|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
Gulliver's Travels
Gulliver's TravelsQuote: Gulliver's Travels is a live-action family-comedy adventure film directed by Rob Letterman and based on the 18th-century novel of the same name by Jonathan Swift, though the film takes place in the modern era. The film stars Jack Black as the title character Lemuel Gulliver with Catherine Tate as Queen of Lilliput and is distributed by 20th Century Fox. Originally scheduled for release on June 4, 2010, it was pushed back to December 24, 2010 and later changed once again to December 22, 2010. 20th Century Fox later announced on March 23, 2010 that the film would be converted to 3D. On December 13, 20th Century Fox announced that it would again move the release date, this time to December 25, 2010.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict.
|
Sun Dec 26, 2010 2:41 pm |
|
|
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
Re: Gulliver's Travels
It was dumb. Jack Black played a different character than normal: A fatass loser that likes to sing old rock songs. Jason Segal better have had a good payday.
|
Sun Dec 26, 2010 7:00 pm |
|
|
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
Re: Gulliver's Travels
What a pleasant surprise...
Gulliver's Travels is an old school kids' movie done right!
This is one of those timeless movies that hip parents can watch 25 times with their tots and happily look forward to the 26th.
I was a little skeptical about the Manhattan framing segment at the beginning, but by the time I washed up in Lilliput I was captured, and by the end was completely enchanted with this whole goofy yet earnest endeavor.
...and all this despite Jack Black! There's a guy who can kill an otherwise good movie, but here he admirably acquits himself with just the right touch of idiocy. The supporting actors, though not able to fully stretch their comic wings, set that earnest tone, and anchore the viewer's empathy. Emily Blunt, Amanda Peat, Billy Connolly, and Jason Segel are all great at playing it straight, while the other main supporting actor, Chris O'Dowd as General Edward plays it with glorious comic relish as the melodramatic foil to Gulliver. (I look forward to seeing more of him, and all of these actors - - I'd love to see them all together in a ensemble ROM-COM!)
The story, of course, is a very liberal adaptation of Jonathan Swift's classic satire (eg: the theme of war is covered off in a Jack Black musical number over the closing credits - - very enjoyably I might add). There's a streak of rather bawdy body humor running through it, that will appeal to the 5-year old pee pee joke connoisseur in everyone, plus the inclusion of modern cultural references proves to be a wise update to engage modern audiences - - the Empire Strikes Back jokes and set pieces are worth the price of admission alone. In the end, it still plays out as a broad satire of the timidness with which we may live modern life, and the rewards of occasionally changing our perspective.
Yep, this is gonna go down on the record as another one of those movies that most people simply weren't fortunate enough to see in first-run.
Nevermind, Gulliver's Travels will be enjoyed by generations to come.
12 out of 5.
|
Fri Jan 14, 2011 12:11 am |
|
|
jmovies
Let's Call It A Bromance
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm Posts: 12333
|
Re: Gulliver's Travels
Gulliver's Travels is an interesting story and could of been something cool if it wasn't for Jack Black. Black's stint is becoming a bit boring as he seems to be trying too hard now to be funny. At the same time, he also has to add some kind of annoying music act into every single film. It was memorable in School of Rock and Tenacious D, but not now, not anymore. The film is actually watchable when Emily Blunt and Jason Segel have a good bit of time on screen. Though at the same time, I feel sorry that they were attached to this. *1/2
|
Sun May 22, 2011 11:42 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|