| Author |
Message |
|
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season It wasn't offside. Kesler's skate just caught the blueline.
Terrific game.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
| Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:17 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Rick0180 wrote: To me, whether or not it was off-side doesn't matter. Goalie made a bad play, after playing a good game. He came out too far. Now hopefully Bruins can find a way to score, to win some games. So if it was offside, that doesn't matter? Now that's stupid _________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:27 pm |
|
|
|
Rick0180
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 534
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Chippy wrote: Rick0180 wrote: To me, whether or not it was off-side doesn't matter. Goalie made a bad play, after playing a good game. He came out too far. Now hopefully Bruins can find a way to score, to win some games. So if it was offside, that doesn't matter? Now that's stupid Sure if you want to discuss all ref/ump bad calls in every game, then we can talk about it. Anyway, to the point, as I stated above. Goalie made a horrible play on that goal. Coming out that far, and not looking at 2nd guy. He had to get his team into overtime, as team needed a rest.
|
| Wed Jun 01, 2011 11:41 pm |
|
|
|
Bluebomb
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:53 am
Posts: 3007
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Y'know, for all the hoopla that Tim Thomas has received throughout the season and into the playoffs about his stellar play, Luongo has put up a very solid playoff run so far.
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2011 9:56 am |
|
|
|
Rick0180
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 534
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Bluebomb wrote: Y'know, for all the hoopla that Tim Thomas has received throughout the season and into the playoffs about his stellar play, Luongo has put up a very solid playoff run so far. He has been very good. And on Thomas, I don't think he has been great in the games I have seen him play, as he has been saved by the post a number of times. Better to be lucky, than good?
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2011 10:17 am |
|
|
|
Bluebomb
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:53 am
Posts: 3007
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Rick0180 wrote: He has been very good. And on Thomas, I don't think he has been great in the games I have seen him play, as he has been saved by the post a number of times. Better to be lucky, than good? Definitely but when it comes down to it, you can only win with luck so many times. Out there, Luongo looks poised, comfortable in net while Thomas is reaching (with style) to save pucks. Not a bad thing...just 2 different styles. Now if only Luongo can work on/stop handling the puck so often...
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:26 am |
|
|
|
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season It's impressive Luongo is sitting at a 2.17 GAA and .927 save % after those two Chicago games where he got pulled.
If he keeps it up, I think he's a shoo-in for the Conn Smythe.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict.
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:01 pm |
|
|
|
Bluebomb
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:53 am
Posts: 3007
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Impressive no doubt but on the other side of the coin, people will point to Thomas and his top save % even after he let in 4 goals twice and 5 goals twice in 1 series.
All Luongo has to do is get 3 more shutouts and the Conn Smythe is his.
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2011 1:03 pm |
|
|
|
Bluebomb
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:53 am
Posts: 3007
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Quote: Luongo, all time Game 1s:
2007 vs Dallas: W, 4 GA, .947 sv%, 138 minutes played, 72 saves
2007 vs Anaheim: L, 4 GA, .897 sv%, 49 minutes played, 27 saves
2009 vs St. Louis: W, 1 GA, .962 sv%, 60 minutes played, 25 saves
2009 vs Chicago: W, 3 GA, .903 sv%, 60 minutes played, 28 saves
2010 vs LAK: W, 2 GA, .926 sv%, 69 minutes played, 25 saves
2010 vs Chicago: W, 1 GA, .973 sv%, 60 minutes played, 36 saves
2011 vs Chicago: W, 0 GA, 1.000 sv%, 60 minutes played, 32 saves
2011 vs Nashville: W, 0 GA, 1.000 sv%, 60 minutes played, 20 saves
2011 vs San Jose: W, 2 GA, .931 sv%, 60 minutes played, 27 saves
2011 vs Boston: W, 0 GA, 1.000 sv%, 60 minutes played, 36 saves
Cumulative: 9-1, .951 sv%, 1.51 GAA 90% lock Luongo wins in game 1. Stellar.
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:13 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Rick0180 wrote: Chippy wrote: Rick0180 wrote: To me, whether or not it was off-side doesn't matter. Goalie made a bad play, after playing a good game. He came out too far. Now hopefully Bruins can find a way to score, to win some games. So if it was offside, that doesn't matter? Now that's stupid Sure if you want to discuss all ref/ump bad calls in every game, then we can talk about it. Anyway, to the point, as I stated above. Goalie made a horrible play on that goal. Coming out that far, and not looking at 2nd guy. He had to get his team into overtime, as team needed a rest. You obviously don't understand goaltending. Thomas had to be aggressive there, and rely on his defense to prevent the odd man from having a free net. _________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:32 pm |
|
|
|
Rick0180
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 534
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Chippy wrote: Rick0180 wrote: Chippy wrote: Rick0180 wrote: To me, whether or not it was off-side doesn't matter. Goalie made a bad play, after playing a good game. He came out too far. Now hopefully Bruins can find a way to score, to win some games. So if it was offside, that doesn't matter? Now that's stupid Sure if you want to discuss all ref/ump bad calls in every game, then we can talk about it. Anyway, to the point, as I stated above. Goalie made a horrible play on that goal. Coming out that far, and not looking at 2nd guy. He had to get his team into overtime, as team needed a rest. You obviously don't understand goaltending. Thomas had to be aggressive there, and rely on his defense to prevent the odd man from having a free net. I just watched it again, and the goalie went out of the net even though there was a defenseman in front blocking the puckholder, but the other guy had already broken through the last defenseman and was wide open head toward the net, but the goalie still left the net, giving the Canucks the easiest way to a goal.
|
| Thu Jun 02, 2011 3:46 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season You obviously have no idea what hockey even is.
The defenseman between Thomas and the puck made the incorrect play. If he knows a guy is free, you try to block the pass. Plain and simple.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Fri Jun 03, 2011 12:18 pm |
|
|
|
Rick0180
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 534
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Chippy wrote: You obviously have no idea what hockey even is.
The defenseman between Thomas and the puck made the incorrect play. If he knows a guy is free, you try to block the pass. Plain and simple. Still Thomas came out too far considering the other guy, the scorer, had already broken through. And as a matter of fact, he got closer to the net than the goalie, when the guy scored. So I can't believe you are arguing that Thomas didn't mess up.
|
| Fri Jun 03, 2011 1:41 pm |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season He didn't.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Fri Jun 03, 2011 3:42 pm |
|
|
|
Rick0180
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 534
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Looked at it again, and he didn't get by the goalie. But I will wait for someone else, as more than half the goal was open on the play, and the goalie just ignored the other player. Seems very wrong.
|
| Fri Jun 03, 2011 8:07 pm |
|
|
|
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21165
Location: Massachusetts
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Not sure why Thomas was going for the body check there...
Bruins coughed it up. The game was winnable and they let it slip away.
At this point the Bruins should just go after Burrows' head and do what the NHL should've done yesterday. They need to do something to shake up the series.
_________________My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
| Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:06 pm |
|
|
|
Rick0180
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 534
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Jmart wrote: Not sure why Thomas was going for the body check there...
Bruins coughed it up. The game was winnable and they let it slip away.
At this point the Bruins should just go after Burrows' head and do what the NHL should've done yesterday. They need to do something to shake up the series. Not sure how this game was winable as Bruins sure didn't dominate, and it is funny that you are bitching, as Bruins aren't the cleanest team. Anyway, maybe they should find a way to get through the Canucks defense on the ice, then maybe they could win an easy game.
|
| Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:13 pm |
|
|
|
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season That goal was definitely Thomas' fault.
Chara also had a pretty bad game. When a guy eight inches shorter than you beats you on the winning goal in overtime, you're doing something wrong.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict.
|
| Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:13 pm |
|
|
|
Bluebomb
Veteran
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:53 am
Posts: 3007
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season LOL @ Lapierre. The ultimate troll.
|
| Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:17 pm |
|
|
|
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21165
Location: Massachusetts
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Rick0180 wrote: Jmart wrote: Not sure why Thomas was going for the body check there...
Bruins coughed it up. The game was winnable and they let it slip away.
At this point the Bruins should just go after Burrows' head and do what the NHL should've done yesterday. They need to do something to shake up the series. Not sure how this game was winable as Bruins sure didn't dominate, and it is funny that you are bitching, as Bruins aren't the cleanest team. Anyway, maybe they should find a way to get through the Canucks defense on the ice, then maybe they could win an easy game. Grill, they had a 2-1 3rd period lead. If that's not a winnable game then what is? _________________My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
| Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:19 pm |
|
|
|
Rick0180
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 534
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Yes, it is very rare that any team scores in the whole 20 minutes during the 3rd period.
Surprised the NHL doesn't just cancel the 3rd period, and give the win to the leader in the 2nd period.
Sound good, Boston Fan?
|
| Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:29 pm |
|
|
|
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21165
Location: Massachusetts
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Grill, do I really have to define the word winnable for you? At what point in my post did I say the Bruins were a lock to win the game heading into the third period, or that they should've even won the game?
_________________My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
| Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:35 pm |
|
|
|
Rick0180
The Incredible Hulk
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 6:39 pm
Posts: 534
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season Well as Canucks were only 1 goal behind, then I guess the game was very winnable for the Canucks also.
So in effect, it was winnable for both teams, surprise, surprise.
Isn't Sports just great.
|
| Sat Jun 04, 2011 11:41 pm |
|
|
|
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21165
Location: Massachusetts
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season But not as winnable as it was for the Bruins since the Canucks weren't winning at that point in the game.
_________________My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
| Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:20 am |
|
|
|
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am
Posts: 21165
Location: Massachusetts
|
Re: NHL 2010-2011 Season _________________My DVD Collection
Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
| Sun Jun 05, 2011 12:42 am |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
