Author |
Message |
xiayun
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm Posts: 25109 Location: San Mateo, CA
|
Yeah, he could have been 4 under and, with the way he is driving, make a couple of more birdies for a round for ages. Now we're going to see how he holds up.
_________________Recent watched movies: American Hustle - B+ Inside Llewyn Davis - B Before Midnight - A 12 Years a Slave - A- The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A- My thoughts on box office
|
Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:35 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32582 Location: the last free city
|
2 shot lead for Cabrera after Tiger bogeyed the 11th hole.
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:44 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Tiger's just starting his collapse...
|
Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:44 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32582 Location: the last free city
|
WOW!  Cabrera almost holed for eagle two on #15.
This guy just might win it all.
and he birdied it to take a 3 shot lead.
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Sun Jun 17, 2007 5:54 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32582 Location: the last free city
|
Jim Furyk is making a charge for the lead with 3 straight birdies.
He's in second place only 1 shot back after Cabrera bogyed.
Tiger's 2 shot back now.
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:15 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32582 Location: the last free city
|
Cabrera bogyed again and now is tied for the lead with Furyk at +5 (Tiger's 1 back).
He's going to the toughest hole (18) and last one.
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:28 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32582 Location: the last free city
|
Cabrera is done (+5) n has 1 shot lead over Furyk & Woods.
Furyk is at 18th hole and Tigers at 16th.
Furyk just had a bad 2nd shot n has a long,long birdie putt to tie Cabrera.
He missed it and can only hope to place 2nd.
Woods pared 16th n is still 1 shot back with 2 holes to go.
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Sun Jun 17, 2007 6:44 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32582 Location: the last free city
|
After making a clutch par to stay 1 behind, its down to the last n hardest hole for Tiger.
He has to make a birdie to force a playoff with Cabrera.
DAMN! Tiger has a long one for a birdie. 
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Sun Jun 17, 2007 7:15 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32582 Location: the last free city
|
n it's over
congrats to Cabrera.
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Sun Jun 17, 2007 7:29 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Extremely tense match. Tiger was just NOT getting his putts to drop. He was almost perfect in every other aspect.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon Jun 18, 2007 12:07 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Thank God for Angel!
(Eldrick should change his nickname from Tiger to Choker Woods...)
|
Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:07 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
bradley witherberry wrote: Thank God for Angel!
(Eldrick should change his nickname from Tiger to Choker Woods...)
Choker Woods Woods?
That doesn't make sense Bradley. And he was never in the lead, so obviously he didn't choke.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:38 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Megatron wrote: bradley witherberry wrote: Thank God for Angel!
(Eldrick should change his nickname from Tiger to Choker Woods...) Choker Woods Woods? That doesn't make sense Bradley. And he was never in the lead, so obviously he didn't choke. I don't define choke that strictly, and coincidentally the American Heritage Dictionary backs me up with this definition and example: Quote: v. intr.
4. To fail to perform effectively because of nervous agitation or tension, especially in an athletic contest: choked by missing an easy putt on the final hole.
But actually, I do feel a little bad about being so hard on the guy. After all, he acted slightly more maturely this tournament. So I thought I should say something positive about him: "Congratulations on not missing the cut like last year, Choker!"

|
Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:39 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
I still don't understand how people can hate Tiger...
He's probably one of, if not, the greatest athlete of our time, maybe ever. He's more dominant than any other athlete has ever been, and he still has a lot of years left.
Just because he acts like the rest of us do when they have a bad game of golf?
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon Jun 18, 2007 11:46 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32582 Location: the last free city
|
Megatron wrote: I still don't understand how people can hate Tiger...
Fuck'em
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:16 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Megatron wrote: I still don't understand how people can hate Tiger...
Heh! And I'm supposed to listen to this from a guy who rated Napoleon Dynamite a D- ?!?
|
Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:24 am |
|
 |
Squee
Squee
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:01 pm Posts: 13270 Location: Yuppieville
|
bradley witherberry wrote: Megatron wrote: I still don't understand how people can hate Tiger...
Heh! And I'm supposed to listen to this from a guy who rated Napoleon Dynamite a D- ?!?
I know. That movie is not D- material. C- or C material for sure.
_________________Setting most people on fire is wrong.Proud Founder of the "Community of Squee." 
|
Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:26 pm |
|
|