Author |
Message |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
 Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
1970s? 1980s? 1990s? 2000?
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:38 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
1970s Spielberg was the most fun.
2000s Spielberg is the most interesting.
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 1:57 pm |
|
 |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11623 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
1. 1980s 2. 1970s 3. 1990s 4. 2000s
Spielberg does much better with light-hearted films. His darker toned films are overly serious and stale such as AI and Minority Report
_________________
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:02 pm |
|
 |
Eagle
Site Owner
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2004 1:09 pm Posts: 14631 Location: Pittsburgh
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Munich?
I prefer newer Spielberg I suppose, but I still think he is the most overrated director of all time, not because he's a hack, he's anything but. Simply because he is regarded as some genius of modern film, and he simply isn't.
_________________
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:08 pm |
|
 |
Excel
Superfreak
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am Posts: 22213 Location: Places
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Darth Indiana Bond wrote: 1. 1980s 2. 1970s 3. 1990s 4. 2000s
Spielberg does much better with light-hearted films. His darker toned films are overly serious and stale such as AI and Minority Report 
_________________Ari Emmanuel wrote: I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:09 pm |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
andaroo wrote: 2000s Spielberg is the most interesting.
Because he's in a powerful enough position to be less afraid of taking risks. The Spielberg of the 1970s-1990s would never have made a film like Munich. Schindler's List was risky in the sense that it covered territory he had never broached before, but the theme, subject matter, sappy ending, etc. are not too far removed from the other Spielberg films.
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:31 pm |
|
 |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11623 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Never seen, but I can say I am not interested. I am interested in seeing Schindler's List whihc looks to be along with Amistad his only good dramatic pieces. Spielberg anymore seems to be going the way of Clint Eastwood with the gritty serious approach, where as his signature had always been with fresh characters and light-hearted magic. Now his characters are just copies of other characters. Yes that is how life is more, simple characters but dramatically driven, but yet to me a film works best when it trancends the real and is full of character. Spielberg use to be the master of that, but is starting to lose his touch in my opinion. His last great film was Catch Me if You Can, which I love very much.
_________________
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:36 pm |
|
 |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11623 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Homer Box wrote: andaroo wrote: 2000s Spielberg is the most interesting.
Because he's in a powerful enough position to be less afraid of taking risks. The Spielberg of the 1970s-1990s would never have made a film like Munich. Schindler's List was risky in the sense that it covered territory he had never broached before, but the theme, subject matter, sappy ending, etc. are not too far removed from the other Spielberg films. Who cares if it risky? Spielberg still does best with films like Raiders of the Lost Ark, Jaws, Jurrasic Park, The Last Crusade, and Catch Me If You Can.
_________________
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:37 pm |
|
 |
Jim Halpert
Stanley Cup
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 1:52 pm Posts: 6981 Location: Hockey Town
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
spielberg is amazing no matter what period of time we're looking at.
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:42 pm |
|
 |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11623 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
No matter what decade you look at he has made some duds.
Spielberg is a great director, and he has made some of my favorite films, but he isn't the best. David Lean could cook his ass in a directing conest.
_________________
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:50 pm |
|
 |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11623 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Hmmm going off of Magnus
1. 1980s
Good: Indiana Jones series, ET
Bad: The Color Purple
2. 1970s
Good: Jaws
Bad: Nothing
3. 1990s
Good: Amistad, Jurrasic Park, Hook
Bad: The Lost World
4. 2000s
Good: Catch Me if You Can
Bad: Minority Report, AI, WotW
_________________
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:00 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32630 Location: the last free city
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Jim Halpert wrote: spielberg is amazing no matter what period of time we're looking at. 
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:19 pm |
|
 |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Tough between 80's (because of the Color Purple) and 90's (Jurassic Park), both are my favorite films of his. Hmm...1980's.
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:25 pm |
|
 |
Box
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 12:52 am Posts: 25990
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Darth Indiana Bond wrote: Hmmm going off of Magnus
1. 1980s
Good: Indiana Jones series, ET
Bad: The Color Purple
2. 1970s
Good: Jaws
Bad: Nothing
3. 1990s
Good: Amistad, Jurrasic Park, Hook
Bad: The Lost World
4. 2000s
Good: Catch Me if You Can
Bad: Minority Report, AI, WotW You have the nerve to put The Color Purple and Minority Report among the bad, and Hook, fucking Hook, among the good?
_________________In order of preference: Christian, Argos MadGez wrote: Briefs. Am used to them and boxers can get me in trouble it seems. Too much room and maybe the silkiness have created more than one awkward situation. My Box-Office Blog: http://boxofficetracker.blogspot.com/
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:27 pm |
|
 |
Gulli
Jordan Mugen-Honda
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 9:53 am Posts: 13403
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
The one that makes films I like.
_________________ Rosberg was reminded of the fuel regulations by his wheel's ceasing to turn. The hollow noise from the fuel tank and needle reading zero had failed to convay this message
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:28 pm |
|
 |
neo_wolf
Extraordinary
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 10:19 pm Posts: 11033
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
IMO, he's the greatest director.
I would say he's gotten better with age, i pick the 2000s spielberg.
His misses are 1941, always, hook and amistad IMO.
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:40 pm |
|
 |
Skyblade
Wall-E
Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2006 6:07 am Posts: 883
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Jaws, E.T., and Raiders of the Lost Ark are perfect movies, and Empire of the Sun was truly a breakthrough, I found a lot of Spielberg's failures during this period weren't even interesting ones. (And then there's 1941 and Always) Savin Private Ryan and Schindler's List are good, but almost feel like obligations. However, in the 2000's, with the exception of The Terminal, his films, even his imperfect ones, feel like breaths of fresh air. A.I. was recieved rather hostiley when it came out, but there are times when I miss movies like it. It was still one of the best wide releases that summer, after The Others and Mouin Rouge! And if it were released last summer, it would have been, by and far, that best movie released.
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 3:49 pm |
|
 |
makeshift
Teenage Dream
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:20 am Posts: 9247
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
2000s. Easily.
Minority Report and Artificial Intelligence: AI are his best movies.
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:00 pm |
|
 |
The Steeeve
Star Trek XI
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 2:40 pm Posts: 331
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Jim Halpert wrote: spielberg is amazing no matter what period of time we're looking at. Agreed. Though I would say the 2000s have been his weakest decade thus far. He's made some good ones but nothing on the level of Jaws, Raiders of the Lost Ark, or Schindler's List. (though I probably should see Munich before I say that)
_________________ Close Encounters of the Third Kind
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:14 pm |
|
 |
Corpse
Don't Dream It, Be It
Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm Posts: 37162 Location: The Graveyard
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Jim Halpert wrote: spielberg is overated no matter what period of time we're looking at. I guess that was a typo? I fixed it.
_________________Japan Box Office “Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.” “We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.” “There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.” “You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.” "Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 4:31 pm |
|
 |
zennier
htm
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2005 2:38 pm Posts: 10316 Location: berkeley
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
andaroo wrote: 1970s Spielberg was the most fun.
2000s Spielberg is the most interesting. Agreed. I think I'd get more mileage from 2000s Spielberg.
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 5:05 pm |
|
 |
Price
Gamaur's sex slave
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 7:15 pm Posts: 8889 Location: Los Pollos Hermanos
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
I like 1981 Steven Spielberg. As good as it gets.
_________________
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:34 pm |
|
 |
Jailbird
Nancy Boy
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2007 2:50 pm Posts: 182 Location: Behind your back stickin a pickle up your ***Stars**
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Homer Box wrote: 1970s? 1980s? 1990s? 2000? the good husband !!!
_________________ I am at the brink of sanity !!! Between extreme intelligence !!! And split personalities !!! But i elevate to the point of reversing gravity !!! Revolutionary conceptuality spitting out of me !!! Even the dead people in my family tell me !!! They are proud of me !!!
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:43 pm |
|
 |
Darth Indiana Bond
007
Joined: Wed Jul 20, 2005 11:43 pm Posts: 11623 Location: Wouldn't you like to know
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Homer Box wrote:
You have the nerve to put The Color Purple and Minority Report among the bad, and Hook, fucking Hook, among the good?
Hook was good, a childhood favorite, it wasn't his best, but it is what he does best, fun films. I will be honest on the Color Purple, I saw it years ago, so it really isn't a honest grading of the film. But I have seen Minority Report twice and it stands as a C+. Spielberg just doesn't do serious films that well. This film had great potiential, and is most interesting pure storyline, but the execution is poor, and Cruise's character seemed cliche' no matter what people might say.
_________________
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 6:53 pm |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Which Spielberg Do You Prefer?
Pretty much a continuous downward spiral...
|
Sun Aug 05, 2007 7:23 pm |
|
|