| World of KJ https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| getluv 1 week ban https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=43476 |
Page 1 of 4 |
| Author: | timothy [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | getluv 1 week ban |
Royd wrote: Christian said getluv told him he wanted it locked because it will cause more drama. 1) How does it make sense that you'd take orders from dino?! When you ban someone it's not just about the person you ban but it involves everyone else on the forum as well who interacts with that person. 2) I clearly said in the first thread that one of the reason's for wanting to know details was not for dino's sake but so that all of the rest of us can be assured that justice has been served. Did dino not pay the price for his warnings in April already with a banning? Thanks, Tim |
|
| Author: | Libs [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
I DOTH PROTEST getluv's banning is unfair. |
|
| Author: | Michael. [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
IAWTC Can we have a breakdown of the administrative process that went on here PLZ. |
|
| Author: | Christian [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Roid, I think this one is fine to stay open. As long as everyone still has valid questions and are very civil about the whole thing, then a healthy discussion about rulings and decisions can be achieved. |
|
| Author: | Korrgan [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Michael. wrote: IAWTC Can we have a breakdown of the administrative process that went on here PLZ. *a report comes in* Roid: OMG, I gotsa report!@2221! BANZZORD!!!! |
|
| Author: | El Maskado [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
timothy wrote: Royd wrote: Christian said getluv told him he wanted it locked because it will cause more drama. 1) How does it make sense that you'd take orders from dino?! When you ban someone it's not just about the person you ban but it involves everyone else on the forum as well who interacts with that person. 2) I clearly said in the first thread that one of the reason's for wanting to know details was not for dino's sake but so that all of the rest of us can be assured that justice has been served. Did dino not pay the price for his warnings in April already with a banning? Thanks, Tim Well here you go. Its starting from May. I didnt count the one directed towards me and took that one out. Still its multiple times and the ban today would have counted as the fourth I believe Quote: Nebs 85.10.62.128 Sat May 10, 2008 7:28 pm Changed username » from “getluv†to “getcarried†Eagle 71.61.90.176 Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:08 pm The following warning was issued to this user » This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=10&p=1137174#p1137174 . Getluv, You are being warned for this post and others similar to it in the same Quote: Nebs 92.37.123.98 Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:58 pm The following warning was issued to this user » This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: viewtopic.php?f=10&p=1205753#p1205753 . The poll is fine but the unneccessary attacks and having inappropiate and tasteless description attached to each user isnt especially when they didnt ask to be evaluated. Do this again and you will be sent to a one week vacation. Quote: Royd 75.1.244.215 Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:11 pm The following warning was issued to this user » Reported as a personal attack against chipmunky |
|
| Author: | Michael. [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Wait, what in the fuck? By that logic Argos should have been banned 84 times by now since he basically slanders everyone on the fucking site? And what about the power list? No one asked to be on that, and occasionally the commentary was harsh-to-cruel. Why am i not banned? You cant turn on and off this bitch switch, Roid. Dino is no different from any of the users on this site, so don't patronize and act like theres no victimization going on here. |
|
| Author: | El Maskado [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Argos is much worse and hes banned banned for months. Not really the same situation. Its not like getluv gets banned alot so I cant see the Argos comparison. Like the warning system is set up for a reason but sometimes gets bypassed if the comments are very aggressive. Im not posting the above stuff to patronize it. Its just that Tim keeps making this thread up asking where he got the warnings from. Well there it is |
|
| Author: | Michael. [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Why have i not been banned then? It feels like very little fair mediation has gone on here, and instead its just been a slap the rule book down when it suits affair. |
|
| Author: | Michael. [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
and how long does a warning last exactly, since one of those is from early April? Its now nearly August? |
|
| Author: | El Maskado [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
He had 2 warnings from April. The last four including today were from May to right now. Also I dont see how you guys are villify someone who uses the report button. At least they seem to care for the nature of the forum |
|
| Author: | Michael. [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Royd wrote: He had 2 warnings from April. The last four including today were from May to right now. That doesn't answer the question. Does a warning last forever? |
|
| Author: | Christian [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Royd wrote: He had 2 warnings from April. The last four including today were from May to right now. Does the last one count (the one that would have been sent today) even if it wasn't really issued? |
|
| Author: | El Maskado [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 10:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Michael. wrote: Royd wrote: He had 2 warnings from April. The last four including today were from May to right now. That doesn't answer the question. Does a warning last forever? Well if the two april ones disappeared and the May warnings still show up, theres the math |
|
| Author: | timothy [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
I could very well be blind but can someone show me where it says how many warnings you get before a banning? Thanks. Tim |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Unwritten rule. I'm sure they can ban you after 1 warning, it really depends on what it's for. |
|
| Author: | timothy [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Chip [Bot] wrote: Unwritten rule. I'm sure they can ban you after 1 warning, it really depends on what it's for. well that more than anything is ridiculous. what's the point of a warning system if there's no guidelines on what a warning "means"?! how is anyone to know when a warning is the punultimate one?! Tim |
|
| Author: | timothy [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
it just seems so subjective when all day we curse at eachother and then it's left up to the mods to decide which to give warnings for. i think people are pretty good at self policing here and i think it should be moreso left up the community at large (not in singular or minority form) as to when bannings occur. this place is small enough that you could even have a poll for 24 hours to see if someone is deserving of a ban. i believe in moderator power for people who come on the forum at random times for the sole purpose of destruction, but i think the forum community should be allowed to rule the general policing of its members. Tim |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Tim, don't be like that! You're smarter than that! This isn't elementary school. |
|
| Author: | timothy [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Royd wrote: timothy wrote: Royd wrote: Christian said getluv told him he wanted it locked because it will cause more drama. 1) How does it make sense that you'd take orders from dino?! When you ban someone it's not just about the person you ban but it involves everyone else on the forum as well who interacts with that person. 2) I clearly said in the first thread that one of the reason's for wanting to know details was not for dino's sake but so that all of the rest of us can be assured that justice has been served. Did dino not pay the price for his warnings in April already with a banning? Thanks, Tim Well here you go. Its starting from May. I didnt count the one directed towards me and took that one out. Still its multiple times and the ban today would have counted as the fourth I believe Quote: Nebs 85.10.62.128 Sat May 10, 2008 7:28 pm Changed username » from “getluv†to “getcarried†Eagle 71.61.90.176 Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:08 pm The following warning was issued to this user » This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... 4#p1137174 . Getluv, You are being warned for this post and others similar to it in the same Quote: Nebs 92.37.123.98 Tue Jul 01, 2008 7:58 pm The following warning was issued to this user » This is a warning regarding the following post made by you: http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... 3#p1205753 . The poll is fine but the unneccessary attacks and having inappropiate and tasteless description attached to each user isnt especially when they didnt ask to be evaluated. Do this again and you will be sent to a one week vacation. Quote: Royd 75.1.244.215 Sat Jul 26, 2008 11:11 pm The following warning was issued to this user » Reported as a personal attack against chipmunky First off, thanks for posting this. Secondly, can you answer Michael's question about why he's not banned when he does the same thing you warned against doing to chipmunky? "tasteless description attached to each user isnt especially when they didnt ask to be evaluated." That sounds like several of Michael's threads! Tim |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
There is a difference between what getluv does and what Michael does. Michael pokes fun at people for a living, and is known for joking. getluv does it out of cruelty and to be a jerk. |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
timothy wrote: Chip [Bot] wrote: Unwritten rule. I'm sure they can ban you after 1 warning, it really depends on what it's for. well that more than anything is ridiculous. what's the point of a warning system if there's no guidelines on what a warning "means"?! how is anyone to know when a warning is the punultimate one?! Tim because not all offenses are the same. i do remember reading it in the rules. some offenses will get you banned immeadeately and obviously they are more lenient than others. i think it works best. not every warning should be treated the same way, because they simply are not. |
|
| Author: | timothy [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Chip [Bot] wrote: Tim, don't be like that! You're smarter than that! This isn't elementary school. Exactly! Don't go running to teacher when a bully tells you your My Little Pony socks went out of style ten years ago and expect the kid to get expelled from school for a week for it! Elementary school is exactly what's happening here. I'd expect something more adult and community based. Tim |
|
| Author: | El Maskado [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
because I dont read Michael's thread most of the time. I usually monitor the Box office threads so whatever gets flagged, I glance at it. We have assigned mods for the Watercooler forums and they usually try their very best to sort things out as long but its difficult for them especially to Christian. Perhaps you feel the forums needs more mods, I could assign more of them |
|
| Author: | timothy [ Sun Jul 27, 2008 11:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: getluv 1 week ban |
Chip [Bot] wrote: There is a difference between what getluv does and what Michael does. Michael pokes fun at people for a living, and is known for joking. getluv does it out of cruelty and to be a jerk. That is unfair to say because you can never know that for sure until you know someones character and that's very hard to do on the forum. Everyone should be treated equally. Tim |
|
| Page 1 of 4 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|