Author |
Message |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
baumer72 wrote: It's funny, today I saw 4 films at the theater. The two guys flicks I saw were either bad or excruciatingly terrible, and the two chick flicks i saw were both very good.
I'm guessing you're referring to You, Me, and Dupree as one of the "guy flicks" - if that is true, I strongly disagree - it was an out and out "couples flick". In the audience I saw it with, out of almost continuous laughter, there were actually more audible women's laughing - responding to the many hilariously true observations of married life...
(But I do agree with your review of DWP!)
|
Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:50 am |
|
 |
baumer72
Mod Team Leader
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm Posts: 7087 Location: Crystal Lake
|
bradley witherberry wrote: baumer72 wrote: It's funny, today I saw 4 films at the theater. The two guys flicks I saw were either bad or excruciatingly terrible, and the two chick flicks i saw were both very good.
I'm guessing you're referring to You, Me, and Dupree as one of the "guy flicks" - if that is true, I strongly disagree - it was an out and out "couples flick". In the audience I saw it with, out of almost continuous laughter, there were actually more audible women's laughing - responding to the many hilariously true observations of married life... (But I do agree with your review of DWP!)
I am married as well and I didn't really see many true to life marriage observations.
_________________ Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.
|
Tue Jul 18, 2006 8:30 pm |
|
 |
Thegun
On autopilot for the summer
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm Posts: 21896 Location: Walking around somewhere
|
bradley witherberry wrote: baumer72 wrote: It's funny, today I saw 4 films at the theater. The two guys flicks I saw were either bad or excruciatingly terrible, and the two chick flicks i saw were both very good.
I'm guessing you're referring to You, Me, and Dupree as one of the "guy flicks" - if that is true, I strongly disagree - it was an out and out "couples flick". In the audience I saw it with, out of almost continuous laughter, there were actually more audible women's laughing - responding to the many hilariously true observations of married life... (But I do agree with your review of DWP!)
Lets not jump to conclusions with that last statement.
I saw Prada, thought it was good, though dragged in the end. Very Predictable, but until She started to be great at the job, I thought the movie was a lot of fun. B+
_________________ Chippy wrote: As always, fuck Thegun. Chippy wrote: I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!
|
Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:46 pm |
|
 |
Snrub
Vagina Qwertyuiop
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:14 pm Posts: 8767 Location: Great Living Standards
|
Very entertaining.
B+
|
Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:26 pm |
|
 |
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm Posts: 28301 Location: ... siiiigh...
|
Boosted by great performances from Meryl Streep, Stanley Tucci, and Emily Blunt (and a good performance by Anne Hathaway, whose character didn't annoy me as much as some people here at KJ), the movie is fairly enjoyable, but not something I'd see again.
I assume that Meryl Streep will be the nomination that people will be quietly carrying through till the nominees are announced, and she'll end up being nominated for Best Actress.
Grade: B+
That's all.
_________________ Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
Wed Jul 19, 2006 4:44 pm |
|
 |
haerpinot
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 1051
|
Despite its predictable plot the movie works with what it has surprisingly well. Meryl Streep is of course terrific, Emily Blunt is a scene-stealer and someone who hopefully will continue to get good roles - had I not known beforehand I don't think I would have recognized her as the girl from My Summer of Love, the characters are so different. Anne Hathaway was pretty good too, nothing groudbreaking or original but better than average for a chick flick. My main qualm with the film was Mr. Eyebrows aka the Simon Baker character, every scene with him in it completely, and I mean completely, dragged. It wasn't funny, interesting, I didn't care. Adrian Grenier was adorable and I love seeing Tracie Thoms in anything since she's hilarious. Paced well, clever writing, fitting music selections and just a very solid entertaining entry for this genre. I give it a B+ overall.
|
Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:30 pm |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
_________________ I'm out.
|
Thu Aug 03, 2006 11:28 pm |
|
 |
Cotton
Some days I'm a super bitch
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:22 pm Posts: 6645
|
Christian wrote: "I just started this new diet. Basically I don't eat anything, and then when I feel like I'm going to faint, I eat a cube of cheese."

|
Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:24 pm |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
I should also add that this movies success provides a lot of hope for female lead chickflicks. It really defied the odds of the genre and at the same time re-position Meryl Streep as a major lead actress. She's been spending too much time in supporting roles lately.
_________________ I'm out.
|
Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:41 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Squishy wrote: I should also add that this movies success provides a lot of hope for female lead chickflicks. It really defied the odds of the genre and at the same time re-position Meryl Streep as a major lead actress. She's been spending too much time in supporting roles lately.
Amen, Squishy. Nice review too.
|
Fri Aug 04, 2006 2:07 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
I want to seeeeeeeeeeeeeee this again.
|
Fri Aug 04, 2006 3:20 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
Libs wrote: I want to seeeeeeeeeeeeeee this again.
Ahem, where's your review lady? 
|
Fri Aug 04, 2006 6:46 pm |
|
 |
Maverikk
Award Winning Bastard
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 12:03 am Posts: 15310 Location: Slumming at KJ
|
The movie is fantastic! It's like 10 times better than Working Girl was, and Ms. Streep is exceptional as the intimidating Miranda Priestly, a performance that should get some considerations for awards. Personally, I thought that Anne Hathaway was brilliant, and based on her powerhouse turn here, I'd be expecting to see much MUCH more of her in the future!
I kept trying to place the snobby British first assistant during the entire movie, but couldn't do it. I thought for sure that I'd seen her before. Turns out that I was wrong, but she was perhaps my favorite in the film.
The script was tight. The best screenplay of the year, so far. That was a strength with In Her Shoes, and you might recall how much I liked that movie, but this was even better. I struggled with the grade, but only because I was fighting the fact that I was about to give a chick flick a higher grade than X-Men 3, a movie that I loved, but you know what, I can't deny a job well done.
A
|
Sat Aug 19, 2006 12:47 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
I just realized that, for some unknown reason, I enver actually posted my mini-review in here.
I loved it, of course. Meryl Streep is absolutely 100% perfect as Miranda Priestly...if this role does not earn her an Oscar nomination, there is perhaps no justice in the world. Anne Hathaway is solid as Andy, but outshined by Streep in every scene they appear together. Stanley Tucci and Emily Blunt are absolutely delicious in supporting roles. When a scene features Streep/Tucci/Blunt or a combination of the three actors, it crackles with energy. Just a great time. A-
I still want to see it again.
"Well, I don't eat anything, and when I feel like I'm about to faint, I eat a cube of cheese."
"The details of your incompetence do not interest me."
|
Sun Aug 20, 2006 6:52 pm |
|
 |
Jeff
Christian's #1 Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm Posts: 28110 Location: Awaiting my fate
|
I was very dissapointed I have to say. Maybe I had too high of expectations, or maybe it just wasn't all that. Streep was great, Hathaway was decent and Tucci was good but that was about it for the cast. The screenplay was good but very, very, very shallow. It just didn't work for me in the end. Good, but far from great. B
|
Sun Aug 20, 2006 9:05 pm |
|
 |
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am Posts: 40594
|
B+/B
Well I liked it a lot. For a light and breezy chick flick, I actually found it to be pretty well made as well, moreso than most other movies in it's genre. Nice screenplay and solid direction, I thought.
Meryl Streep was great, but I actually don't think she was as magnificent as everyone else here is saying, to be honest. Bitch done well, Streep being Streep, really. I actually preferred Stanley Tucci in his role, he was just brilliant. I wish he would get supporting actor buzz at the end of the year, I haven't seen the gay guy portrayed better anytime recently. Blunt did well in a comedic role as well, even at the start when she's supposed to be the opponent, you even like her there.
Hathaway has been very understated as well, I loved her here. The truth is that the character complexities did not go deep on that character, she just had to be the standard fashion assistent, and she did great. I especially loved how as the movie went on, you could see her transformation, it wasn't just her look that changed to fit the Miranda biz, but herself to go with that. She evidently loses the grandma's sweater persona, becomes someone who could take over in the future as a fashion beast, if she wanted to.
A few issues I have with the film is that while it is a breezy and fun watch, ultimately it never amounts to much more. It never sustains any emotional impact, it doesn't really handle characters in a deep way, it's just mostly a popcorn chick flick. With that being said, there's nothing wrong with excelling in that area.
Also, I had issues with the ending. I didn't like how after making all those sacrifices and completley changing into this ruthless assistent, she just walks away. I mean, she denied Emily her dream that she worked her ass off for, and once she has it she throws it all away in a waste. It was just cliche and predictable, especially that scene with the boyfriend at the end, gah. I think it would have been much more effective if the movie ended with Andy riding in the limo with Streep as fully transformed, she has become this bitch person, and now there's no going back. In that case you'd have a classic Michael Corleone thing going, and it would've been perfect.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
Mon Sep 04, 2006 3:14 am |
|
 |
Andrew
Lover of Bacon
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 7:05 pm Posts: 4197 Location: Sherwood Forest, UK
|
I finally get to see 'Prada and thankfully it didn't disappoint. Streep really was perfect in the role, i can't think of anyone else who could have pulled it off. So many quotable lines!
- Can you spell 'Gabbana'? - I'm just one stomach flu away from my perfect weight - Move at a glacial pace, you know how i love that - I just started this new diet. Basically I don't eat anything, and then when I feel like I'm going to faint, I eat a cube of cheese
Yeah it dragged a little towards the end, but it was still great fun. I think this will be immensely rewatchable.
A-
_________________ ... and there's something about this city today, like all the colours conspired to overwhelm the grey...
|
Sat Sep 30, 2006 3:06 pm |
|
 |
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm Posts: 26066 Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
Great movie. Fine performances all around especially from Meryl Streep and quite a funny movie, a lot better than i expected it to be
A
|
Wed Oct 04, 2006 10:01 pm |
|
 |
Riggs
We had our time together
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am Posts: 13299 Location: Vienna
|
A mixed bag for me. The first half was pretty amusing but the second half was like a movie I have seen a thousand times by now. Hathaway gave a good performance and Streep was great but I thought she got too much praise for her part. C+
|
Thu Oct 12, 2006 5:16 am |
|
 |
Caius
A very honest-hearted fellow
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:02 pm Posts: 4767
|
The movie was always interesting but it never really clicked with me. I completely loathed the friends and boyfriend due to their clunkiness as characters. Meryl Streep was good and often bitingly funny and Hathaway was good as always. My main problem was that none of the characters changed or at least stayed in a changed state.
C/C+, but it had potential to be much higher.
|
Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:56 pm |
|
 |
getluv
i break the rules, so i don't care
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 4:28 pm Posts: 20411
|
C+
This didn't work for me.
|
Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:00 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
I think I am getting this and Little Miss Sunshine for Chrismukkah
Yay
|
Thu Dec 14, 2006 5:22 pm |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
B+
Well, this is no high art, but still a perfectly entertaining flick even for a guy. Meryl Streep delivers a brillaitn performance that has more layers than it first seems. Truly, her character is mostly over the top, but Streep manages to put some sentimental and more serious touches to it than meets the eye at first. Anne Hathaway is decent in her role, but completely overshadowed by Streep's character. Emily Blunt and Stanley Tucci delivers very nice little turns, but both of Hathaway's blokes (Baker and Grenier) are very bland. The ending is of course expected and fairly clichéd, but so is the whole idea of the film to begin with and it never disturbes the fun. I had my fair share of laughs and grins, most of them thanks to Streep's wonderful performance which will deservingly be nominated for an Oscar.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:36 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
I had really high hopes....and was disappointed. Some of it was funny, but all the scenes of Anne Hathaway's home life (Tracie Thoms, Adrien Grenier, etc.) were such a draaaaaaaaag. They were unnecessary and destructive; they only made the movie more cliched and run-of-the-mill. It was a shame.
So ultimately....a missed opportunity.
_________________ k
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:04 pm |
|
 |
Riggs
We had our time together
Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 4:36 am Posts: 13299 Location: Vienna
|
If Streep really gets Oscar attention for this I will be really pissed.
|
Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:16 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 49 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|