Sam wrote: lol that was such a fair and balanced article.... NOT! As soon as you see the name "Dick Morris" associated with it, you can pretty much ignore it, or at least that is how I treat him. But I guess I should like him since I'm an Obama supporter, but I still think he's a sleaze ball and full of sh*t a majority of the time.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:46 pm |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
 Re: Wisconsin
No Country for Sam wrote: lol that was such a fair and balanced article.... NOT! he ran down everything in her career. It shows that she is running on her last name, not because she has experience because the simple fact is she doesnt.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 8:46 pm |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
 Re: Wisconsin
I'm optimistic but still a bit worried. I think Clinton's showing might be understated by these polls.
This is different from Super Tuesday, though, where it was less about percentages and more about delegates. Here, Obama could win by 5 votes, and it'd be win for him.
Results should be coming in 45 minutes.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:16 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Wisconsin
I dunno, I never expected Clinton to win in Wisconsin, and was heavily skeptical of recent polls that had her drawing even.
_________________
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:34 pm |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Let's also not forget that Hawaii caucuses are tonight, too. Because of the time thing, though, results won't be in till late.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:40 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Wisconsin
It's all irrelevant. Texas, Ohio and PA are the real states. Clinton needs all 3, and should get them.
_________________
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:41 pm |
|
 |
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Eagle wrote: It's all irrelevant. Texas, Ohio and PA are the real states. Clinton needs all 3, and should get them. I don't know if she will get all three, but you have to admit, if she wins tonight, it will make it easier for her to do so.
_________________Buy my books! http://michaelaventrella.com

|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:51 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Groucho wrote: Eagle wrote: It's all irrelevant. Texas, Ohio and PA are the real states. Clinton needs all 3, and should get them. I don't know if she will get all three, but you have to admit, if she wins tonight, it will make it easier for her to do so. If she wins tonight, I think Obama is done.
_________________
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:53 pm |
|
 |
A. G.
Draughty
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 9:23 am Posts: 13347
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Exit polls show more women voters than men and fewer college graduates than in previous primaries. Both of those bode well for Hillary.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:58 pm |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
 Re: Wisconsin
CNN says their exit polls show Obama leading but that they're not ready to project.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:01 pm |
|
 |
Dkmuto
Forum General
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 1:00 am Posts: 6502
|
 Re: Wisconsin
Oh and McCain won.
|
Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:01 pm |
|
|