Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Apr 16, 2024 12:51 am



Reply to topic  [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor 

What grade would you give this film?
A 7%  7%  [ 2 ]
B 10%  10%  [ 3 ]
C 24%  24%  [ 7 ]
D 38%  38%  [ 11 ]
F 21%  21%  [ 6 ]
Total votes : 29

 The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor 
Author Message
 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:01 pm
Posts: 6385
Post The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor

Image

Quote:
The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor is a 2008 American action adventure film that follows a sequel to The Mummy (1999) and The Mummy Returns (2001). The film stars Brendan Fraser, Maria Bello, John Hannah, Luke Ford, and Jet Li, and was released on August 1, 2008 in the United States. The film was directed by Rob Cohen, written by Alfred Gough and Miles Millar, and produced by Stephen Sommers (director of the previous two installments), Bob Ducsay, Sean Daniel, and James Jacks. This film departed from the previous Egyptian setting.

The story has Rick O'Connell's son Alex, now an adult, discovering the tomb of The First Emperor of China, Emperor Han. This leads Rick and his wife Evelyn to travel to China, where an evil Chinese general causes the resurrection of the Emperor. The Emperor then tries to break an ancient curse set on him by the witch Zi Yuan so he can use his magical powers to bring his army back to life to conquer the world. The emperor, "Emperor Han" in the film, is based on Qin Shi Huangdi of the Qin Dynasty, and the first emperor of China, not the first Emperor of the Han Dynasty, Emperor Gaozu of Han.

_________________
---!!---!!!!!!-11!!---!!---11---11!!!--!!--


Fri Jul 18, 2008 10:15 am
Profile WWW
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
[can be found on main page]

Despite a seven-year hiatus and the loss of one of its leads, the 'Mummy' franchise jumps right back into the action without any problems. It's willing to change up the story a bit, giving us a new Mummy character and setting as opposed to one featuring that Egyptian guy from the first two, but it also manages to retain all the things about the earlier films that made them popular - that is, a proper mix of action-adventure and a light-hearted tone.

Brendan Fraser is back as Rick O'Connell, the Indiana Jones-inspired hero from the original films, and by this point, he really has his character down. In fact, I think he was much more comfortable here than he was in the original films, maybe because he has improved as an actor over the past seven years, or maybe because he doesn't try to make his character any more than it should be, and it's a refreshing thing to see. Returning to the role of Jonathan Carnahan, Rick's brother-in-law, John Hannah is just as strong a source of humor (and in reality, that's all that his character is supposed to bring to the table) as he was in the past.

Which leads us to the big third member of the party: Rick's wife, Evelyn. As you may know, Rachel Weisz was the actor who portrayed her in the old films, but because she was unwilling to make a third film, they had to replace her, something that often has awkward results in movie franchises. However, I must say that Mario Bello truly rose to the occasion, capturing a nearly identical voice to Weisz's, and playing the part like she isn't new to it at all. And when we first see her character, a clever joke about feeling 'like a completely different person' eases the change. There is nothing about this trio that I could find any real faults in, and this helped make the film very enjoyable.

Another bonus to waiting seven years in between installments in our digital age brings another advantage to the film: much better special effects and action sequences. And believe me: this film definitely capitalizes on this, as both a chase sequence in China early on in the film (sorta reminiscent of the Shangahi sequence in 'The Temple of Doom') as well as the final battle at the Great Wall blow away any action sequences you saw in the first two movies. So in terms of action, you'll definitely get your fair dose of awesome effects. They definitely put that reported $175 million to good use.

Sadly, everything else about this movie doesn't begin to compare to the returning stars and the action sequences (luckily, these two components make up much of the film). The Mummy in this movie is played by Jet Li, who isn't at all as cool as one might hope he'd be (he's basically Jet Li's usual martial arts master, with some occasional superpowers thrown into the mix). The film crafts his story so similarly to the background story in the first 'Mummy' movie that there's even a point where the dialogue overlaps ('Nobody is to touch her'). It was disappointingly obvious that his story existed purely to create conflict for the protagonists and to set up some awesome action moments.

But the disappointments don't end there. Joining Rick, Evelyn, and Jonathan on their quest to stop the Mummy are Rick and Evelyn's son, Alex (Luke Ford), and an immortal woman named Lin (Isabella Leong) whose job is to protect the contents of the very tomb that Alex inadvertently helped bring back to life. These two characters form a romance along the way, setting up some great moments for both Fraser and Bello as their son's curious parents. The only problem is that these two lovers are played by some very weak actors, especially Lin. Alex comes across as more of a playboy than an adventurer (which doesn't make sense when characters comment on how much he reminds them of his father), and every time Lin spoke, my friend and I had a bit of trouble holding back the laughs.

Another problem the film faces is that some of the time, things just don't make sense. I won't get into details, but there is a scene where Lin calls upon some yeti-esque creatures to help them fight the Mummy (who conveniently come in handy later on in ways that she couldn't have foretold), Lin speaks of giving away her immortality for Alex's love even though they have known each other for a day or two, and the characters continue to think that simply shooting a mummy with a gun will destroy him, even though past experience has been evidence enough that there's no use.

So while on one end we have a film bringing back three very enjoyable characters and upgrading the action sequences to fit modern-day standards, we also have a movie with a boring general plot, weak supporting characters, and a few too many 'WTF' moments. So while you're bound to be entertained, don't expect to get much else out of this picture.

B-

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Last edited by billybobwashere on Sat Aug 02, 2008 1:41 pm, edited 2 times in total.



Sat Jul 19, 2008 8:52 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General

Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:11 pm
Posts: 8202
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
If your above review is true then why are critics giving it such horrible reviews? I think everyone was comparing this to TDK. Stupid critics and internet geeks.


Fri Aug 01, 2008 6:50 pm
Profile WWW
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21632
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
LadiesMan217 wrote:
If your above review is true then why are critics giving it such horrible reviews? I think everyone was comparing this to TDK. Stupid critics and internet geeks.


Why the hell would they compare it to TDK? Your the real geek if you think that. If anything they'll compare it to Indy.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Fri Aug 01, 2008 7:24 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
I think he means that people are in such "TDK owns all" hype that all films look inferior. I don't believe general audiences think like that, but reviewers and internet nerds might.


Fri Aug 01, 2008 10:23 pm
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8636
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
No, audiences are hearing all they hype and are going lets check out TDK instead...

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Fri Aug 01, 2008 10:41 pm
Profile WWW
Teh Mexican
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
BAD, bad... BAD. Seriously, It tried so hard to be funny and it was just so unfunny and even sad. The yeti part was prolly the worst and most random thing about the movie.

Just stupid mindless fun i guess.

D+


Sat Aug 02, 2008 2:01 am
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
I'm all for sequels and stuff, but just like Rush Hour 3, this kinda lost the charm of what I liked about the first two films.

It's still pretty decent entertainment, but completely forgettable. And it felt so forced that it's hard to really enjoy. Not sure where the $145m budget went; it looked cheesy. Mario Bello did not fit well in this role at all. All attempted jokes fell flat. The plot is so random and lame. It lacks the excitement of the first two, basically.

It isn't terrible, just a disappointment.

*1/2


Sat Aug 02, 2008 2:46 am
Profile
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am
Posts: 7041
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
This certainly can't be worst than Hancock and 10,000 BC can it?
Hancock was such a turd with it's terrible script and 10,000 BC bored you to death with it's crappy pacing. Rush Hour 3 was certainly better than those two.

_________________
Calls
Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2
Lorax over Despicable Me
Men in Black 3 Under 100m
Madagascar 3 Under 100m
Rise of the Guardians over 250m


Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:15 am
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
It's about on-par with Hancock, I'd say. Hancock had a terrible script but was more entertaining overall (thanks to Will Smith and crew, really). The action in this, while decent, can get a bit...boring. I would have liked Hancock a lot more had it not been for the story.

And it's better than 10,000 B.C.


Sat Aug 02, 2008 11:19 am
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
I understand why critics - and now you guys - dislike this movie a lot...but I don't understand why then everyone seems to very much enjoy the first two, especially the very weak Mummy Returns. I thought that, if anything, this movie delivers on maintaining the feel and style from the first two movies.

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Sat Aug 02, 2008 1:42 pm
Profile WWW
Stanley Cup
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm
Posts: 6981
Location: Hockey Town
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
billybobwashere wrote:
I understand why critics - and now you guys - dislike this movie a lot...but I don't understand why then everyone seems to very much enjoy the first two, especially the very weak Mummy Returns. I thought that, if anything, this movie delivers on maintaining the feel and style from the first two movies.


billy the reason you liked it and they didnt was because you saw it before the critics, they saw it after. Pretty simple really.


Sat Aug 02, 2008 2:03 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
Jim Halpert wrote:
billybobwashere wrote:
I understand why critics - and now you guys - dislike this movie a lot...but I don't understand why then everyone seems to very much enjoy the first two, especially the very weak Mummy Returns. I thought that, if anything, this movie delivers on maintaining the feel and style from the first two movies.


billy the reason you liked it and they didnt was because you saw it before the critics, they saw it after. Pretty simple really.

Heh. :thumbsup:


Sat Aug 02, 2008 2:10 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
Bradley Witherberry wrote:
Jim Halpert wrote:
billybobwashere wrote:
I understand why critics - and now you guys - dislike this movie a lot...but I don't understand why then everyone seems to very much enjoy the first two, especially the very weak Mummy Returns. I thought that, if anything, this movie delivers on maintaining the feel and style from the first two movies.


billy the reason you liked it and they didnt was because you saw it before the critics, they saw it after. Pretty simple really.

Heh. :thumbsup:


Hey! That's the same logic you use when YOU see movies!

Except you replace critics with KJ users.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sat Aug 02, 2008 2:12 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
Jim Halpert wrote:
billybobwashere wrote:
I understand why critics - and now you guys - dislike this movie a lot...but I don't understand why then everyone seems to very much enjoy the first two, especially the very weak Mummy Returns. I thought that, if anything, this movie delivers on maintaining the feel and style from the first two movies.


billy the reason you liked it and they didnt was because you saw it before the critics, they saw it after. Pretty simple really.


Yeah, because I'm someone who's so strongly affected by critics reviews. Good point.

The first two Mummy's are a LOT more fun than this. Constantly entertaining. This isn't.


Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:13 pm
Profile
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
Jim Halpert wrote:
billybobwashere wrote:
I understand why critics - and now you guys - dislike this movie a lot...but I don't understand why then everyone seems to very much enjoy the first two, especially the very weak Mummy Returns. I thought that, if anything, this movie delivers on maintaining the feel and style from the first two movies.


billy the reason you liked it and they didnt was because you saw it before the critics, they saw it after. Pretty simple really.
that's actually a pretty good point.

yeah, the weak reviews have opened me up a bit to just how weak some elements of the film are, but honestly, nobody should be watching this movie with any expectation except to be entertained, and on that front, it gets the job done (aside from the boring prologue).

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Sat Aug 02, 2008 3:25 pm
Profile WWW
What would Jesus *not* do?
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:55 am
Posts: 829
Location: Going Up the Down Escalator
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
Mummy = decent mindless fun
Mummy Returns = poor excuse for a sequel
Mummy Tomb of Dragon Emperor = EPIC FAILURE

This film was beyond awful. Everything about it sucked major hairy ass crack. All in all a very frustrating movie going experience.

Grade F

_________________
Top ten of 2008, Updated!

1. Slumdog Millionaire
2. Wall-E
3. Dark Knight
4. In Bruges
5. Tropic Thunder
6. Young @ Heart
7. Mongol
8. The Band's Visit
9. Visitor
10. Iron Man


Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:59 am
Profile
Star Trek XI
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 10:59 am
Posts: 370
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
This was pure shit. I have no other words for such shit.


Sun Aug 03, 2008 11:23 am
Profile WWW
He didn't look busy?!
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm
Posts: 4308
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
if i went in expecting a really bad movie, i'm sure i would've felt differently about it than i did and more like the rest of y'all. guess i'm the poor guy who enjoyed it. :oops:

_________________
Image
Retroviral Videos
A film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.


Sun Aug 03, 2008 2:57 pm
Profile WWW
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 9:12 am
Posts: 3139
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
billybobwashere wrote:
if i went in expecting a really bad movie, i'm sure i would've felt differently about it than i did and more like the rest of y'all. guess i'm the poor guy who enjoyed it. :oops:


There's nothing to apologize for. You enjoyed the movie and that's all that matter. I'm sure everyone else probably wishes they were in your position where you were actually able to enjoy the movie.


Sun Aug 03, 2008 3:37 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
It was just... dull. Big action set pieces happened, but none of them were exciting. Brendan Fraser was still fun. Jet Li was a non-factor -- the Emperor isn't a threatening villain in the least. And I was constantly distracted by Maria Bello. She played the part like a junior high kid. "Okay, okay, remember to keep the English accent... keep the accent... don't put any inflection, just maintain the proper accent..."

Blah. There just wasn't much fun to be found.


Sun Aug 03, 2008 5:51 pm
Profile
Grill
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 6:38 pm
Posts: 3682
Location: Here
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
Sucked ass. So bad.
D-/F

The Mummy was great and I love to watch it
The Mummy Returns was a lot of fun with some things missing


This one felt like a direct to dvd movie.

_________________
i'm back


Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:39 pm
Profile
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
billybobwashere wrote:
if i went in expecting a really bad movie, i'm sure i would've felt differently about it than i did and more like the rest of y'all. guess i'm the poor guy who enjoyed it. :oops:


I enjoyed it for the most part as well. Brendan Fraser rocks! :yes: Loved the yetis too :thumbsup:


Sun Aug 03, 2008 7:50 pm
Profile
007
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm
Posts: 11003
Location: Wouldn't you like to know
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
Yeah Billy no need to apologize for your review, if anything it is more truthful than half of the reviews here as it is a virgin review not spoiled by the vibe brought on by critics.

_________________
Image


Sun Aug 03, 2008 9:59 pm
Profile
Another You
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:38 am
Posts: 4556
Post Re: The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor
I stiLL enjoyed it a bit, but its easiLy worse than say Rush Hour 3. I guess you were aLL expecting it to be better than TDK. :sleep:

C+


Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:47 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 44 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 28 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.