Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Apr 26, 2024 6:25 pm



Reply to topic  [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 127 Hours 

What grade would you give this film?
A 56%  56%  [ 9 ]
B 31%  31%  [ 5 ]
C 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
D 13%  13%  [ 2 ]
F 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
Total votes : 16

 127 Hours 
Author Message
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 127 Hours
127 Hours

Image

Quote:
127 Hours is a 2010 drama thriller film directed by Danny Boyle. The film stars James Franco as American mountain climber Aron Ralston who became trapped by a boulder in Robbers Roost, Utah for nearly five days in 2003. The film was written by Boyle and Simon Beaufoy and produced by Christian Colson, who previously teamed up for Slumdog Millionaire, and John Smithson. The film was released in the United States on November 5, 2010.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Sat Nov 06, 2010 6:13 pm
Profile
Let's Call It A Bromance
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 12333
Post Re: 127 Hours
James Franco and Danny Boyle collide in 127 Hours, another best of 2010. Franco uses every frame (which is nearly all of them) he has on screen as his own perfectly and is able to transform himself into Aron Ralston. Sometimes a second take is needed to realize Franco is playing the role and for an actor to break that wall is fantastic. The scenario definitely keeps its scare the entire time, and the struggle to survive is presented much better here than it is in many other films. Boyle's direction is spot on and is much stronger than Slumdog Millionaire. AR Rahman's score is fantastic and shouldn't be looked over come Oscar time as it's tone, along with usage of some popular music, keeps the film rolling where scenes could of dragged. Franco should get a nomination for his work and hopefully this role will bring him more into the drama department because he shows he has the chops for both drama and comedy. The scene leading to Ralston's escape is fine enough to watch but still gives a bit of uneasiness. The film does reach the heart a lot and the last few minutes are particularly touching. Another sure-fire hit. ****


Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:03 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 127 Hours
Magnus fails again.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:05 am
Profile
Let's Call It A Bromance
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 12333
Post Re: 127 Hours
I can see Magnus' point of view here. The film really doesn't say much about Ralston's life outside of a couple family and girlfriend flashbacks. So I can see if someone couldn't connect to him. However, I still felt that I could connect with him well.


Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:18 am
Profile WWW
 

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am
Posts: 6245
Post Re: 127 Hours
jmovies is the most static poster ever.

_________________
Mr. R wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself.

Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.


Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:17 am
Profile
Let's Call It A Bromance
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 12333
Post Re: 127 Hours
Mr. Magnus wrote:
Michael A wrote:
jmovies is the most static poster ever.


Statically awesome.

:thumbsup:


Mon Nov 15, 2010 10:43 pm
Profile WWW
 

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am
Posts: 6245
Post Re: 127 Hours
Mr. Magnus wrote:
Michael A wrote:
jmovies is the most static poster ever.


Statically awesome.

No, that would be you. He's just statically dull.

_________________
Mr. R wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself.

Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.


Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:53 pm
Profile
Let's Call It A Bromance
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 12333
Post Re: 127 Hours
Michael A wrote:
Mr. Magnus wrote:
Michael A wrote:
jmovies is the most static poster ever.


Statically awesome.

No, that would be you. He's just statically dull.

Image


Tue Nov 16, 2010 9:08 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 127 Hours
It finally came out here. Went to check it out. Will be going again.

It was fantastic. Thought it portrayed his life very well, thought it kept a great pace, and it was exceptionally well acted. James Franco can do it all!

And the arm breaking/cutting scene was shorter than expected... but seemed much longer due to the moment of it.

****/**** A+

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sat Nov 20, 2010 10:24 pm
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: 127 Hours
It was a Saturday in late April. Aron Ralston, an engineer and canyoneering/climbing enthusiast, traveled to Robbers Roost, an area in southeastern Utah with treacherous terrain. Ralston, an über-confident lone wolf, told no one where he was going. Following a fall, he became trapped in Robbers Roost's maze of canyons, his right arm pinned under a boulder. Five agonizing days later, Ralston, dehydrated, exhausted, unable to dislodge the 800-pound boulder, and near death, chose to use a multitool's dull, small blade to amputate his arm. He survived and became an icon. He was interviewed on most major television shows and penned a bestselling memoir. Now Aron Ralston's imprisonment and escape by way of brutal sacrifice has been made into an exciting and uplifting film by one of the finest living directors, Danny Boyle (Trainspotting, Slumdog Millionaire).

As Ralston, James Franco gives a career-defining performance. He's shown significant comedic and dramatic prowess before, but never has he had a role this complex. He is the audience's emotional and physical guide. He has to capture Ralston's absent-minded, devil-may-care attitude in the first act, followed by his realization of the severe predicament he's in and his rebirth. It's an enormous challenge, one which Franco meets head-on. Ralston's real-life decision to film confessional videos and messages to his loved ones during the five-day period he was trapped is a gift to Franco; in these scenes, the actor plays braggadocio and denial giving way to despair, regret, and then resolve to perfection.

Though the film belongs, as it should, to Franco, an ensemble cast with several recognizable faces is also used well. They are often glimpsed in hallucinations and memories. Clémence Poésy (Fleur Delacour in the "Potter" franchise, as well as Colin Farrell's love interest in In Bruges) is most haunting as an ex-girlfriend Ralston regrets letting go.

Boyle's direction is, of course, top-notch. He is a director who seems to invest a great deal of passion, style, and thought into each project. He has also made nuanced and poignant films with harsh subjects, including heroin and, oh, raging zombies, and is therefore well suited to this frightening (true) material. With a pair of cinematographers, including the brilliant Anthony Dod Mantle (Dogville, The Last King of Scotland), the director is able to turn an immobile character in a limited space into a diverse, enthralling cinematic experience. Are his methods often over-the-top? Yes. There's even a shot from inside a water bottle. But Boyle's directorial decisions, no matter how outlandish, are never distracting, nor do they ever lapse into kitsch. They coalesce into a convincing, stylish whole. This is yet another example of Boyle ignoring the rules, refusing to "grow old" as a director, and finding new, quirky ways to tell a story. He also continues to prove he has fantastic taste in music. For example, Sigur Rós' nine-minute "Festival" is put to excellent use (the hairs on your arm will stand up).

This is one of the year's best films. There have been reports of people fainting during the amputation sequence. It indeed pulls no punches. Yet I didn't feel disgusted; this is not an Eli Roth film set in the desert, and the violence is not intended as low-brow horror. It is survival, a decision to live. It's beautiful and challenging, as is this film.

A

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Sun Nov 21, 2010 5:43 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post Re: 127 Hours
The psycho king meets the drama queen and they go a bouldering!

It's like the showy leading the showy. Blind. Amputee. Whatever...

Danny Boyle goes into overcompensation overdrive and takes this already overblown story into overdose.

The audience was squirming, and it wasn't with horror - - as we witness surely the most overrated scene in all of filmdom. Far from explicit, it barely registers as implied violence. Matter of fact, the implied violence in Boyle's debut Shallow Grave is far more intense. The 94 minute running time feels like 127 hours.

I can only imagine how this story would have been handled by Werner Herzog...

Plus, it's the second "Man in a Box" movie already this Fall!

(I rated Buried a 3 out of 5 on the "Man in a Box" movie grading scale and a 12 out of 5 overall.)

...and wouldn't ya know it?! 127 Hours turns out to be the loser in the autumn MIAB sweepstakes and merely rates a 1 out of 5 on the "Man in a Box" movie grading scale, and warrants an overall grade of:


2 out of 5.




(Keep your eyes peeled for 127 Hours to be headlining unintentional camp humor film festivals in the 2020's.)

((If you haven't seen this movie yet - - SAVE YOURSELF - - go see Touching The Void instead!!!))


Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:34 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 127 Hours
"Implied Violence"?

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Nov 24, 2010 3:27 pm
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post Re: 127 Hours
Bradley Witherberry wrote:
The psycho king meets the drama queen and they go a bouldering!

It's like the showy leading the showy. Blind. Amputee. Whatever...

Danny Boyle goes into overcompensation overdrive and takes this already overblown story into overdose.

The audience was squirming, and it wasn't with horror - - as we witness surely the most overrated scene in all of filmdom. Far from explicit, it barely registers as implied violence. Matter of fact, the implied violence in Boyle's debut Shallow Grave is far more intense. The 94 minute running time feels like 127 hours.

I can only imagine how this story would have been handled by Werner Herzog...

Plus, it's the second "Man in a Box" movie already this Fall!

(I rated Buried a 3 out of 5 on the "Man in a Box" movie grading scale and a 12 out of 5 overall.)

...and wouldn't ya know it?! 127 Hours turns out to be the loser in the autumn MIAB sweepstakes and merely rates a 1 out of 5 on the "Man in a Box" movie grading scale, and warrants an overall grade of:


2 out of 5.




(Keep your eyes peeled for 127 Hours to be headlining unintentional camp humor film festivals in the 2020's.)

((If you haven't seen this movie yet - - SAVE YOURSELF - - go see Touching The Void instead!!!))


How does one amputating his own arm with a dull ass knife showing muscle, tendons and a bunch of blood qualify as "Implied Violence"?? :funny: Explain this will ya??? I'll take this over all 7 SAW movies any day of the week and you know James Franco will be nominated for this movie.. My question is is how Franco could win if he's hosting the Oscars with Anne Hathaway???

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A


This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this


Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:55 am
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post Re: 127 Hours
Chipo DiCaprio wrote:
"Implied Violence"?

Watch it again or wait for the DVD to come out - - very little is actually shown.


Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:57 am
Profile
The Greatest Avenger EVER
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:02 am
Posts: 18501
Post Re: 127 Hours
Bradley Witherberry wrote:
Chipo DiCaprio wrote:
"Implied Violence"?

Watch it again or wait for the DVD to come out - - very little is actually shown.


Damn, all you need to do is watch it 1 time to get the gist of it when he finally takes that dull knife and begins tearing through skin, muscle, tendons and it's not quick either.. Perhaps the SAW Franchise has hardened you and you have higher expectations??? That's what torture horror will do for ya...

_________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2dmXF3CE04A


This kills TDKR At the box office next summer.. Get used to this


Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:04 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 127 Hours
Bradley Witherberry wrote:
Chipo DiCaprio wrote:
"Implied Violence"?

Watch it again or wait for the DVD to come out - - very little is actually shown.


I did watch it again, and it was even harder to watch the 2nd time. They showed him breaking the 2nd bone in his arm. And showed him sawing away at the tissue, as well as cutting through the nerve.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Dec 01, 2010 3:56 pm
Profile
Teenage Dream

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am
Posts: 9247
Post Re: 127 Hours
Magnus wrote:
Fast-pace, tilted shots, split-screens, tri-screens, slow-mo, reverse slow-mo, you name it.


that sounds awful.

Gunslinger wrote:
Yet I didn't feel disgusted; this is not an Eli Roth film set in the desert, and the violence is not intended as low-brow horror.


lol


Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:44 pm
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: 127 Hours
Boyle is amazing. Anyone who isn't feeling it is...I don't know, too old.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:58 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post Re: 127 Hours
Gunslinger wrote:
Boyle is amazing. Anyone who isn't feeling it is...I don't know, too old.

I'm not feeling it, and I dig the modern stylized editing of directors like Neveldine & Taylor and Tony Scott. It's certainly not a question of age - - I'm plenty old, but I'm just not fooled by the ham-handed stylings of Danny Boyle. His career started hot and has been on a downward trajectory ever since - - each movie more déclassé than the one before.


Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:59 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: 127 Hours
The only camera work that I had a problem with was right before he fell and got trapped. Very odd.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Wed Dec 01, 2010 10:02 pm
Profile
 

Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am
Posts: 6245
Post Re: 127 Hours
It's only the first ten minutes or so where Boyle's unwelcome kinetic style overpowers the film and feels very oppressive, although it's never as bad as it was in slumdog. Once Ralston is trapped Boyle still uses a lot of various techniques but in a clastrophobic environment they are much more restrained and watchable. The various multi-frame's, tilt shots, flashbacks, extreme close up's of urine, are occasionally grating but flow amazingly well considering what he's doing with the camera. Even more shocking is that despite Boyle's swagger behind the camera the film came off as a sincere, honest, simplistic illustration of the story. Franco's performance is absorbing and effective, although I generally prefered Eisnberg in Social Network, less flashy of a role but better acting imo. On the whole it is not a master-work of art by any means, but it tells the story with honesty and managed to be thoroughly engaging for most of it. Something like 71/2/10or***orBor3.5/5

Also, Bradley is making even less sense here than usual. The mutilation scene was actually very direct and straight forward. The scene carries on for over a minute and shows several explicit shots of the muscle, arteries, and tendons as they are cut with a dull knife and pair of small scissors. It is certainly not saw like gore, which of course would be wretched, but it is far from subtle or implied. Btw, writing that sentence is easily the most I've ever agreed with BKB on this site.

_________________
Mr. R wrote:
Malcolm wrote:
You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself.

Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.


Sat Dec 18, 2010 2:43 am
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post Re: 127 Hours
Michael A wrote:
Also, Bradley is making even less sense here than usual. The mutilation scene was actually very direct and straight forward. The scene carries on for over a minute and shows several explicit shots of the muscle, arteries, and tendons as they are cut with a dull knife and pair of small scissors. It is certainly not saw like gore, which of course would be wretched, but it is far from subtle or implied. Btw, writing that sentence is easily the most I've ever agreed with BKB on this site.

Once again, I strongly urge you to wait for the cut-by-cut analyses that will turn up on the net once the DVD is released.

The scene is not a demonstration of the FX artist's craft, but rather that of the editor. The cuts that viewers are responding to are his. It is akin to Hitchcock's shower scene in Psycho (though obviously not in the same league) - - much is intimated, little is shown.


Sat Dec 18, 2010 10:01 am
Profile
Sbil

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48626
Location: Arlington, VA
Post Re: 127 Hours
A film that is always good and occasionally excellent, 127 Hours is missing a bit of soul that makes it fall short of truly delivering a monumental impact. I thought it was a very well-done film that never quite manages to approach "greatness." While that applies to the film as a whole, it does not describe James Franco's exceptionally strong performance, no doubt the best thing about the movie. Franco is brilliant, commanding the camera's attention for the entire length of the film and coming across exactly like Aron Ralston (at least from what I've seen in interviews and such with him). Danny Boyle goes all out here again with the directorial style, and 127 Hours is certainly a fast-paced and exciting film. While I do wish I could have connected with it a bit more emotionally considering the nature of the story, Franco's performance ensures the film will be remembered. B+


Wed Dec 29, 2010 10:34 pm
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post Re: 127 Hours
It very nearly washed the taste of Slumdog Millionaire right out of my mouth.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Thu Dec 30, 2010 1:48 am
Profile
Z
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 2:20 pm
Posts: 7952
Location: Wherever he went, including here, it was against his better judgment.
Post Re: 127 Hours
makeshift wrote:
Magnus wrote:
Fast-pace, tilted shots, split-screens, tri-screens, slow-mo, reverse slow-mo, you name it.


that sounds awful.

And it is indeed this film's biggest problem. 4/10.

_________________
"Der Lebenslauf des Menschen besteht darin, dass er, von der Hoffnung genarrt, dem Tod in die Arme tanzt."
- Arthur Schopenhauer


Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:42 pm
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 41 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.