World of KJ https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
Pictures in Signatures https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7815 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | MGKC [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Pictures in Signatures |
OK, this is getting a little out of hand. Some people have pictures in their signatures that are as big as the screen. YOUR AVATAR IS FOR PICTURES. I don't know why people put pics in sigs anyway, it's kinda stupid and very annoying. Can you guys tone it down a little bit? |
Author: | bABA [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
having pictures in signatures is fine. Ofcourse, like you stated, people have to be careful with the size of the signature. MG Casey, feel free to point out signatures (and names of the people) that you feel are taking up your screen. Also, do tell me what your screen resolution is. as my own resolution is quite high, i can't always judge how big an image might be. Thanks again. |
Author: | Rev [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
they don't bother me. ![]() |
Author: | matatonio [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
meh! there fine with me, i really dont find them annoying at all! |
Author: | bABA [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
@revolutions and matatonio: depending on the computer, browser and connection one uses, certain images can definetely be bothersome ... |
Author: | Rev [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
bABA wrote: @revolutions and matatonio: depending on the computer, browser and connection one uses, certain images can definetely be bothersome ... why don't we have a set standard for sig sizes? like say Korrgan's sig pic size. not to small and not too big. |
Author: | makeshift [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Anyone working on a resolution below 1280x1040 needs to be shot in the face. :razz: Seriously though, I think we should set a limit to accommodate those working on a low resolution or on dial up. Maybe 200x200 max? |
Author: | bABA [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
makeshift wrote: Anyone working on a resolution below 1280x1040 needs to be shot in the face. :razz: Seriously though, I think we should set a limit to accommodate those working on a low resolution or on dial up. Maybe 200x200 max? wel .. some people still work with 15 inches and some even with 14 inches!! so for me, the lower limit is 1024 by 768 though i wont be surprised (yet sad) that people prolly have 800 by 600 too !! we can have a standard. but i really like neostorm's sig and i don't want it go : ( dance preeetys!! |
Author: | matatonio [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
well i just saw Spidys sig, and yeah it way to big, but it doesnt bother, but maybe you can ask him to make it smaller! i hope my sig doesnt bother you Casey...... |
Author: | matatonio [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
makeshift wrote: Anyone working on a resolution below 1280x1040 needs to be shot in the face. :razz: Seriously though, I think we should set a limit to accommodate those working on a low resolution or on dial up. Maybe 200x200 max? thats to small tfor the sig =; |
Author: | zingy [ Mon May 09, 2005 4:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I don't mind them, either, but there should be a limit. When you have a signature with a huge-ass picture of Elisha Cuthbert in her panties (and I really don't mind), and someone walks in on you while you're browsing... you know, people get the wrong idea. |
Author: | xiayun [ Mon May 09, 2005 5:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Yeah, Spider-Man's sig is too big. The content is fine, but that is occupying way too much space and hinders others' ability to follow the conversation in the thread. |
Author: | Anonymous [ Mon May 09, 2005 5:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Not that it bothers me but Mike's is pretty big. |
Author: | insomniacdude [ Mon May 09, 2005 6:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Is my sig too big, or should I sut it down? |
Author: | BacktotheFuture [ Mon May 09, 2005 6:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Vote yes on Prop 202. |
Author: | bABA [ Mon May 09, 2005 7:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
spiderman has been sent a message. |
Author: | xiayun [ Mon May 09, 2005 8:55 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
insomniacdude wrote: Is my sig too big, or should I sut it down? Yours doesn't bother me as much since it's spaced out and not one giant poster. |
Author: | Goldie [ Mon May 09, 2005 9:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I think also that anyone whose signture pushes the page too far to the right where you can't see the edit / quote buttons and then everyones post is off line. This happens also when one posts a signature without any breaks in it. For example, I know of one that does it in a binary code like 1010101010101010........................... ******************** |
Author: | bABA [ Mon May 09, 2005 9:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Goldie wrote: I think also that anyone whose signture pushes the page too far to the right where you can't see the edit / quote buttons and then everyones post is off line. This happens also when one posts a signature without any breaks in it. For example, I know of one that does it in a binary code like 1010101010101010........................... ******************** those are the ones i'm most worried about. But i think at the moment, no one has anything like that right? |
Author: | Rev [ Mon May 09, 2005 9:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
xiayun wrote: insomniacdude wrote: Is my sig too big, or should I sut it down? Yours doesn't bother me as much since it's spaced out and not one giant poster. his bothers me cause the bottom pictures is not showing up for me. all i see is red x. :wink: |
Author: | Spidey [ Mon May 09, 2005 9:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I reduced the size of my sig. Same Elisha, just smaller. |
Author: | bABA [ Mon May 09, 2005 9:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
thank you. |
Author: | zingy [ Mon May 09, 2005 9:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
That's much better, Spidey. Thanks. ![]() |
Author: | Spidey [ Mon May 09, 2005 9:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Your welcome. |
Author: | xXVincentxX [ Tue May 10, 2005 6:11 am ] |
Post subject: | |
There, I changed mine to a more appropiate size. Is that good enough? |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |