Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 12:25 pm



Reply to topic  [ 107 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 Can POTC 2 beat Titanic? 
Author Message
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:08 am
Posts: 1879
Post Re: Can POTC 2 beat Titanic?
Dreamline wrote:
Opening weekend? Maybe. :happy:

Anything can beat Titanics OW today.

PoTC2 would need about a 200 million dollar weekedn to have a shot at beating Titanic.

_________________
Cromulent!


Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:02 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm
Posts: 12197
Post 
Shrek 2 would now adjust to $468 m. Minor POTC spoiler

[spoil]There's just something about a cliffhanger that I don't see a Titanic gross from. #2 of all time a possiblility. But Titanic I think, you really need strong reviews as well to get those people OUTSIDE of those you'd get otherwise. [/spoil]


Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:18 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post 
Archie Gates wrote:
DP07 wrote:
This is too much fun today. :tongue:

If you really want to get people going, make a poll asking how much it will beat ROTK by.

:mad:

_________________
Image


Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:29 pm
Profile
Yes we can call dibs on the mountain guide

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Houston
Post 
Nazgul9 wrote:
Archie Gates wrote:
DP07 wrote:
This is too much fun today. :tongue:

If you really want to get people going, make a poll asking how much it will beat ROTK by.

:mad:

No way it'll touch ROTK's $800m overseas though. :p

_________________
(hitokiri battousai)


Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:30 pm
Profile
All Star Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
Post 
The only time my parents have gone to the theatres in Canada was to see Titanic and their English was not as good as it is now, and yet they still went. As of yet, my parents still don't want to see this movie. If they do, I shall join this club.


Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:42 pm
Profile WWW
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post 
Hitokiri Battousai wrote:
No way it'll touch ROTK's $800m overseas though. :p

:hahaha:

_________________
Image


Fri Jul 07, 2006 8:44 pm
Profile
Veteran
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2004 1:47 pm
Posts: 3917
Location: Las Vegas
Post 
Hitokiri Battousai wrote:

Sith never had a chance, considering how narrow of a fanbase it had. Most average people rolled their eyes at the movie. It also had very little rewatchability. Therefore, the comparison is moot.



This post is so ludicrous, the only reply it deserves is a :rofl:

_________________
Dr. RajKumar 4/24/1929 - 4/12/2006
The Greatest Actor Ever.
Thanks for The Best Cinematic Memories of My Life.


Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:13 am
Profile WWW
---------
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 10:42 pm
Posts: 11808
Location: Kansas City, Kansas
Post 
jb007 wrote:
Hitokiri Battousai wrote:

Sith never had a chance, considering how narrow of a fanbase it had. Most average people rolled their eyes at the movie. It also had very little rewatchability. Therefore, the comparison is moot.



This post is so ludicrous, the only reply it deserves is a :rofl:

I see you're a Star Wars fan.


Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:18 am
Profile
Hatchling

Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 3:04 am
Posts: 16
Location: Seattle
Post 
Of course it will...on opening weekend!!!!!!!!!!!!

_________________
2007...most anticipating!


Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:27 am
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22214
Location: Places
Post 
it gotits opeing weekend in like...5 hours LOL.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:35 am
Profile
Online
Devil's Advocate
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 40598
Post 
:tongue:

Titanic will never die.

Pirates 2 could get an 80 mil day, 200 mil weekend, and it still wouldn't come close. With that kind of opening numbers, for an anticipated sequel, it's multiplier would probably be about 2.5. Which is 500 mil... :)

_________________
Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227


Sat Jul 08, 2006 2:53 am
Profile
Some days I'm a super bitch
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:22 pm
Posts: 6645
Post 
If this watered-down Hollywood dreck beats Titanic, I will cry.






No one wants to see me cry. :mad:


Sat Jul 08, 2006 2:56 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post 
You guys are talking like Titanic was an amazing film.

Not the greatest film ever made... but good. Deserving of $600 mil? Meh... I guess.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Sat Jul 08, 2006 2:59 am
Profile
loyalfromlondon
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm
Posts: 19697
Location: ville-marie
Post 
I hope it doesn't beat Titanic either, and I don't think it will. Could cross $500 million, but that's it.

_________________
Magic Mike wrote:
zwackerm wrote:
If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes.


Same.


Algren wrote:
I don't think. I predict. ;)


Sat Jul 08, 2006 2:59 am
Profile
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post 
Shack wrote:
:tongue:

Titanic will never die.

Pirates 2 could get an 80 mil day, 200 mil weekend, and it still wouldn't come close. With that kind of opening numbers, for an anticipated sequel, it's multiplier would probably be about 2.5. Which is 500 mil... :)


Plan R


Sat Jul 08, 2006 3:05 am
Profile ICQ
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:08 am
Posts: 1879
Post 
ChipMunky wrote:
You guys are talking like Titanic was an amazing film.

Not the greatest film ever made... but good. Deserving of $600 mil? Meh... I guess.

Wii agree Chip Munky. Titanic was not the greatest film ever but it was a good film entertaining a bit long at times. Deserving of 600 well to the public it was but not really for me in hte sense of gross. I do feel it was a movie that was good enough it should of earned a net profit or in htis case 600 dollars becaus eof production costs :hahaha:

_________________
Cromulent!


Sat Jul 08, 2006 3:52 am
Profile WWW
Yes we can call dibs on the mountain guide

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Houston
Post 
MG Casey wrote:
jb007 wrote:
Hitokiri Battousai wrote:

Sith never had a chance, considering how narrow of a fanbase it had. Most average people rolled their eyes at the movie. It also had very little rewatchability. Therefore, the comparison is moot.



This post is so ludicrous, the only reply it deserves is a :rofl:

I see you're a Star Wars fan.

Ah good, you spared me from having to say that myself.

Star Wars fans are comically delusional when talking about their pet films. Among Sith's audience, men outnumbered women 3 to 2, if that reflects anything about demographics. A movie of its type has little rewatch value if one is not interested in the subject matter, therefore keeping away ordinary moviegoers that simply want repeated entertainment. To the average Joe, Star Wars (and most fantasy in general) is a positively dorky affair. To claim otherwise would be "ludicrous."

In other news, I still see the ceiling for DMC at $500m regardless of the buzz.

_________________
(hitokiri battousai)


Sat Jul 08, 2006 3:55 am
Profile
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:08 am
Posts: 1879
Post 
Hitokiri Battousai wrote:
MG Casey wrote:
jb007 wrote:
Hitokiri Battousai wrote:

Sith never had a chance, considering how narrow of a fanbase it had. Most average people rolled their eyes at the movie. It also had very little rewatchability. Therefore, the comparison is moot.



This post is so ludicrous, the only reply it deserves is a :rofl:

I see you're a Star Wars fan.

Ah good, you spared me from having to say that myself.

Star Wars fans are comically delusional when talking about their pet films. Among Sith's audience, men outnumbered women 3 to 2, if that reflects anything about demographics. A movie of its type has little rewatch value if one is not interested in the subject matter, therefore keeping away ordinary moviegoers that simply want repeated entertainment. To the average Joe, Star Wars (and most fantasy in general) is a positively dorky affair. To claim otherwise would be "ludicrous."

In other news, I still see the ceiling for DMC at $500m regardless of the buzz.


To be fair SW is one of the more mainstream SF/Fantasy movies out there that does have some bleed over with non SF fansand disdain from some hardcore SF fans. the only other movie series that can hold this claim is LoTR and HP. It is as mainstream as these genres can really get.

SW is also more of an american film like comic book movies...They do well overseas but only really like 55 OS/45 dom.

_________________
Cromulent!


Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:00 am
Profile WWW
Yes we can call dibs on the mountain guide

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Houston
Post 
Quote:
To be fair SW is one of the more mainstream SF/Fantasy movies out there that does have some bleed over with non SF fansand disdain from some hardcore SF fans. the only other movie series that can hold this claim is LoTR and HP. It is as mainstream as these genres can really get.

SW is also more of an american film like comic book movies...They do well overseas but only really like 55 OS/45 dom.

The original SW was a cultural phenomenon. The prequel trilogy is a geek convention. That was firmly established after TPM came and went. At least Sith was a quality film, or... English language cannot describe what I would say. But the damage was done already.

_________________
(hitokiri battousai)


Last edited by Anita Hussein Briem on Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:09 am, edited 3 times in total.



Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:03 am
Profile
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:08 am
Posts: 1879
Post 
Hitokiri Battousai wrote:
Quote:
To be fair SW is one of the more mainstream SF/Fantasy movies out there that does have some bleed over with non SF fansand disdain from some hardcore SF fans. the only other movie series that can hold this claim is LoTR and HP. It is as mainstream as these genres can really get.

SW is also more of an american film like comic book movies...They do well overseas but only really like 55 OS/45 dom.

The original SW was a cultural phenomenon. The prequel trilogy is a geek convention. That was firmly established after TPM came and went. At least Sith was a good film, or... English language cannot describe what I would say.

The new SW fall prey to bad writing stiff acting and the uncanny valley effects(hmm looks rigth but it is uhmm a little off).
I wouldn't say they are good movies, even Sith was just OK. they rode entirely off of the original.
the only thing that saved me form 100% disliking TPM was the lightsaber fight at the end and Darth Maul.

_________________
Cromulent!


Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:07 am
Profile WWW
Yes we can call dibs on the mountain guide

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Houston
Post 
Another problem is how George Lucas lost his vision with the first 2 1/2 movies. Just as an example, the battle scenes (end of TPM, end of AOTC, beginning of ROTS) were drier than bone dust, completely devoid of any momentum or emotion. What a pathetic retreat from the original Death Star battle. Watching these meant-to-be exciting scenes was like watching a stock ticker pass by.

_________________
(hitokiri battousai)


Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:11 am
Profile
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:08 am
Posts: 1879
Post 
Hitokiri Battousai wrote:
Another problem is how George Lucas lost his vision with the first 2 1/2 movies. The battle scenes (end of TPM, end of AOTC, beginning of ROTS) were drier than bone dust, completely devoid of any momentum or emotion. What a pathetic retreat from the original Death Star battle.

If you mean the space battles definitely. Actualy 95% of the PT was devoid of emotion well except for the parts where they scream "NOOOOOOO!!!!" by the time vader said it was very weak.

Then again my favorite wide release film of the past decade was FoTR. And Infernal Affairs is in my top ten so I have peculiar tastes.

_________________
Cromulent!


Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:14 am
Profile WWW
Yes we can call dibs on the mountain guide

Joined: Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 3290
Location: Houston
Post 
redspear wrote:
If you mean the space battles definitely. Actualy 95% of the PT was devoid of emotion well except for the parts where they scream "NOOOOOOO!!!!" by the time vader said it was very weak.

Then again my favorite wide release film of the past decade was FoTR. And Infernal Affairs is in my top ten so I have peculiar tastes.

Not peculiar at all for enjoying one of the most famous Chinese films ever. ;)

Now back to the topic: If several years ago someone said the best shot at toppling Titanic (which won't happen anyway) is a sequel to a film based on a Disneyland ride, I'd have bruised a lung laughing.

_________________
(hitokiri battousai)


Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:17 am
Profile
Indiana Jones IV

Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 12:08 am
Posts: 1879
Post 
Hitokiri Battousai wrote:
redspear wrote:
If you mean the space battles definitely. Actualy 95% of the PT was devoid of emotion well except for the parts where they scream "NOOOOOOO!!!!" by the time vader said it was very weak.

Then again my favorite wide release film of the past decade was FoTR. And Infernal Affairs is in my top ten so I have peculiar tastes.

Not peculiar at all for enjoying one of the most famous Chinese films ever. ;)

Now back to the topic: If several years ago someone said the best shot at toppling Titanic (which won't happen anyway) is a sequel to a film based on a Disneyland ride, I'd have bruised a lung laughing.

It is still a long ways from beating Titanic though. I don't think it will make it well if it gets 150 this weekend then I will seriously start to talk 500+ and titanic numbers. I expect legs to be over a 3x multiplier I always have.

_________________
Cromulent!


Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:23 am
Profile WWW
Veteran

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:07 pm
Posts: 3004
Post 
It's gotta do over $180m OW. I did some figures around ROTS opening to figure out what would topple Titanic. A sequel has never been #1. I think DVDs will take the sting out of it at the end if it gets close. I would look for a Shrek 2 over Shrek ratio, so $500m+ is very possible. Might be a lock for #2.

_________________
http://www.districtvibe.com/


Sat Jul 08, 2006 4:24 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 107 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 90 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.