International politics (China, Russia, UK, etc.)
Author |
Message |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40363
|
 Re: International politics (China, Russia, UK, etc.)
Trump just seems better at talking to the Middle East countries and trying to create a vision for stable region, whereas the establishment politicians on both sides job is to make sure the military industry complex always has countries that need weapons from them.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Fri May 16, 2025 11:57 am |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15522 Location: Everywhere
|
 Re: International politics (China, Russia, UK, etc.)
Shack wrote: Trump just seems better at talking to the Middle East countries and trying to create a vision for stable region, whereas the establishment politicians on both sides job is to make sure the military industry complex always has countries that need weapons from them. Your opinion here is dangerously stupid. All Trump can essentially do is try to bribe, but it’s ultimately temporary. He’s only using a different form of bribery. He hasn’t cut military spending: the opposite.
|
Fri May 16, 2025 4:48 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40363
|
 Re: International politics (China, Russia, UK, etc.)
South Africa is an example of "race communism". They want to take white farmers land claiming it will make things more equitable in the same way Stalin wanted to take it from the kulaks. Just race is used instead of class. It would also end the same way where after taking the farmers land, the country would starve to death like a communist country who took away the land or killed the class enemies who know how to use it.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Thu May 22, 2025 5:34 pm |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15522 Location: Everywhere
|
 Re: International politics (China, Russia, UK, etc.)
Again stupid, irrational, and “racist” (for lack of a better term).
There are South African socialists and communists, but it’s not only about politics or economics. South Africa would still have its issues with or without communism. The legacy of colonialism, neo-colonialism, and white occupation of African land is enough.
|
Fri May 23, 2025 3:08 pm |
|
 |
DP07
The Thirteenth Floor
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am Posts: 15522 Location: Everywhere
|
 Re: International politics (China, Russia, UK, etc.)
Again, it probably fits the definition of Milo Yiannopoulos’s “western supremacy” better, but whatever the case may be, you’re obviously trying to exploit race. Suggesting that only white people are qualified to farm African land involves racial bias, or related bias of some sort, and has disturbing implications.
|
Wed May 28, 2025 7:04 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|