Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Jul 19, 2025 10:19 am



Reply to topic  [ 112 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 Weekend Actuals 
Author Message
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post Weekend Actuals
1 new Pirates Of The Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
Buena Vista - Rated PG-13 1 4133 $135,634,554 $135,634,554 new
2 1 Superman Returns
Warner Bros. - Rated PG-13 2 4065 $21,815,243 $141,642,667 -58%
3 2 The Devil Wears Prada
Fox - Rated PG-13 2 2882 $15,014,778 $63,110,544 -45%
4 3 Click
Sony - Rated PG-13 3 3458 $11,921,513 $105,842,811 -40%
5 4 Cars
Buena Vista - Rated G 5 3379 $10,734,082 $205,908,484 -26%
6 5 Nacho Libre
Paramount - Rated PG 4 2262 $3,339,828 $73,814,240 -49%
7 6 The Lake House
Warner Bros. - Rated PG 4 2420 $2,854,457 $45,630,219 -41%
8 7 The Fast And The Furious: Tokyo Drift
Universal - Rated PG-13 4 1868 $2,549,855 $57,434,625 -43%
9 8 Waist Deep
Focus/Rogue - Rated R 3 864 $1,901,151 $19,207,640 -45%
10 9 The Break Up
Universal - Rated PG-13 6 1175 $1,621,345 $114,278,860 -46%
11 10 The Da Vinci Code
Sony - Rated PG-13 8 1012 $1,321,762 $213,210,326 -45%
12 13 An Inconvenient Truth
Paramount Vantage - Rated PG 7 562 $1,172,984 $15,050,824 -31%

http://www.ercboxoffice.com/erc/reports ... osses.html

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Last edited by xiayun on Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:52 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post Re: Weekend Actuals
xiayun wrote:
1 new Pirates Of The Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest
Buena Vista - Rated PG-13 1 4133 $135,634,554 $135,634,554 new


:lol: Dark Shape?


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Profile ICQ
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
I figured it'd be over $135 million with actuals. I'm more interested in the dailies, though.

Nice increase for Cars, too.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
Ooh... DP barely won his bet. ;)

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Profile
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
Okay, now, the big question, what is the daily breakdown? But whatever it is, it fucking made more than initially reported!!! That is c razy.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
4.4m away, so close.

135.6m is aweome get ready for 500m+

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:54 pm
Profile WWW
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
BJ wrote:
4.4m away, so close.

135.6m is aweome get ready for 500m+


No way. It will struggle to 400. This will be so frontloaded, it has to drop from here.

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:55 pm
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
not falling over 50% today

42%-49%

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:55 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
BJ wrote:
not falling over 50% today

42%-49%


I agree.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:55 pm
Profile ICQ
Mod Team Leader
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 11:00 pm
Posts: 7087
Location: Crystal Lake
Post 
That's a 3 million dollar increase from estimations!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

_________________
Brick Tamland: Yeah, there were horses, and a man on fire, and I killed a guy with a trident.
Ron Burgundy: Brick, I've been meaning to talk to you about that. You should find yourself a safehouse or a relative close by. Lay low for a while, because you're probably wanted for murder.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:56 pm
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post 
baumer72 wrote:
BJ wrote:
4.4m away, so close.

135.6m is aweome get ready for 500m+


No way. It will struggle to 400. This will be so frontloaded, it has to drop from here.


it has to drop but some are expecting a freefall :nonono: 3.8+ multiplyer

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:56 pm
Profile WWW
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 3:57 am
Posts: 4669
Location: Anchorage, AK
Post 
hell yeah, 200m in 7days for pirates guaranteed

_________________
My Most anticipated films of 2015


Image


Last edited by DIB2 on Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:57 pm
Profile
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
They are just adjusting the legs to make it closer to their original predictions.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:57 pm
Profile ICQ
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 9:12 am
Posts: 3139
Post 
BJ wrote:
baumer72 wrote:
BJ wrote:
4.4m away, so close.

135.6m is aweome get ready for 500m+


No way. It will struggle to 400. This will be so frontloaded, it has to drop from here.


it has to drop but some are expecting a freefall :nonono: 3.8+ multiplyer


That's absurd. With a 135 million dollar opening it would have to have a rediculous run to even break a 3.0 multiplier. I'm thinking more along the lines 2.75-2.8.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:57 pm
Profile WWW
Forum General
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm
Posts: 8642
Location: Toronto, Canada
Post 
so i think it broke all the weekend record, biggest sat or sunday! I think!

_________________
The Dark Prince

Image


Mon Jul 10, 2006 3:58 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Speevy wrote:
BJ wrote:
baumer72 wrote:
BJ wrote:
4.4m away, so close.

135.6m is aweome get ready for 500m+


No way. It will struggle to 400. This will be so frontloaded, it has to drop from here.


it has to drop but some are expecting a freefall :nonono: 3.8+ multiplyer


That's absurd. With a 135 million dollar opening it would have to have a rediculous run to even break a 3.0 multiplier. I'm thinking more along the lines 2.75-2.8.


Large openings do not limit legs. Passion, Spider-Man, Shrek 2, TPM etc.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:01 pm
Profile ICQ
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 5:25 pm
Posts: 1222
Post 
oops, the derby goes half a percent lower. :(


Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:03 pm
Profile
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
DP07 wrote:
They are just adjusting the legs to make it closer to their original predictions.


And you and BJ aren't? :tongue:

DP07 wrote:
Forget it.

Final: 177m/550m

OD: 65m

Well, I'm tempted to predict that. But, should I? Now, I'm thinking twice. Perhaps I should hedge with only 162m.


That's a 3.39x multiplier with the $162 million prediction. Using that same multiplier, it'd make $460 million total, which is minimum you expect now. Heh.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:04 pm
Profile
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Zingaling wrote:
DP07 wrote:
They are just adjusting the legs to make it closer to their original predictions.


And you and BJ aren't? :tongue:

DP07 wrote:
Forget it.

Final: 177m/550m

OD: 65m

Well, I'm tempted to predict that. But, should I? Now, I'm thinking twice. Perhaps I should hedge with only 162m.


That's a 3.39x multiplier with the $162 million prediction. Using that same multiplier, it'd make $460 million total, which is minimum you expect now. Heh.


Waiting for that.

We have a reason: the sellouts limited opening weekend. What's yours?


Last edited by DP07 on Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:05 pm
Profile ICQ
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 9:12 am
Posts: 3139
Post 
DP07 wrote:
Speevy wrote:
BJ wrote:
baumer72 wrote:
BJ wrote:
4.4m away, so close.

135.6m is aweome get ready for 500m+


No way. It will struggle to 400. This will be so frontloaded, it has to drop from here.


it has to drop but some are expecting a freefall :nonono: 3.8+ multiplyer


That's absurd. With a 135 million dollar opening it would have to have a rediculous run to even break a 3.0 multiplier. I'm thinking more along the lines 2.75-2.8.


Large openings do not limit legs. Passion, Spider-Man, Shrek 2, TPM etc.


Right, but none of those opened to something as rediculous as 135 million. A 3.0 multplier would put it at 405 million. As much as I hope this movie shatters all kinds of records, realistically I think it will not be able to pull of a 3.0. As much I want it to happen, in this day and age of extreme front-loadedness only one sequel opening up over 100 million, reached a 3.0 multiplier. But then again, Shrek 2 didn't get anywhere near 135 million.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:06 pm
Profile WWW
Commander and Chef

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 12:56 am
Posts: 30505
Location: Tonight ... YOU!
Post 
Speevy wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Speevy wrote:
BJ wrote:
baumer72 wrote:
BJ wrote:
4.4m away, so close.

135.6m is aweome get ready for 500m+


No way. It will struggle to 400. This will be so frontloaded, it has to drop from here.


it has to drop but some are expecting a freefall :nonono: 3.8+ multiplyer


That's absurd. With a 135 million dollar opening it would have to have a rediculous run to even break a 3.0 multiplier. I'm thinking more along the lines 2.75-2.8.


Large openings do not limit legs. Passion, Spider-Man, Shrek 2, TPM etc.


Right, but none of those opened to something as rediculous as 135 million. A 3.0 multplier would put it at 405 million. As much as I hope this movie shatters all kinds of records, realistically I think it will not be able to pull of a 3.0. As much I want it to happen, in this day and age of extreme front-loadedness only one sequel opening up over 100 million, reached a 3.0 multiplier. But then again, Shrek 2 didn't get anywhere near 135 million.


a few years ago, a 114 million opening was ridiculous as well.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:07 pm
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Speevy wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Speevy wrote:
BJ wrote:
baumer72 wrote:
BJ wrote:
4.4m away, so close.

135.6m is aweome get ready for 500m+


No way. It will struggle to 400. This will be so frontloaded, it has to drop from here.


it has to drop but some are expecting a freefall :nonono: 3.8+ multiplyer


That's absurd. With a 135 million dollar opening it would have to have a rediculous run to even break a 3.0 multiplier. I'm thinking more along the lines 2.75-2.8.


Large openings do not limit legs. Passion, Spider-Man, Shrek 2, TPM etc.


Right, but none of those opened to something as rediculous as 135 million. A 3.0 multplier would put it at 405 million. As much as I hope this movie shatters all kinds of records, realistically I think it will not be able to pull of a 3.0. As much I want it to happen, in this day and age of extreme front-loadedness only one sequel opening up over 100 million, reached a 3.0 multiplier. But then again, Shrek 2 didn't get anywhere near 135 million.


Large openings have never limited legs. They mean nothing in terms of legs. It's no more true then saying large objects fall faster. They don't.

Give me any evidence at all of it.


Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:08 pm
Profile ICQ
Yes we can call dibs on the mountain guide

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Houston
Post 
Ridiculousness is a subjective concept.

_________________
(hitokiri battousai)


Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:08 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post 
If one checks the BOM chart, among all the films that broke the opening-weekend record over the years, the most frontloaded one is The Lost World, and that only had its opening accounted for 31.5% of its total gross. I don't see a multiplier lower than 3.0.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:10 pm
Profile WWW
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post 
I don't have an excuse. I'm still predicing the same multiplier as I was prior to the weekend (3x). That'd give it $406 million, which is what I predicted in the "Top 10 Movies of 2006" thread.

:tongue:


Mon Jul 10, 2006 4:11 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 112 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Thegun and 158 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.