Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Apr 28, 2024 5:45 am



Reply to topic  [ 75 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
 March 11-13 predictions 
Author Message
Kiera Knightly is my lady!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:18 pm
Posts: 8773
Location: New Mexico
Post March 11-13 predictions
Yup, you know what to do.

_________________
Isn't it ironic that Hollywood mocks Gibson for drunk driving yet praises Polanski who molested a child? Or praises Edward Kenedy who killed someone while drunk driving?


Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:36 pm
Profile WWW
Kiera Knightly is my lady!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:18 pm
Posts: 8773
Location: New Mexico
Post 
mine: (top 8 only)
1. Robots 55.0
2. Pacifier 16.0
3. Be Cool 12.0
4. Million Dollar Baby 7.5
5. Hitch 6.8
6. Black Woman 5.9
7. Hostage 4.5
8. Constantine 3.1

_________________
Isn't it ironic that Hollywood mocks Gibson for drunk driving yet praises Polanski who molested a child? Or praises Edward Kenedy who killed someone while drunk driving?


Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:41 pm
Profile WWW
Horror Hound
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:44 pm
Posts: 6228
Post 
Oooh, didn't know Robots was this weekend, looks amazing!!

I think.

1. Robots- $42,000,000
2. The Pacifier- $18,000,000
3. Be Cool- $12,000,000
4. Hostage- $8,500,000
5. Hitch - $8,000,000

GO Robots!! :D


Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:42 pm
Profile
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
for now

Robots $47M
Hoatge $11.2M


Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:42 pm
Profile
---------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Post 
1. Robots - $36.5 (NEW)
2. The Pacifier - $17.4 (-40%)
3. Be Cool - $11.0 (-53%)
4. Hitch - $7.7 (-38%)
5. Hostage - $7.2 (NEW)
6. Million Dollar Baby - $6.8 (-25%)
7. Diary of a Mad Black Woman - $6.1 (-42%)
8. The Passion Recut - $4.9 (NEW)
9. Constantine - $2.6 (-55%)
10. The Aviator - $1.8 (-30%)

All The Passion Recut needs is an $80,000 PTA to top the weekend. :wink:


Sat Mar 05, 2005 5:51 pm
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48626
Location: Arlington, VA
Post 
1. Robots - $35 million
2. The Pacifier - $19 million
3. Be Cool - $12.5 million
4. Hitch - $8 million
5. Hostage - $7 million


Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:07 pm
Profile
Kiera Knightly is my lady!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:18 pm
Posts: 8773
Location: New Mexico
Post 
Wow people are actully predicting insted of telling me its to early!

(thats what i get on bom every weekend now)

_________________
Isn't it ironic that Hollywood mocks Gibson for drunk driving yet praises Polanski who molested a child? Or praises Edward Kenedy who killed someone while drunk driving?


Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:09 pm
Profile WWW
Christian's #1 Fan
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
Post 
Robots -- $47 million
In line with the 2002 debut of Ice Age, which went on to make over $170 million domestically. This one has a little more competition and probably won't quite reach that total though.

Hostage -- $11.7 million
A low debut is likely in store for this latest Bruce Willis action film. Marketing towards a more mature audience and an "R" rating will both help and hurt its chances for the weekend. Competition in the later weeks will quickly force it out of theaters as well.

The Passion: Recut -- $3.70 million
If there was one lesson last year it is that when a film is strategically marketed, it can produce excellent results. The Easter re-release of The Passion of the Christ is a wise move for distributor New Market and should easily bring in another $10-$15 million for the film.

_________________
See above.


Sat Mar 05, 2005 11:18 pm
Profile
The Kramer
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 11:36 am
Posts: 23787
Location: Classified
Post 
I really don't think Robots is gonna do that well, just me.

Robots - $28.6M (in line with Scooby-Doo 2)
Hostage - $20.7M (Pulp Fiction stars strike back with 5 $20M+ openers in a row.)


Sun Mar 06, 2005 12:56 am
Profile
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25020
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
BJs early wknd outlook :cool:

1.Robots - 47.3m New
2.The Pacifier - 21.5m (-30% from last Wknd)
3.Be Cool - 13.6m (-45%% from last Wknd)
4.Hostage - 9.3m New
5.Hitch - 8.6m (-30% from last Wknd)
6.Million Dollar Baby - 8.0m (-20% from last Wknd)
7.The Passion of the Christ: Recut - 7.5m New
8.Diary of a Mad Black Woman - 7.1m (-40% from last Wknd)
9.Constantine - 3.1m (-50% from last Wknd)
10.Because of Winn-Dixie - 2.4m (-35% from last Wknd)
11.Man of the House - 2.2m (-50% from last Wknd)
12.The Aviator - 2.1m (-25% from last Wknd)
13.Cursed - 1.9m (-55% from last Wknd)
14.The Jacket - 1.6 (-40% from last Wknd)

Top Ten Total: 124.4m
Top Twelve Total: 128.7m

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Sun Mar 06, 2005 1:21 am
Profile WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post 
i see no reason why Robots will do Under $40M, the Kids really dont care if it looks horrible or not funny at all, its a damn cartoon and even better its a CGI!!!!!
if Shark Tale did $40+ i see no reason why Robots will not (i actually think the Robots trailer is much better than Shark Tale's)


Sun Mar 06, 2005 1:31 am
Profile
Kiera Knightly is my lady!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 1:18 pm
Posts: 8773
Location: New Mexico
Post 
Passion 5.0


(I wish some one else from here could post there predicts on bom also)

_________________
Isn't it ironic that Hollywood mocks Gibson for drunk driving yet praises Polanski who molested a child? Or praises Edward Kenedy who killed someone while drunk driving?


Sun Mar 06, 2005 1:34 am
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Openers:
Robots 35 million (The marketing hasn't been THAT strong and robots are way less appealing then cute furry animals)
Hostage 12 million (Lots of marketing, just not that much appeal and a smaller release)
Too bad Upside of Anger is limited, I wanted to see it. I'll get around to it eventually though if reviews are good.


Sun Mar 06, 2005 4:17 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Some of you are going way too low on Robots, do you guys honestly think Robots, a CG animated kids movie in 3600+ theaters will do equal to or less then Pacifier? I dont see that being possible.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Sun Mar 06, 2005 5:07 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
Robots will be underpredicted by many. The first reviews at RT give it the best rating possible and the trailers are very well-made. Besides that its the first big animated flick of the year. It'll do very very well. I expect no less than $48 million.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Mar 06, 2005 5:15 am
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Robots will be underpredicted by many. The first reviews at RT give it the best rating possible and the trailers are very well-made. Besides that its the first big animated flick of the year. It'll do very very well. I expect no less than $48 million.


But Williams aside, it sports no one near the calibur of the Shark Tale cast as far as drawing in the crowds, I've barely seen any ads (and I live with a bunch of toddlers who watch saturday morning cartoons), I don't think that robots are very appealing for kids, and Shark Tale had Shrek to help it out in a big way. Oh yeah, and no competition from a kids movie that will have made about 30 million the weekend before. I am rather shocked by those first two reviews go, I will have to up my prediction if they stay that good, though I'm sure they won't.


Sun Mar 06, 2005 5:24 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
MovieDude wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Robots will be underpredicted by many. The first reviews at RT give it the best rating possible and the trailers are very well-made. Besides that its the first big animated flick of the year. It'll do very very well. I expect no less than $48 million.


But Williams aside, it sports no one near the calibur of the Shark Tale cast as far as drawing in the crowds, I've barely seen any ads (and I live with a bunch of toddlers who watch saturday morning cartoons), I don't think that robots are very appealing for kids, and Shark Tale had Shrek to help it out in a big way. Oh yeah, and no competition from a kids movie that will have made about 30 million the weekend before. I am rather shocked by those first two reviews go, I will have to up my prediction if they stay that good, though I'm sure they won't.


From what I have seen, though, Robots looks to end up with rather good than bad reviews, unlike Shark Tale. Also, who really cares about the voice cast? I think their influence is overestimated. Seriously what was the last time a CGI animated feature made less than $40 million in its opening weekend?

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Mar 06, 2005 5:29 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
The pacing of the film is also quite brisk. Clocking in at around 90 minutes, the movie feels even shorter. The jokes and the action just keep right on coming, from beginning to end.

Robots is everything an animated feature should be. It’s fast paced, funny for both kids and adults, and makes good use of its animation to provide a story that could be done in no other medium. I’d say with this one, Fox has cemented their place in the world of modern animation.


Sounds like a hit :wink:

Animated movies dont need popular voice over talent to bring in the crowd. Who the hell did Finding Nemo have? Ellen DeGeneres :???:

Robots has....
Robin Williams
Ewan McGregor
Halle Berry

Thats not bad, plus it has a nice supporting cast with people such as Drew Carey, Conan O'Brien, Paul Giamatti, Mel Brooks and Greg Kinnear

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Sun Mar 06, 2005 5:35 am
Profile
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Robots will be underpredicted by many. The first reviews at RT give it the best rating possible and the trailers are very well-made. Besides that its the first big animated flick of the year. It'll do very very well. I expect no less than $48 million.


But Williams aside, it sports no one near the calibur of the Shark Tale cast as far as drawing in the crowds, I've barely seen any ads (and I live with a bunch of toddlers who watch saturday morning cartoons), I don't think that robots are very appealing for kids, and Shark Tale had Shrek to help it out in a big way. Oh yeah, and no competition from a kids movie that will have made about 30 million the weekend before. I am rather shocked by those first two reviews go, I will have to up my prediction if they stay that good, though I'm sure they won't.


From what I have seen, though, Robots looks to end up with rather good than bad reviews, unlike Shark Tale. Also, who really cares about the voice cast? I think their influence is overestimated. Seriously what was the last time a CGI animated feature made less than $40 million in its opening weekend?


November, when you used the same argument that every CGI kids movie opens high no matter what for The Polar Express. ;) Honestly though, I think this has FAR less going for it then the most similar comparison of Ice Age from 2002. It opened to 46 million and was considered a huge hit, and don't forget, that got great reviews too. It also had something to attract the kids in the form of the little rat creature and all it's shenanigans, and it had no competition, whereas Robots has The Pacifier, which will make about 18-20 million next weekend. And I don't think the reviews mattered that much for Shark Tale, it had much more going for it besides the bad reviews which Robots does not.


And Killuminati510, I'm not saying Robots doesn't have a lot of people in it. It's loaded with stars. But none of them really have any box office pull except for Robin Williams.


Sun Mar 06, 2005 5:56 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
MovieDude wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Robots will be underpredicted by many. The first reviews at RT give it the best rating possible and the trailers are very well-made. Besides that its the first big animated flick of the year. It'll do very very well. I expect no less than $48 million.


But Williams aside, it sports no one near the calibur of the Shark Tale cast as far as drawing in the crowds, I've barely seen any ads (and I live with a bunch of toddlers who watch saturday morning cartoons), I don't think that robots are very appealing for kids, and Shark Tale had Shrek to help it out in a big way. Oh yeah, and no competition from a kids movie that will have made about 30 million the weekend before. I am rather shocked by those first two reviews go, I will have to up my prediction if they stay that good, though I'm sure they won't.


From what I have seen, though, Robots looks to end up with rather good than bad reviews, unlike Shark Tale. Also, who really cares about the voice cast? I think their influence is overestimated. Seriously what was the last time a CGI animated feature made less than $40 million in its opening weekend?


November, when you used the same argument that every CGI kids movie opens high no matter what for The Polar Express. ;) Honestly though, I think this has FAR less going for it then the most similar comparison of Ice Age from 2002. It opened to 46 million and was considered a huge hit, and don't forget, that got great reviews too. It also had something to attract the kids in the form of the little rat creature and all it's shenanigans, and it had no competition, whereas Robots has The Pacifier, which will make about 18-20 million next weekend. And I don't think the reviews mattered that much for Shark Tale, it had much more going for it besides the bad reviews which Robots does not.


And Killuminati510, I'm not saying Robots doesn't have a lot of people in it. It's loaded with stars. But none of them really have any box office pull except for Robin Williams.


Well, The Polar Express made the mistake of opening five days after The Incredibles. Then again, the low-ish opening weekend was made up by an amazing total gross which everyone on here uderpredicted ;)

As I said, the voice cast really doesn't matter much for animated movies. Kids don't care if it's Mike Myers or Paul Giamatti voicing the movie. I think the trailers look really funny and The Pacifier won't hurt it as much as it will hurt The Pacifier.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:01 am
Profile WWW
Where will you be?

Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am
Posts: 11675
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Robots will be underpredicted by many. The first reviews at RT give it the best rating possible and the trailers are very well-made. Besides that its the first big animated flick of the year. It'll do very very well. I expect no less than $48 million.


But Williams aside, it sports no one near the calibur of the Shark Tale cast as far as drawing in the crowds, I've barely seen any ads (and I live with a bunch of toddlers who watch saturday morning cartoons), I don't think that robots are very appealing for kids, and Shark Tale had Shrek to help it out in a big way. Oh yeah, and no competition from a kids movie that will have made about 30 million the weekend before. I am rather shocked by those first two reviews go, I will have to up my prediction if they stay that good, though I'm sure they won't.


From what I have seen, though, Robots looks to end up with rather good than bad reviews, unlike Shark Tale. Also, who really cares about the voice cast? I think their influence is overestimated. Seriously what was the last time a CGI animated feature made less than $40 million in its opening weekend?


November, when you used the same argument that every CGI kids movie opens high no matter what for The Polar Express. ;) Honestly though, I think this has FAR less going for it then the most similar comparison of Ice Age from 2002. It opened to 46 million and was considered a huge hit, and don't forget, that got great reviews too. It also had something to attract the kids in the form of the little rat creature and all it's shenanigans, and it had no competition, whereas Robots has The Pacifier, which will make about 18-20 million next weekend. And I don't think the reviews mattered that much for Shark Tale, it had much more going for it besides the bad reviews which Robots does not.


And Killuminati510, I'm not saying Robots doesn't have a lot of people in it. It's loaded with stars. But none of them really have any box office pull except for Robin Williams.


Well, The Polar Express made the mistake of opening five days after The Incredibles. Then again, the low-ish opening weekend was made up by an amazing total gross which everyone on here uderpredicted ;)

As I said, the voice cast really doesn't matter much for animated movies. Kids don't care if it's Mike Myers or Paul Giamatti voicing the movie. I think the trailers look really funny and The Pacifier won't hurt it as much as it will hurt The Pacifier.


I'm not saying the voice cast will help the movie, most don't. However, I do believe there are exceptions, and Will Smith is THE most bankable star alive without question. And The Polar Express suceeded in the long term because of such amazing word of mouth and holiday weekends, of which Robots will not have. :razz: All those other CGI movies had some appeal to older audiences, but I've only heard groans from all but kids under 8.


Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:05 am
Profile
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post 
MovieDude wrote:

I'm not saying the voice cast will help the movie, most don't. However, I do believe there are exceptions, and Will Smith is THE most bankable star alive without question. And The Polar Express suceeded in the long term because of such amazing word of mouth and holiday weekends, of which Robots will not have. :razz: All those other CGI movies had some appeal to older audiences, but I've only heard groans from all but kids under 8.


Hmmm, I don't know how it's in the US, but over here most of my friends (who are 19-20) want to see it and so dio I...

I guess we can't discuss this to death without proving anything to each other, so we'll see next weekend.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:13 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 2:36 am
Posts: 11130
Location: Waiting for the Dark Knight to kick my ass
Post 
Polar Express took the realistic look and that turned people off, Robots has cartoony robots in it. From those 2 reviews it seems more then likely all ages will enjoy this film.

_________________
Image
"People always want to tear you down when you're on top, like Napoleon back in the Roman Empire" - Dirk Diggler


Sun Mar 06, 2005 6:16 am
Profile
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 12:23 pm
Posts: 403
Location: New York City
Post 
Robots 44.5m
Hostage 13.7m


Sun Mar 06, 2005 12:12 pm
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25020
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
Dr. Lecter wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
MovieDude wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Robots will be underpredicted by many. The first reviews at RT give it the best rating possible and the trailers are very well-made. Besides that its the first big animated flick of the year. It'll do very very well. I expect no less than $48 million.


But Williams aside, it sports no one near the calibur of the Shark Tale cast as far as drawing in the crowds, I've barely seen any ads (and I live with a bunch of toddlers who watch saturday morning cartoons), I don't think that robots are very appealing for kids, and Shark Tale had Shrek to help it out in a big way. Oh yeah, and no competition from a kids movie that will have made about 30 million the weekend before. I am rather shocked by those first two reviews go, I will have to up my prediction if they stay that good, though I'm sure they won't.


From what I have seen, though, Robots looks to end up with rather good than bad reviews, unlike Shark Tale. Also, who really cares about the voice cast? I think their influence is overestimated. Seriously what was the last time a CGI animated feature made less than $40 million in its opening weekend?


November, when you used the same argument that every CGI kids movie opens high no matter what for The Polar Express. ;) Honestly though, I think this has FAR less going for it then the most similar comparison of Ice Age from 2002. It opened to 46 million and was considered a huge hit, and don't forget, that got great reviews too. It also had something to attract the kids in the form of the little rat creature and all it's shenanigans, and it had no competition, whereas Robots has The Pacifier, which will make about 18-20 million next weekend. And I don't think the reviews mattered that much for Shark Tale, it had much more going for it besides the bad reviews which Robots does not.


And Killuminati510, I'm not saying Robots doesn't have a lot of people in it. It's loaded with stars. But none of them really have any box office pull except for Robin Williams.


Well, The Polar Express made the mistake of opening five days after The Incredibles. Then again, the low-ish opening weekend was made up by an amazing total gross which everyone on here uderpredicted ;)

As I said, the voice cast really doesn't matter much for animated movies. Kids don't care if it's Mike Myers or Paul Giamatti voicing the movie. I think the trailers look really funny and The Pacifier won't hurt it as much as it will hurt The Pacifier.


not everyone :razz:

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Sun Mar 06, 2005 12:21 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 75 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 192 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.