There is a clause saying highest vote getter the gets in.
That was Singh.
Now how stupid is this? Shouldn't all sports have a rule similar to footballs 5 year wait? I mean this guy is still at the top of his game ... why are we inducting him now? Is tiger next? Why did Singh get in over tiger? What is the difference other than the fact that Singh hasn't won as much and age?
_________________
Wed Apr 20, 2005 6:32 pm
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm Posts: 16054
Actually the highest voter gets in if he gets more than 50%, Singh had 56%...
And I agree why induct someone during in active time into the Hall of Fame?
Thu Apr 21, 2005 7:40 am
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32632 Location: the last free city
it just doesn't make sense to induct someone into any Hall of Fame when the person is still playing.
soo effin tardo
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
Thu Apr 21, 2005 7:47 am
Ripper
2.71828183
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 9:16 pm Posts: 7827 Location: please delete me
The Hall of Fame is pointless if you let in active players...I do not get this at all.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 86 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
