World of KJ https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
Just ban BKB https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=58090 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Libs [ Tue Jul 13, 2010 1:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Just ban BKB |
The poor dead horses' corpses are being violated to an unhealthy degree. |
Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Libs wrote: The poor dead horses' corpses are being violated to an unhealthy degree. Jesus, do you want to have sex now or after I'm victorious with my INCEPTION prediction this weekend??? Seriously, do you have any idea how many folks have created threads in trying to Ban me and for what?? FOR NOTHING!!! Considering you've just wasted precious bandwith posting this unnecessary thread, I'll break it to ya gently that I'm not going anywhere and I'm not being Banned and the only reason your proposing this is because you want me sexually and you love bad boys and I'm YOUR Bad boy.. Now hit my music bitches.. ![]() |
Author: | Argos [ Tue Jul 13, 2010 2:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Libs is unravelled. |
Author: | Rev [ Tue Jul 13, 2010 4:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Put him on ignore, Libs. |
Author: | Chippy [ Tue Jul 13, 2010 4:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Ignoring people just makes it more tempting to read. Because you KNOW that idiocy is one click away. |
Author: | Price [ Tue Jul 13, 2010 4:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
That's why I have never put Chip on ignore. Idiocy in its full glory. |
Author: | Chippy [ Tue Jul 13, 2010 4:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
![]() |
Author: | zingy [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
BKB's lost it anyway. Back in the day when he had made up stories about a love affair with a 70-year-old named Debra and predicted $50m opening weekend for The Amityville Horror, he was entertaining. Now even he realizes how lame he is. It's sorta sad. ![]() |
Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Hmm, I don't think his BKB-typical behavior deserves a banning. I will, however, consider locking him out of the Critics forum for the next couple of months if he keeps posting in the Inception thread without adding anything substantial. |
Author: | Libs [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Dr. Lecter wrote: Hmm, I don't think his BKB-typical behavior deserves a banning. I will, however, consider locking him out of the Critics forum for the next couple of months if he keeps posting in the Inception thread without adding anything substantial. I mean, come on. Do we really need to see "INCEPTION SUXXXXXXXXXXXX ICANTZ SPELL IM ADUMBASS WEED FUCK YEAHH AMURCCA" in EVERY SINGLE THREAD on this forum? It's exhausting. |
Author: | Argos [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Dr. Lecter wrote: Hmm, I don't think his BKB-typical behavior deserves a banning. I will, however, consider locking him out of the Critics forum for the next couple of months if he keeps posting in the Inception thread without adding anything substantial. I hope it is not upon you to decide what is substantial. |
Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Argos wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Hmm, I don't think his BKB-typical behavior deserves a banning. I will, however, consider locking him out of the Critics forum for the next couple of months if he keeps posting in the Inception thread without adding anything substantial. I hope it is not upon you to decide what is substantial. It is. |
Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 10:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Libs wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Hmm, I don't think his BKB-typical behavior deserves a banning. I will, however, consider locking him out of the Critics forum for the next couple of months if he keeps posting in the Inception thread without adding anything substantial. I mean, come on. Do we really need to see "INCEPTION SUXXXXXXXXXXXX ICANTZ SPELL IM ADUMBASS WEED FUCK YEAHH AMURCCA" in EVERY SINGLE THREAD on this forum? It's exhausting. No, just send me (or the mods) examples when it gets too much and it might get deleted. |
Author: | El Maskado [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 11:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Tony Stark wrote: you want me sexually and you love bad boys and I'm YOUR Bad boy.. Now hit my music bitches.. ![]() Anyhow BKB would eventually self-ban himself with some stupid bet hes probably going to make. |
Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Libs wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Hmm, I don't think his BKB-typical behavior deserves a banning. I will, however, consider locking him out of the Critics forum for the next couple of months if he keeps posting in the Inception thread without adding anything substantial. I mean, come on. Do we really need to see "INCEPTION SUXXXXXXXXXXXX ICANTZ SPELL IM ADUMBASS WEED FUCK YEAHH AMURCCA" in EVERY SINGLE THREAD on this forum? It's exhausting. Actually, it's spelled INCEPTION SUCKS, not with an XXXXXXXXX School teacher wannabe.. ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Michael A [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:22 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Dr. Lecter wrote: Libs wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Hmm, I don't think his BKB-typical behavior deserves a banning. I will, however, consider locking him out of the Critics forum for the next couple of months if he keeps posting in the Inception thread without adding anything substantial. I mean, come on. Do we really need to see "INCEPTION SUXXXXXXXXXXXX ICANTZ SPELL IM ADUMBASS WEED FUCK YEAHH AMURCCA" in EVERY SINGLE THREAD on this forum? It's exhausting. No, just send me (or the mods) examples when it gets too much and it might get deleted. Every post he makes is too much, so rather than taking the time to delete all of his posts you could just ban him. He does not even attempt to contribute anything of value, thus he should not be here. I find it really silly that Argos was banned from this site but BKB and Grill have not been. |
Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Michael A wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Libs wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Hmm, I don't think his BKB-typical behavior deserves a banning. I will, however, consider locking him out of the Critics forum for the next couple of months if he keeps posting in the Inception thread without adding anything substantial. I mean, come on. Do we really need to see "INCEPTION SUXXXXXXXXXXXX ICANTZ SPELL IM ADUMBASS WEED FUCK YEAHH AMURCCA" in EVERY SINGLE THREAD on this forum? It's exhausting. No, just send me (or the mods) examples when it gets too much and it might get deleted. Every post he makes is too much, so rather than taking the time to delete all of his posts you could just ban him. He does not even attempt to contribute anything of value, thus he should not be here. I find it really silly that Argos was banned from this site but BKB and Grill have not been. I find it really silly that your even here at this site after trash talking this site no more than what?? 3 months ago Savage??? What happened to Loyals site being the almighty savior and the place to hang for movie talk?? Hell, even Loyal abandoned his own site.. And I'm not being Banned so enough of the childish punishments for a whole lot of NOTHING.. |
Author: | Argos [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
If I were administrator, no one would be banned, not even Dr. Lecter. |
Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Wed Jul 14, 2010 3:41 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Argos wrote: If I were administrator, no one would be banned, not even Dr. Lecter. The whole concept of Banning 1 from a public forum over a movie is assinine to say the very least.. This folks is an example as to what happens when you invite all these box office contests and guessing games over popular movies to folks who take it a little too seriously like Spoiler: show |
Author: | Michael A [ Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Tony Stark wrote: Michael A wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Libs wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Hmm, I don't think his BKB-typical behavior deserves a banning. I will, however, consider locking him out of the Critics forum for the next couple of months if he keeps posting in the Inception thread without adding anything substantial. I mean, come on. Do we really need to see "INCEPTION SUXXXXXXXXXXXX ICANTZ SPELL IM ADUMBASS WEED FUCK YEAHH AMURCCA" in EVERY SINGLE THREAD on this forum? It's exhausting. No, just send me (or the mods) examples when it gets too much and it might get deleted. Every post he makes is too much, so rather than taking the time to delete all of his posts you could just ban him. He does not even attempt to contribute anything of value, thus he should not be here. I find it really silly that Argos was banned from this site but BKB and Grill have not been. I find it really silly that your even here at this site after trash talking this site no more than what?? 3 months ago Savage??? What happened to Loyals site being the almighty savior and the place to hang for movie talk?? Hell, even Loyal abandoned his own site.. And I'm not being Banned so enough of the childish punishments for a whole lot of NOTHING.. Didn't you promise to leave not only this site but all online movie sites forever if Avatar grossed over 650m WW? Guess what BKB, it broke that domestic. So you shouldn't have to be banned, you should be gone forever by your own admission. |
Author: | Michael A [ Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Arthur, if you refuse to ban him fine. But PLEASE prevent him from doing this to the critic forum: Bradley Witherberry wrote: Fantastic. What a summer movie! The Sorcerer's Apprentice combines b-movie charm with a solid, solid screenplay which provides a foundation for all the melodrama, humor, and yes, even horror in a beautifully produced cinematic oasis amidst the vast arid desert of quality know as 2010. Seriously, the screenwriters obviously "get it" - - they know that there's still a way to conjure up a crackin' good story out of the cultural archetypes of the past. They lay the exposition on thick, right out of the gate, and the viewer is immersed in the millennial old tale careening to it's spectacular conclusion on the big screen in front of us. Then all the acting was top notch - - this is my fourth Jay Baruchel film so far this year, except for the disappointment that was HTTYD, all were great films. Nicholas Cage was perfect here, what with his trademark super dry campy seriousness. Alfred Molina made a truly threatening bad guy, though with an excellent flare of comic undercurrent. And Teresa Palmer as "Becky" played the most perfectly ultra-romantic love interest - - I'm looking forward to seeing a lot more of her! If only all Hollywood products could all be this cool! The Sorcerer's Apprentice had exactly the vibe that the recent version of Sherlock Holmes needed to save it from being the unfocused drag it turned out to be. One can clearly see that producer Jerry Bruckheimer brings the best of his talents from decades of experience to bear in balancing all the elements to create this fine film. This is a movie so finely crafted, that I imagine that it would be just as entertaining to a theatre audience in 1936, 1953, 1968, 1981, 1997, 2010, and for the whole stream of years into the future. It's that timeless. It's funny... it's romantic... it's way, way melodramatic... it's authentically frightening at times... it's a non-stop unequivocal blast! The Sorcerer's Apprentice is the real deal: a well told tale - - a new classic is born. 18 out of 5. {Don't forget not to miss the super secret after-credits scene. Look out sequel, here we come!} And this is going up directly against INCEPTION this weekend??? That's a pretty good review considering how other sites have slammed this.. Any chance this could be thre stunning upset winner this weekend given it is from Disney??? If he needs to troll up box office and cinemania fine, but he has no reason to post in the critics forum at all. |
Author: | Maverikk [ Thu Jul 15, 2010 4:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
After all these years, people still don't listen to me on how to not let BKB bother them, so I don't see this as BKB's problem. Sorry. |
Author: | STEVE ROGERS [ Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
Michael A wrote: Arthur, if you refuse to ban him fine. But PLEASE prevent him from doing this to the critic forum: Bradley Witherberry wrote: Fantastic. What a summer movie! The Sorcerer's Apprentice combines b-movie charm with a solid, solid screenplay which provides a foundation for all the melodrama, humor, and yes, even horror in a beautifully produced cinematic oasis amidst the vast arid desert of quality know as 2010. Seriously, the screenwriters obviously "get it" - - they know that there's still a way to conjure up a crackin' good story out of the cultural archetypes of the past. They lay the exposition on thick, right out of the gate, and the viewer is immersed in the millennial old tale careening to it's spectacular conclusion on the big screen in front of us. Then all the acting was top notch - - this is my fourth Jay Baruchel film so far this year, except for the disappointment that was HTTYD, all were great films. Nicholas Cage was perfect here, what with his trademark super dry campy seriousness. Alfred Molina made a truly threatening bad guy, though with an excellent flare of comic undercurrent. And Teresa Palmer as "Becky" played the most perfectly ultra-romantic love interest - - I'm looking forward to seeing a lot more of her! If only all Hollywood products could all be this cool! The Sorcerer's Apprentice had exactly the vibe that the recent version of Sherlock Holmes needed to save it from being the unfocused drag it turned out to be. One can clearly see that producer Jerry Bruckheimer brings the best of his talents from decades of experience to bear in balancing all the elements to create this fine film. This is a movie so finely crafted, that I imagine that it would be just as entertaining to a theatre audience in 1936, 1953, 1968, 1981, 1997, 2010, and for the whole stream of years into the future. It's that timeless. It's funny... it's romantic... it's way, way melodramatic... it's authentically frightening at times... it's a non-stop unequivocal blast! The Sorcerer's Apprentice is the real deal: a well told tale - - a new classic is born. 18 out of 5. {Don't forget not to miss the super secret after-credits scene. Look out sequel, here we come!} And this is going up directly against INCEPTION this weekend??? That's a pretty good review considering how other sites have slammed this.. Any chance this could be thre stunning upset winner this weekend given it is from Disney??? If he needs to troll up box office and cinemania fine, but he has no reason to post in the critics forum at all. Holy fuck!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: | Michael A [ Fri Jul 16, 2010 4:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
It's the critic review thread. He expressed his opinion of a movie which led to you asking him perposturous questions about its' box office potential and making your rambling assumptions and assertions, which had NOTHING to do with the thread. |
Author: | Argos [ Fri Jul 16, 2010 6:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Just ban BKB |
This 'stay on topic, do not pass go' policy might be the worst invention since god. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |