Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
Re: The Second Debate
The debate itself wasn't fascinating or anything, but I thought Obama articulated himself extremely well (as usual). He also didn't make a point of agreeing with McCain on anything like he did in the first debate.
I thought McCain just came across as kind of rude for a lot of it. He gives off this image of a crabby old man, which I don't think is going to help him pick up any steam in the next month.
Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:57 pm
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
Re: The Second Debate
"my friends" ugh. whoever told him that sounds warm and inviting was an idiot.
Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:27 pm
Argos
Z
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:20 pm Posts: 7952 Location: Wherever he went, including here, it was against his better judgment.
Re: The Second Debate
Libs wrote:
He also didn't make a point of agreeing with McCain on anything like he did in the first debate.
Actually, he did. But it was fine like it was in the first debate.
Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:15 pm
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
Re: The Second Debate
Argos wrote:
Libs wrote:
He also didn't make a point of agreeing with McCain on anything like he did in the first debate.
Actually, he did. But it was fine like it was in the first debate.
Yeah, it seemed like a lot was (stupidly) made of that in the first debate. There's nowt wrong with agreeing with someone when they've made a good point. It's not like he was saying "McCain's right, I'm wrong". More often "Senator McCain is right" was followed up with an intelligent "but..."
Wed Oct 08, 2008 4:15 pm
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
Re: The Second Debate
If you've paid attention during the primaries, and during the presidential race so far, it doesn't matter if Obama goes on the attack or plays nice, it doesn't matter what is brought up by him or against him, none of that seems to matter when it comes to Obama. Which is common when a movement manages to break free, which he managed to do after Super Tuesday, so absolutely nothing is going to matter on the Obama side of things. He can basically do or say whatever he wants, and his numbers across the board will remain the same or even increase. He honestly couldn't ask for a better time.
It was obvious to me, it didn't matter who won the DEM nomination, that the DEMS were taking the White House this year. If they somehow failed to do so.. would clearly show the current DEM party is the weakest it has ever been imo. How do you lose with a President during an unpopular war, an approval rating at 30%, and everything else that has happened in the last 8 years? It seems impossible to lose against all of that, and it frankly is.
I'm not even sure some huge scandal would effect the Obama campaign or his supporters now.
The only thing that seemed to hurt the Obama Campaign were attacks, going negative. Obama was headed straight for the nomination until the end of FEB/Early MAR when Clinton began to really go negative and caused the Obama Campaign to stumble for a few months. Because going negative, WORKS. However, going negative cannot work when there's an abnormal situation happening around the election, in this case that's the economic crisis.
So McCain is basically screwed. It doesnt matter what he says, does, nothing.
“Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:01 pm
Beeblebrox
All Star Poster
Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2004 9:40 pm Posts: 4679
Re: The Second Debate
Corpse wrote:
So McCain is basically screwed. It doesnt matter what he says, does, nothing.
Did anyone notice, in fact, that McCain rather bizarrely proposed to buy up ALL mortgages that were now worth more than their houses and reprice them to market value?
Not only is this a total flip flop from his previous position (shocking, I know) but it's completely untenable. It would make the bailout of Wall Street look like chump change.
It reveals a candidate unhinged, who will literally say anything to win - which, btw, is why he didn't do what wingnuts wanted him to do and go after Ayers, because that tactic will not lead to victory and McCain knows it even if the wingnut base doesn't.
Wed Oct 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
Re: The Second Debate
I noticed that. He also conveniently hasn't mentioned how he plans on paying for it. I heard $300b and that it would come out of the bailout funds. Yea right. It would cost much more than that especially since the proposal would apparently apply to people who aren't even close to defaulting.
Without a major revelation about Obama, McCain is done.
Wed Oct 08, 2008 7:30 pm
Floydboy
ha ha, charade you are
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:05 pm Posts: 2210
Re: The Second Debate
McCain's mortgage plan shifts the bill to the taxpayers. It seems those with the most debt would benefit the most. I'm still trying to make sense of it. Wouldn't it help the lenders more than the taxpayers? And how does he think it will help the housing market? And were as the initial $700 billion rescue plan could make money for taxpayers in the long run, would this one be able to do the same ...?
_________________ Floydboy
Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:40 pm
Floydboy
ha ha, charade you are
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:05 pm Posts: 2210
Re: The Second Debate
Just re-read the transcript. Some things that I picked up on:
During the debate McCain used the words "My Friends" 19 times (21 times? Firefox picked up 19 ,,, anyway a lot). Definitely repeated the phrase way too often. Someone at work today mentioned that she doesn't like to be repeatedly call his friend when she doesn't know him and doesn't consider him a friend. I understand that he was trying to make the audience seem as equals to him, but his overusage of the terms just fueled negativity really. If he would have even used "My fellow Americans" a few times I wouldn't have minded as much.
From re-reading the transcript, these are some shots that he took at Obama. These are the ones that seemed to want to belittle Obama, not disagree with his stances or policies.
- “it’s good to be with you at a town hall meeting†(maybe not too much of a shot, but I know he complained that Obama supposedly wasn't willing to meet with him at these types of meetings) - “they're the ones that, with the encouragement of Sen. Obama and his cronies and his friends in Washington, that went out and made all these risky loans, gave them to people that could never afford to pay back.†(Yep, Obama hangs out with terrorists and thugs) - "Sen. Obama was the second highest recipient of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac money in history -- in history." (here's an article showing that depending how you look at it, McCain may have received more. - "including, by the way, $3 million for an overhead projector at a planetarium in Chicago, Illinois."(Palin's earmarks anyone?) "… not the overhead projector that Sen. Obama asked for, but some of them that are really good projects" (Here's the Chicago Tribune's responce) - "nailing down Sen. Obama's various tax proposals is like nailing Jell-O to the wall. There has been five or six of them and if you wait long enough, there will probably be another one." - "Nuclear power. Sen. Obama says that it has to be safe or disposable or something like that." (I say that phrase often enough, but not in a condescending tone) - "(interrupts) I don't believe that -- did we hear the size of the fine?" - "We don't have time for on-the-job training, my friends." (What has Palin been doing?) - "You know who voted for it? You might never know. That one. You know who voted against it? Me. - "Sure. Hey, I'll answer the question. Look..." (He said fluff just as much or more than Obama)
I really didn't take much out of rereading the transcript, but it served to highlight a few points.
_________________ Floydboy
Last edited by Floydboy on Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Wed Oct 08, 2008 9:16 pm
TonyMontana
Undisputed WoKJ DVD King
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 8:55 am Posts: 16278 Location: Counting the 360 ways I love my Xbox
Re: The Second Debate
Not too much to comment on this one... clearly Obama won, but it was a terribly dull debate overall. Almost no new ground covered, and neither worked the format very well.
McCain would do himself a world of good if he made an effort to appear friendlier and less like a cranky old fart who has a lot of hatred for Obama.
Oh, and I'm flat out amazed that the candidates don't prep better. They use the same lines in every debate, it seems like the others would practice some responses. For example, Obama always says the thing about tax cut for 95% of the people, when it's completely wrong - only about 70% even pay taxes, but McCain never touches it. There are examples on both sides, but with knowing 50% of the script, you'd thing they'd have more 'zingers' prepared.
And that "my friends" thing was annoying... 21 times!
_________________
Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:20 pm
Passionate Thug
Top Poster
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:01 am Posts: 5264 Location: Wakanda
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32636 Location: the last free city
Re: The Second Debate
WOW! @ FNC numbers and how bad it beat MSNBC.
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
Wed Oct 08, 2008 10:32 pm
Groucho
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 9:30 pm Posts: 12096 Location: Stroudsburg, PA
Re: The Second Debate
Rev wrote:
WOW! @ FNC numbers and how bad it beat MSNBC.
That's normal. MSNBC has always been in last place. All the conservatives go to Fox, and the liberals and moderates split their viewership among all the other networks. If you add up CNN and MSNBC, for instance, it's more than Fox.
MSNBC, however, has started recently trying to position itself as the liberal counter to Fox, and their ratings have zoomed up. CNN, having been around much longer, generally was where people went, but now that MSNBC has Olberman and Maddow especially, their ratings are going up. They're even beating CNN at times.
In the debate, McCain portrayed Barack Obama as an excessive spender, and he punctuated his attack (twice) with this example:
"[Obama] voted for nearly a billion dollars in pork barrel earmark projects, including, by the way, $3 million for an overhead projector at a planetarium in Chicago, Illinois. My friends, do we need to spend that kind of money?"
here's the truth-
Quote:
The Adler Planetarium has issued a statement, noting that the request, ironically, was not even funded:
"To clarify, the Adler Planetarium requested federal support -- which was not funded -- to replace a 40 year old Zeiss projector in its historic Sky Theater, the first planetarium theater in the Western Hemisphere.... To remain competitive and ensure national security, it is vital that we educate and inspire the next generation of explorers to pursue careers in science, technology, engineering and math."
Trying to steer the 40-year-old Zeiss projector around the modern universe was like trying to race a vintage Mercedes in the Indy 500. It just won't go.
Modern astronomy and visualization technology have progressed exponentially since the current projector was installed. The ability of a planetarium to share the discoveries of modern astrophysicists depends on the technical capabilities of its theatres and projectors. If the Adler is going to continue to be one of the country's leading science educators, it needs a new projector. The current model, a Zeiss Model VI, is a Frankenstein of parts that are no longer manufactured.
Last edited by Passionate Thug on Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:38 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:33 pm
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
Re: The Second Debate
i watched about 20 minutes of this today on hulu.com
Neither answered the questions and jsut went back to talking points. I doubt I'll even watch the third debate.
I know who i'm voting for.
Thu Oct 09, 2008 4:34 pm
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
Re: The Second Debate
Jim Halpert wrote:
i watched about 20 minutes of this today on hulu.com
Neither answered the questions and jsut went back to talking points. I doubt I'll even watch the third debate.
I know who i'm voting for.
You've known who you were going to vote for for probably 6 months now.. Let me guess: It's Obama??
Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:26 am
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
Re: The Second Debate
MR. GREEN wrote:
Jim Halpert wrote:
i watched about 20 minutes of this today on hulu.com
Neither answered the questions and jsut went back to talking points. I doubt I'll even watch the third debate.
I know who i'm voting for.
You've known who you were going to vote for for probably 6 months now.. Let me guess: It's Obama??
6 months ago I was pulling for McCain
Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:02 am
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
Re: The Second Debate
BKB really doesn't follow the posters political viewpoints very well does he? Next he'll say Kidrock is voting for the Socialist Party.
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:28 pm
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
Re: The Second Debate
Gulli wrote:
BKB really doesn't follow the posters political viewpoints very well does he? Next he'll say Kidrock is voting for the Socialist Party.
I follow just fine, but it's been so incredibly obvious that 95% of this site has been pulling for Obama for probably close to a year now and Halpert knows it cause he's one of them.. He only pulled McCain out of his ass to simply prove me wrong, but he's been for Obama all along just like the rest of you.. Your not fooling me with this BS..
Sat Oct 11, 2008 8:05 am
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
Re: The Second Debate
MR. GREEN wrote:
Gulli wrote:
BKB really doesn't follow the posters political viewpoints very well does he? Next he'll say Kidrock is voting for the Socialist Party.
I follow just fine, but it's been so incredibly obvious that 95% of this site has been pulling for Obama for probably close to a year now and Halpert knows it cause he's one of them.. He only pulled McCain out of his ass to simply prove me wrong, but he's been for Obama all along just like the rest of you.. Your not fooling me with this BS..
I'm not voting obama
Sun Oct 12, 2008 2:37 pm
Floydboy
ha ha, charade you are
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:05 pm Posts: 2210
Re: The Second Debate
I just found out that a few friends of mine in grad school actually played a drinking game during the VP Debate. They took a shot each time she made a wink or some kind of gesture or when she said Maverick. Wow, SNL knows what they're talking about (for all you college guys having a drinking game, Maverick).
Thankfully they were wise and were doing swigs of beer instead of shots. They had a feeling that if they were doing shots they'd all end up in the hospital.
_________________ Floydboy
Sun Oct 12, 2008 8:47 pm
STEVE ROGERS
The Greatest Avenger EVER
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am Posts: 18501
Re: The Second Debate
Floydboy wrote:
Anton Chigurh wrote:
How many people passed out?
Thankfully they were wise and were doing swigs of beer instead of shots. They had a feeling that if they were doing shots they'd all end up in the hospital.
Gee?? Did they all play the drinking game when Obama mentioned the word "CHANGE" in everyone of his speeches?? Guess not cause it's Obama, right??
Tue Oct 14, 2008 8:36 am
Floydboy
ha ha, charade you are
Joined: Fri Sep 26, 2008 6:05 pm Posts: 2210
Re: The Second Debate
MR. GREEN wrote:
Floydboy wrote:
Anton Chigurh wrote:
How many people passed out?
Thankfully they were wise and were doing swigs of beer instead of shots. They had a feeling that if they were doing shots they'd all end up in the hospital.
Gee?? Did they all play the drinking game when Obama mentioned the word "CHANGE" in everyone of his speeches?? Guess not cause it's Obama, right??
Hmm... no they didn't because that's actually something that we would want to see. They didn't play a drinking game when McCain said the word "FIX" either because that is something positive. However, if they knew McCain was going to say "My friends" some 20X they would have played to that as well.
And it has really nothing to do with Obama. They basically wanted something funny and different to play a drinking game to. They thought of Palin and her idiosyncracies.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum