| World of KJ https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| Theater Counts: March 18th (Ring 2:3,332/Ice Princess:2,501) https://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=5590 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Spidey [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Theater Counts: March 18th (Ring 2:3,332/Ice Princess:2,501) |
NEW The Ring Two - 3,332 Ice Princess - 2,501 Steamboy - 39 Melinda and Melinda - 1 INCREASING The Pacifier - 3,181 (+15) Hostage - 2,183 (+60) Racing Stripes - 358 (+156) Bride and Prejudice - 288 (+6) The Upside of Anger - 153 (+144) DECREASING Hitch - 2,703 (-272) Be Cool - 2,660 (-556) Million Dollar Baby - 2,210 (-165) Constantine - 1,670 (-500) Diary of a Mad Black Woman - 1,279 (-326) Man of the House - 1,056 (-847) Cursed - 812 (-875) The Aviator - 718 (-284) Sideways - 585 (-222) The Jacket - 502 (-829) Hotel Rwanda - 362 (-123) Meet the Fockers - 350 (-47) Finding Neverland - 348 (-152) The Passion Recut - 274 (-680) The Wedding Date - 265 (-127) The Phantom of the Opera - 223 (-112) REMAINING THE SAME Robots - 3,776 Source: http://boxofficemojo.com/counts/chart/?yr=2005&wk=11&p=.htm |
|
| Author: | neo_wolf [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Not as much as i expected for Ring 2 but still good. |
|
| Author: | Eagle [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Robots can get almost 3800 and Ring 2 can't manage 3500? Hrmm. I know Robots is a kid's movie and anything 3200+ is very good, but that still suprises me. |
|
| Author: | Jiffy [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I like this, actually, it's rather refreshing to see an event film not go the over-super-saturation route, heh. |
|
| Author: | Maverikk [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I thought for sure that M$B would start pulling back this week and dropping some. |
|
| Author: | Michael. [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
super saturation for a horror movie isnt always a great idea; smaller theater counts for big event pictures strangely seems to sustain them better. |
|
| Author: | Maverikk [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Maverikk wrote: I thought for sure that M$B would start pulling back this week and dropping some. haha..should have read the link. It dropped 165. |
|
| Author: | Kris K [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ring Two needs $15,000 pta to pass $50,000,000 :S. Anyways ICE PRINCESS only needs a $3,600 pta to grab a nice $9,000,000 |
|
| Author: | Joker's Thug #3 [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well im changing my RIng Two predictions |
|
| Author: | Eagle [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I put the ring 2 around 17000-18500 PTA |
|
| Author: | Libs [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yep, I'm now thinking an opening in the area of $40-45M for The Ring Two. March 25 Estimates Miss Congeniality 2 - 3,100+ Guess Who - 3,000 |
|
| Author: | Spidey [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Updated. Passion Recut falls 680 theaters to 274. |
|
| Author: | El Maskado [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Also Ring 2 is getting clobbered by critics, its at 31% RT score compared with The Ring which had over 70%. I know it probably doesnt mean much but I cant remember any sequels that has almost a 40% difference between movies opening that well. It sure didnt help Matrix Revolutions or Blade Trinity that much |
|
| Author: | Spidey [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Libs wrote: Yep, I'm now thinking an opening in the area of $40-45M for The Ring Two. March 25 Estimates Miss Congeniality 2 - 3,000+ Guess Who - 3,000 Actually, Miss Congeniality is estimated for 3,100+ theaters. |
|
| Author: | Eagle [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
El_masked_esteROIDe_user wrote: Also Ring 2 is getting clobbered by critics, its at 31% RT score compared with The Ring which had over 70%. I know it probably doesnt mean much but I cant remember any sequels that has almost a 40% difference between movies opening that well. It sure didnt help Matrix Revolutions or Blade Trinity that much Shouldn't effect the opening, but don't expect a 10x multiplier ... legs should be 3.0 if lucky |
|
| Author: | Jiffy [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
People forget that The Ring was never all that critically lauded in the first place. As long as TR2 brings the scares, people likely won't care. |
|
| Author: | Libs [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jiffy208 wrote: People forget that The Ring was never all that critically lauded in the first place. As long as TR2 brings the scares, people likely won't care. Yup, I recall reading negative reviews from both Roger Ebert and James Berardinelli. |
|
| Author: | Maverikk [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Jiffy208 wrote: People forget that The Ring was never all that critically lauded in the first place. As long as TR2 brings the scares, people likely won't care. It doesn't even have to bring the scares, people just have to want to be scared, and they'll exaggerate the heck out of how scary it is like they did to the first one. :yikes: For all of your sakes, I am rooting for this at the box office, and you know why. :candle: |
|
| Author: | Jeff [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Much lower then expected for The Ring Two. Good for Ice Princess, but very bad for The Passion Recut. Will it even make $500,000? |
|
| Author: | Anonymous [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Libs wrote: Jiffy208 wrote: People forget that The Ring was never all that critically lauded in the first place. As long as TR2 brings the scares, people likely won't care. Yup, I recall reading negative reviews from both Roger Ebert and James Berardinelli. Ebert gave it 2 stars, I wonder how the sequel will fare. |
|
| Author: | El Maskado [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Libs wrote: Jiffy208 wrote: People forget that The Ring was never all that critically lauded in the first place. As long as TR2 brings the scares, people likely won't care. Yup, I recall reading negative reviews from both Roger Ebert and James Berardinelli. http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1116705-ring/ The Ring had 73% approval compared to Ring 2 which would stay around 30%. Thats a 40% difference in grade. Sure it may not hurt the opening but the legs will be affected |
|
| Author: | Jiffy [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 6:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
How can you say it'll stay at 30% when it only has like 20-30 reviews? |
|
| Author: | Michael. [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Criticproof horror. |
|
| Author: | zingy [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dreamworks dropped the ball on this one. They should have opened it wider. |
|
| Author: | Andrew [ Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Lower than expected for The Ring Two, it may harm its opening weekend. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|