Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Jun 21, 2025 2:00 am



Reply to topic  [ 14 posts ] 
 Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later 
Author Message
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm
Posts: 12194
Post Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring opened today exactly 20 years ago.

6 movies later, billions of dollars, hundreds of awards, Amazon tv series, etc.

How long till we get a rebooted original series or 3 new sequels? Too much $$$ involved. Maybe 2031? 2041?


Sun Dec 19, 2021 1:04 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
O wrote:
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring opened today exactly 20 years ago.

6 movies later, billions of dollars, hundreds of awards, Amazon tv series, etc.

How long till we get a rebooted original series or 3 new sequels? Too much $$$ involved. Maybe 2031? 2041?


The first three are masterpieces and shouldn't be touched. Beyond that, let's see how the Amazon series goes.


Sun Dec 19, 2021 1:12 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36949
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
Agreed they are such brilliant movies it will be difficult to top them up. Plus now that we have the series maybe a reboot will not happen on the big screen.


Sun Dec 19, 2021 5:27 pm
Profile
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23327
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
SolC9 wrote:
O wrote:
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring opened today exactly 20 years ago.

6 movies later, billions of dollars, hundreds of awards, Amazon tv series, etc.

How long till we get a rebooted original series or 3 new sequels? Too much $$$ involved. Maybe 2031? 2041?


The first three are masterpieces and shouldn't be touched. Beyond that, let's see how the Amazon series goes.


Agree.

The first three were just an amazing experience. Perhaps the best ever collective cinematic experience. They still hold up incredibly well and feel more epic than anything since.

Let's see how the Amazon series fairs - though I cant see it capturing the zeitgeist as the LOTR trilogy did. I feel it will sit somewhere between WOT and GOT in quality but is that enough.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Sun Dec 19, 2021 9:45 pm
Profile
Wall-E

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2020 1:44 pm
Posts: 876
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
Amazing trilogy. I wish I could've seen them in theaters.


Mon Dec 20, 2021 3:21 am
Profile
Don't Dream It, Be It
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm
Posts: 37162
Location: The Graveyard
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
The use of practical effects really helps these films stand the test of time. They look better today than The Hobbit Trilogy does. Heck, I'd say they look better than most films in the last few years too. Besides some moments in Fellowship where green screen is pretty obvious (mostly in Moria), there are very rare moments throughout the trilogy of noticeable CGI due to the use of practical effects.

_________________
Japan Box Office

“Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.”
“We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.”
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
“You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.”
"Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."


Mon Dec 20, 2021 12:28 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 2:27 pm
Posts: 6152
Location: New York
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
Corpse wrote:
The use of practical effects really helps these films stand the test of time. They look better today than The Hobbit Trilogy does. Heck, I'd say they look better than most films in the last few years too. Besides some moments in Fellowship where green screen is pretty obvious (mostly in Moria), there are very rare moments throughout the trilogy of noticeable CGI due to the use of practical effects.


Yeah, too bad that lesson wasn't taken to heart for The Hobbit, but turning that into a trilogy in the first place was so ill-conceived and you could tell Jackson was just doing it out of obligation to the fans by the point they got around to filming it.


Mon Dec 20, 2021 4:35 pm
Profile
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23327
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
JustLurking wrote:
Amazing trilogy. I wish I could've seen them in theaters.


Have a look around and see if any theatres near you are playing these as part of the 20 year anniversary.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:15 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36949
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
MadGez wrote:
JustLurking wrote:
Amazing trilogy. I wish I could've seen them in theaters.


Have a look around and see if any theatres near you are playing these as part of the 20 year anniversary.


I keep hoping the IMAX does a trilogy, but its not very common in SG :tears:


Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:17 pm
Profile
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23327
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
Jack Sparrow wrote:
MadGez wrote:
JustLurking wrote:
Amazing trilogy. I wish I could've seen them in theaters.


Have a look around and see if any theatres near you are playing these as part of the 20 year anniversary.


I keep hoping the IMAX does a trilogy, but its not very common in SG :tears:


Yes IMAX would have been great. They showed them here back in April:

https://imaxmelbourne.com.au/movie/lord ... esentation

I would not have been able to sit for the whole trilogy though (as much as I'd love to!)

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Mon Dec 20, 2021 8:23 pm
Profile
llegó a la casa vía marítima
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 6325
Location: la gran casa de la esquina
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
Have not been topped yet as an epic film franchise and still hold up perfectly well and probably always will, the CGI is good enough. No need to ever make another because it will not compare.

They need to release an HBO Max exclusive 'Director's Cut' of The Hobbit as two films only as originally intended. If they can do it for the flop Justice League movie they can do it for this considering they were actually successful.

_________________
.


Mon Dec 20, 2021 10:53 pm
Profile
Don't Dream It, Be It
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm
Posts: 37162
Location: The Graveyard
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
Jiffy wrote:
Corpse wrote:
The use of practical effects really helps these films stand the test of time. They look better today than The Hobbit Trilogy does. Heck, I'd say they look better than most films in the last few years too. Besides some moments in Fellowship where green screen is pretty obvious (mostly in Moria), there are very rare moments throughout the trilogy of noticeable CGI due to the use of practical effects.


Yeah, too bad that lesson wasn't taken to heart for The Hobbit, but turning that into a trilogy in the first place was so ill-conceived and you could tell Jackson was just doing it out of obligation to the fans by the point they got around to filming it.


Not excusing Jackson for going all-in with the CGI, but CGI has become so dominant in the industry, I don't even think production companies even use much practical effects anymore. I watched the Pirates of the Caribbean recently and was pretty amazed by how well the first three still look for another example. And honestly, some of today's CGI looks no better or even worse than 10-15 years ago (unless you're comparing full-on CGI examples), in my opinion, because I think they mostly ONLY create characters, creatures, special effects like fire or water, and locations using it.

It's being used as a base or core rather than a means of support. If that makes sense.

Take Davy Jones in Pirates of the Caribbean. He looks just as good/better than just about anything even today due to how much effort the actor put into the physical role for the special effects department to work with. It was more of a 50/50 effort. Today? He'd easily be almost fully CGI (if not entirely).

_________________
Japan Box Office

“Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.”
“We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.”
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
“You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.”
"Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."


Mon Dec 20, 2021 10:58 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 11:11 pm
Posts: 7195
Location: Wisconsin
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
MadGez wrote:
SolC9 wrote:
O wrote:
The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring opened today exactly 20 years ago.

6 movies later, billions of dollars, hundreds of awards, Amazon tv series, etc.

How long till we get a rebooted original series or 3 new sequels? Too much $$$ involved. Maybe 2031? 2041?


The first three are masterpieces and shouldn't be touched. Beyond that, let's see how the Amazon series goes.


Agree.

The first three were just an amazing experience. Perhaps the best ever collective cinematic experience. They still hold up incredibly well and feel more epic than anything since.

Let's see how the Amazon series fairs - though I cant see it capturing the zeitgeist as the LOTR trilogy did. I feel it will sit somewhere between WOT and GOT in quality but is that enough.


Wheel of Time is very good quality, and Game of Thrones was excellent quality. If the Amazon LOTR series falls in that range I'd be satisfied.


Mon Dec 20, 2021 11:48 pm
Profile WWW
llegó a la casa vía marítima
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:53 pm
Posts: 6325
Location: la gran casa de la esquina
Post Re: Lord of The Rings - 20 Years Later
Corpse wrote:
Jiffy wrote:
Corpse wrote:
The use of practical effects really helps these films stand the test of time. They look better today than The Hobbit Trilogy does. Heck, I'd say they look better than most films in the last few years too. Besides some moments in Fellowship where green screen is pretty obvious (mostly in Moria), there are very rare moments throughout the trilogy of noticeable CGI due to the use of practical effects.


Yeah, too bad that lesson wasn't taken to heart for The Hobbit, but turning that into a trilogy in the first place was so ill-conceived and you could tell Jackson was just doing it out of obligation to the fans by the point they got around to filming it.


Not excusing Jackson for going all-in with the CGI, but CGI has become so dominant in the industry, I don't even think production companies even use much practical effects anymore. I watched the Pirates of the Caribbean recently and was pretty amazed by how well the first three still look for another example. And honestly, some of today's CGI looks no better or even worse than 10-15 years ago (unless you're comparing full-on CGI examples), in my opinion, because I think they mostly ONLY create characters, creatures, special effects like fire or water, and locations using it.

It's being used as a base or core rather than a means of support. If that makes sense.

Take Davy Jones in Pirates of the Caribbean. He looks just as good/better than just about anything even today due to how much effort the actor put into the physical role for the special effects department to work with. It was more of a 50/50 effort. Today? He'd easily be almost fully CGI (if not entirely).


Davy Jones in Dead Man's Chest in particular is still one of the most impressive CGI creations ever. He looks SO real in some shots it's unnerving.

Image

_________________
.


Tue Dec 21, 2021 4:17 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 14 posts ] 

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: publicenemy#1 and 81 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.