World of KJ https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
The All-time Top 20 USA BO. And what future 400 movies? https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=999 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | Goldie [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:52 am ] |
Post subject: | The All-time Top 20 USA BO. And what future 400 movies? |
Here are the Top 20 and only 300 million USA grossing movies. DISCUSS any points you want, here are some examples. - What movies should be higher? - What movies shouldn't have made that much money? - What future 400 movies are coming in the future? 1 Titanic $600,788,188 2 Star Wars $460,998,007 3 Shrek 2 $439,823,837 4 E.T.: The Extra-Terrestrial $435,110,554 5 Star Wars I - The Phantom Menace $431,088,301 6 Spider-Man $403,706,375 7 The Return of the King $377,027,325 8 Spider-Man 2 $372,871,182 9 The Passion of the Christ $370,274,604 10 Jurassic Park $357,067,947 11 The Two Towers $341,786,758 12 Finding Nemo $339,714,978 13 Forrest Gump $329,694,499 14 The Lion King $328,541,776 15 Harry Potter and Sorcerer's Stone $317,575,550 16 The Fellowship of the Ring $314,776,170 17 Star Wars II - Attack of the Clones Fox $310,676,740 18 Return of the Jedi $309,306,177 19 Independence Day $306,169,268 20 Pirates of the Caribbean $305,413,918 |
Author: | zingy [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:56 am ] |
Post subject: | |
We can sit here and discuss what should have and what shouldn't have made what they did, but it's pointless. The movie made what it did because people wanted it, that's all. Bottom line, whatever. As for future $400 million movies, no clue. There won't be anymore this year or next year, though. |
Author: | Neostorm [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:58 am ] |
Post subject: | |
Does that star wars figure count the re-release? If it does i dont think it deseves number two. Is there a list that actually goes not by money (which changes with inflation) but with tickets sold? I think that would be more accurate. |
Author: | zingy [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:59 am ] |
Post subject: | |
neostorm wrote: Does that star wars figure count the re-release? If it does i dont think it deseves number two. Is there a list that actually goes not by money (which changes with inflation) but with tickets sold? I think that would be more accurate. I think Box_2005 had a list of that. |
Author: | Goldie [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
neostorm wrote: Does that star wars figure count the re-release? If it does i dont think it deseves number two. Is there a list that actually goes not by money (which changes with inflation) but with tickets sold? I think that would be more accurate. Yes it does, this is just the basic $ list that is posted. I agree, ticket sales would be an interesting list. |
Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Hey Goldie, move your cowardly butt to this thread and finish the discussion: http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... 8&start=50 |
Author: | Goldie [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Dr. Lecter wrote: Hey Goldie, move your cowardly butt to this thread and finish the discussion: http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... 8&start=50 Read the previous page, not very smart as you missed a previous post, I did respond. Also, nice avatar, for the girls and the ? guys, I can't imagine any straight guy posting that. Hey but to each his own. |
Author: | zingy [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Guys, back to the topic of the thread, please. |
Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Goldie wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Hey Goldie, move your cowardly butt to this thread and finish the discussion: http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... 8&start=50 Read the previous page, not very smart as you missed a previous post, I did respond. Also, nice avatar, for the girls and the ? guys, I can't imagine any straight guy posting that. Hey but to each his own. I posted that because I thought you'd like me more if you see this picture as considering all I know so far about you, it should turn you on. ![]() But I guess you liked the diaper guy more... However... you said you are going to explain "tonight" why your picks are right...that never happened. I also analyzed your picks and you never responded to that. Go here and read for your pleasure: http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopi ... 8&start=50 @Zingaling I'll leave this thread as soon as he goes over to that link and replies. |
Author: | Box [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
neostorm wrote: Does that star wars figure count the re-release? If it does i dont think it deseves number two. Is there a list that actually goes not by money (which changes with inflation) but with tickets sold? I think that would be more accurate. As luck would have it: http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=841 The top 618 ![]() |
Author: | Goldie [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:19 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Zingaling wrote: Guys, back to the topic of the thread, please. As you can see Lecter, AS USUAL, has no intention of following your instruction. Can you please delete his posts and stop his spamming, answers with no relation to the topic, before he ruins this topic and thread. Notice none of his answers relates to the question. He should have PM me if he wanted to ask that question. The TOP grossing USA deserves a thread. Please clean it up. |
Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:21 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Goldie, go and reply to that topic that I posted, don't be a coward. |
Author: | Goldie [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Dr. Lecter wrote: Goldie, go and reply to that topic that I posted, don't be a coward. Did you read Z post? |
Author: | BigMoviePimp [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
hell, Goldie, why don't you just go and reply? |
Author: | Goldie [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
BigMoviePimp wrote: hell, Goldie, why don't you just go and reply? FYI, If you read the thread, I did reply plenty and I am out the door in 10 minutes for movies. Plus I would never jump because Lecter told me to. I will reply if and when I feel like it. |
Author: | BigMoviePimp [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Goldie wrote: BigMoviePimp wrote: hell, Goldie, why don't you just go and reply? FYI, If you read the thread, I did reply plenty and I am out the door in 10 minutes for movies. Plus I would never jump because Lecter told me to. Lecter is a worthy poster of this community. Unlike you. But FYI, I checked the last page of that link Lecter gave and I see posts that you were supposed to relpy to and obviously didn't. Lack of good arguments? |
Author: | Goldie [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Zingaling wrote: We can sit here and discuss what should have and what shouldn't have made what they did, but it's pointless. The movie made what it did because people wanted it, that's all. Bottom line, whatever. As for future $400 million movies, no clue. There won't be anymore this year or next year, though. Back to the question at hand, you don't think • Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (Fox) - 5/19/04 has a chance at 400 million. I think it get 400. |
Author: | zingy [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Lecter and Goldie, here's the deal. You guys need to settle whatever conflicts you have now. Goldie, we don't care if your Goldmaster or not. If you feel the right to make a thread, go right ahead. Lecter, please stop challenging Goldie in every thread. This is a new site, and everyone has a fresh start. If you guys want to talk or trash each other or whatever, do it somewhere else. We don't need the threads for BO Discussion spammed with arguements about why Goldie hasn't responded to Lecter's comments or why Lecter's avatar has a half-naked dude. Thanks. -Zingaling |
Author: | BigMoviePimp [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
I think you are stoopeed. |
Author: | zingy [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Goldie wrote: Zingaling wrote: We can sit here and discuss what should have and what shouldn't have made what they did, but it's pointless. The movie made what it did because people wanted it, that's all. Bottom line, whatever. As for future $400 million movies, no clue. There won't be anymore this year or next year, though. Back to the question at hand, you don't think • Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (Fox) - 5/19/04 has a chance at 400 million. I think it get 400. It does have a shot, but I think it will get around $375 million. It will be very frontloaded, and I think people have been pretty dissapointed with the two other Star Wars movies. The only reason this will do more than Attack of the Clones is because it's extremely anticipated for all Star Wars fans. |
Author: | Neostorm [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
box_2005 wrote: neostorm wrote: Does that star wars figure count the re-release? If it does i dont think it deseves number two. Is there a list that actually goes not by money (which changes with inflation) but with tickets sold? I think that would be more accurate. As luck would have it: http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=841 The top 618 ![]() Wow!!! Nice list box!! Ten Commandments made a tons of money. What the hell is Doctor Zhavago about? I never heard of it. ![]() |
Author: | Goldie [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
BigMoviePimp wrote: Goldie wrote: BigMoviePimp wrote: hell, Goldie, why don't you just go and reply? FYI, If you read the thread, I did reply plenty and I am out the door in 10 minutes for movies. Plus I would never jump because Lecter told me to. Lecter is a worthy poster of this community. Unlike you. But FYI, I checked the last page of that link Lecter gave and I see posts that you were supposed to relpy to and obviously didn't. Lack of good arguments? Whatever dude, plus instead of reading just the last page, read the whole though thread, is 3 pages too much. Also, for example, I remember BABA saying that I had made good points in there. And as I said, I am off to the movies now so I won't have time to get into a discussion with Lecter. Understand! |
Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Zingaling wrote: You guys need to settle whatever conflicts you have now. Goldie, we don't care if your Goldmaster or not. If you feel the right to make a thread, go right ahead. Lecter, please stop challenging Goldie in every thread. This is a new site, and everyone has a fresh start. To me he will always stay who he is and there is no fresh start for me in this cause. The End. As long as Gold Master is here, there will be this conflict. Thanks -Dr. Lecter |
Author: | zingy [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Dr. Lecter wrote: Zingaling wrote: You guys need to settle whatever conflicts you have now. Goldie, we don't care if your Goldmaster or not. If you feel the right to make a thread, go right ahead. Lecter, please stop challenging Goldie in every thread. This is a new site, and everyone has a fresh start. To me he will always stay who he is and there is no fresh start for me in this cause. The End. As long as Gold Master is here, there will be this conflict. Thanks -Dr. Lecter Lecter, try to be a little understanding. Goldie has just as much right to post as you do, and the arguements between you two in every thread can get a little annoying. Fine, don't let it go. But, try to argue somewhere outside of the threads. Talk through PM, AIM, MSN, whatever. Not through the threads. |
Author: | Dr. Lecter [ Sat Oct 30, 2004 12:47 pm ] |
Post subject: | |
Zingaling wrote: Dr. Lecter wrote: Zingaling wrote: You guys need to settle whatever conflicts you have now. Goldie, we don't care if your Goldmaster or not. If you feel the right to make a thread, go right ahead. Lecter, please stop challenging Goldie in every thread. This is a new site, and everyone has a fresh start. To me he will always stay who he is and there is no fresh start for me in this cause. The End. As long as Gold Master is here, there will be this conflict. Thanks -Dr. Lecter Lecter, try to be a little understanding. Goldie has just as much right to post as you do, and the arguements between you two in every thread can get a little annoying. Fine, don't let it go. But, try to argue somewhere outside of the threads. Talk through PM, AIM, MSN, whatever. Not through the threads. I am not a little understanding of Gold Master, though. And internet stalkers do have less rights. Check your PM |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |