World of KJ
https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/

WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=51493		 Page 1 of 8
Author:  Eagle [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:35 am ]
Post subject:  WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
User Discussion

This thread is for users only, candidates are not to post here. Users, please feel free to use this thread to discuss the ongoing election, the process and the candidates.

Remember, should you have a question you'd like posed to the candidates, please PM me directly. Only questions PM'd to me will be used as official questions.
Author:  Grill [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 1:46 pm ]
Post subject:  WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion-unfollowed rules
I am fine with your ruling as it is your site and I accepted the rules. I might PM you to discuss.

Thank you to all.
Author:  Cheshire Cat [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 4:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Just because i am more reading than writing does not mean that im an inferior user, i think. But decide whatever you want to.
Author:  Grill [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Cheshire Cat wrote:
Just because i am more reading than writing does not mean that im an inferior user, i think. But decide whatever you want to.


Good Point.

Don't think the number of posts matter but think if a poster is questionable then Eagle should quickly review all posts made by the posters to decide if he thinks the poster has shown a serious side to the forums. And this can be done easily by just reviewing a page or two of the show all posts by this user.
Author:  Keyser Söze [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
I am with magnus. Having minimum number of posts prevents folks from voting with double accounts. It could be an account created a while back and totally idle.

Number of posts should not be a criteria but accounts opened after elections started and those which have been idle for a long time should not be eligible.
Author:  Eagle [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
As I said in the rules of the nomination thread, each vote and the member responsible will be taken into account. A list of votes that were not accepted will be posted at the end.
Author:  Keyser Söze [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:33 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
I was looking through cheshire cat's history and loyal replied to one of his posts which really concerns me about argos.

loyalfromlondon wrote:
Cheshire Cat wrote:
Sorry, didn't see that im too late. But what the fuck are you blabering about me beeing a duplicate account?


:funny:

In other news, Argos those last two votes only came in after I said it was tie. So I'm supposed to now leave the poll open indefinitely so LOTR fans can cast 3 votes and so on and so on.

You guys take this shit way too serious. As crazy as it sounds, there are ROTK fans out there, in fact the exact same amount of fans that voted for Godfather while the poll was open. :roll:
Author:  Grill [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:41 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
shawman wrote:
I was looking through cheshire cat's history and loyal replied to one of his posts which really concerns me about argos.

loyalfromlondon wrote:
Cheshire Cat wrote:
Sorry, didn't see that im too late. But what the fuck are you blabering about me beeing a duplicate account?


:funny:

In other news, Argos those last two votes only came in after I said it was tie. So I'm supposed to now leave the poll open indefinitely so LOTR fans can cast 3 votes and so on and so on.

You guys take this shit way too serious. As crazy as it sounds, there are ROTK fans out there, in fact the exact same amount of fans that voted for Godfather while the poll was open. :roll:


Like I said above, the quality over the quantity and the time of the posts should be considered.
Author:  Dr. Lecter [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Iagree about the minimum number of posts...I think the same rule is applied to poster/film awards here as well, no?
Author:  Libs [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 5:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
I cannot choose between MikeQ and torrino. Ack. How long do we have to vote?
Author:  Grill [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 6:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Libs wrote:
I cannot choose between MikeQ and torrino. Ack. How long do we have to vote?


Think it is 14th of June or a week.

But it might not be an important question until next week when the vote will matter more unless one isn't in the top 3 of these 4 getting the most votes.

Nominate a Candidate

Your candidates:
----- Argos
----- Corpse
----- Maguire > right now
----- MikeQ.
----- Munksyuk > right now
----- Torrino
Author:  Cheshire Cat [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 6:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
shawman wrote:
I was looking through cheshire cat's history and loyal replied to one of his posts which really concerns me about argos.

loyalfromlondon wrote:
Cheshire Cat wrote:
Sorry, didn't see that im too late. But what the fuck are you blabering about me beeing a duplicate account?


:funny:

In other news, Argos those last two votes only came in after I said it was tie. So I'm supposed to now leave the poll open indefinitely so LOTR fans can cast 3 votes and so on and so on.

You guys take this shit way too serious. As crazy as it sounds, there are ROTK fans out there, in fact the exact same amount of fans that voted for Godfather while the poll was open. :roll:



I really dont know why this should be an argument for not counting my vote. As i said, i read more than i write and i know Argos because we meet every day in the same IRC channel and in a few other forums. So it's natural that im interested in the subjects/threads that Argos is interested in (the sheer fact that we discuss these subjects elsewhere should show that the whole case isnt very mysterious...). I think there are a few people who dont like Argos or want someone else to win, so they try to make up reasons against accepting my vote. Shame on you!
Author:  BJ [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 7:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Libs wrote:
I cannot choose between MikeQ and torrino. Ack. How long do we have to vote?

Vote Torrino :D
Author:  Caius [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Not to insult Cheshire Cat, but Argos is a much better writer and grammarian.
Author:  Eagle [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
A new rule has been added to the nomination thread:

6) Users who have joined the forum after this process began are ineligible to vote.
Author:  snack [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Disenfranchise those who have no voice. Nice!
Author:  Grill [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Eagle wrote:
A new rule has been added to the nomination thread:

6) Users who have joined the forum after this process began are ineligible to vote.


Think that time is > Fri Apr 24, 2009 1:24 pm > wow about 6 weeks ago.
Author:  Eagle [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:43 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Let me rephrase: Anyone who joined the forum after May 30th is not eligible to vote.

All other accounts will be dealt with as was done previously: on an account by account basis. As always, ownership reserves the right to throw out any vote at anytime for any reason.
Author:  peezj [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
i hope me voting is okay. i havent posted much for a year, corpse suggested I look into the forum more last summer, so i check sometimes on weekends away from school. am I not a full member yet?
Author:  Grill [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
peezj wrote:
i hope me voting is okay. i havent posted much for a year, corpse suggested I look into the forum more last summer, so i check sometimes on weekends away from school. am I not a full member yet?


Think everyone should vote! But whether it will count is a different story, that is up to Eagle.

But yours is a tough sell as no forum posts before today, even though you joined a year ago.

Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:26 am
Last visited: Sun Jun 07, 2009 8:21 pm
Total posts: 4

Think these cases probably need some more information and facts from user before they will ever by counted. IMO!
Author:  Grill [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
and to Eagle, I guess I didn't think of this before, this election is over the whole web-site, correct?, and not just the forums > Re: WoKJ Admin Election > so maybe forum posts aren't the only important thing!
Author:  Mau [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Libs wrote:
I cannot choose between MikeQ and torrino. Ack. How long do we have to vote?


Vote Corpse!
Author:  Grill [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Libs wrote:
I cannot choose between MikeQ and torrino. Ack. How long do we have to vote?


psst. since no poll options/totals, I did a quick re-cap for you, where they stand now as top 3 moves on....

Your candidates:
----- Argos - 7
----- Corpse - 8
----- Maguire - 0
----- MikeQ. - 8
----- Munksyuk - 1
----- Torrino - 10
Author:  snack [ Sun Jun 07, 2009 11:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
Libs wrote:
I cannot choose between MikeQ and torrino. Ack. How long do we have to vote?


Do me a solid and vote Argos.
Author:  Keyser Söze [ Mon Jun 08, 2009 12:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: WoKJ Admin Election - User Discussion
I see Munk voting for argos in the nomination thread. So is he withdrawing?
Page 1 of 8 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/