| Author |
Message |
|
zingy
College Boy Z
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
|
 13 Going on 30 13 Going on 30 Quote: 13 Going on 30 (known as Suddenly 30 in Australia and Sugar and Spice in some markets) is a 2004 American romantic comedy fantasy film starring Jennifer Garner. It has a similar premise to the films Wish Upon a Star and Freaky Friday, in which girls' souls were swapped into different bodies, the classic short story, Rip Van Winkle, in which a young person falls asleep and wakes up many years later as an older person. Unlike the films Big, Vice Versa, and 14 Going on 30, in which boys are physically transformed into adult men while everyone else remains the same age, this film concerns a 13-year-old girl skipping 17 years of her life, and waking up as a successful magazine editor in the future. It was produced by Revolution Studios for Columbia Pictures. I really, really did not like this movie. A few laughs, but overall, mediocre. C
|
| Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:45 pm |
|
|
|
greasedlightning
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 2:36 pm
Posts: 1555
|
I wasn't a fan of it either... it was okay.. cute at times, a couple of laughs. Not a fan of Garner, so she didn't do much for me. I do like Mark Ruffalo, though, so he made the movie a little more enjoyable. It was a bit predictable, and I saw the ending coming from a mile away. Good for one viewing, but I wouldn't be able to watch it repeatedly.
|
| Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:54 pm |
|
|
|
Jeff
Christian's #1 Fan
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:25 pm
Posts: 28110
Location: Awaiting my fate
|
Guess I'm the odd one out? It was good, but nothing beyond a derivative chick-flick. It had the "been-there-done-that" feeling to it, but at the same time was still enjoyable. 6.5/10 (B)
|
| Fri Apr 01, 2005 11:57 pm |
|
|
|
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am
Posts: 18866
Location: San Diego
|
I liked it a lot, mainly due to Jennifer Garner's wonderful performance. - B+
|
| Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:31 am |
|
|
|
matatonio
Teh Mexican
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 11:56 pm
Posts: 26066
Location: In good ol' Mexico
|
a fun cute movie!
B
|
| Sat Apr 02, 2005 1:46 am |
|
|
|
Mister Ecks
New Server, Same X
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 7:07 pm
Posts: 28291
Location: ... siiiigh...
|
It was fine, up to the ending. They completely screwed it up. I actually forget how exactly, but it had to do with that pixy dust crap. It was like they went against what they tried to sell as their moral of the story. Only reason I'll buy it is to add to my Jennifer Garner collection.
Grade: B-/C+
_________________
Ecks Factor: Cancelled too soon
|
| Sat Apr 02, 2005 2:14 am |
|
|
|
Spidey
Teenage Dream
Joined: Mon Oct 18, 2004 8:13 pm
Posts: 10677
|
Grade: B
|
| Sat Apr 02, 2005 12:11 pm |
|
|
|
Neostorm
All Star Poster
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 2:48 pm
Posts: 4684
Location: Toronto
|
The Michael Jackson Dance thing made it all worth it 
|
| Sat Apr 02, 2005 12:11 pm |
|
|
|
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am
Posts: 23283
|
As cute as it was warm and funny; it took all the cliches of a chick flick and warmed them up with a glimmering leading lady. One of the better chickflicks as of late [A-/B+]
_________________
I'm out.
|
| Sat Apr 02, 2005 5:57 pm |
|
|
|
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
|
B
Jennifer Garner alone elevated it above mediocrity that is this movie. It is incredibly clichéd, cheesy and entirely predictable from minute one. Nonetheless, Garner's charming and smile-inducing acting makes up for that. The laughs are few and far in-between, but the movie still manages to remain likeable despite all the flaws and thanks to the great lead.
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
| Sun Sep 04, 2005 1:35 pm |
|
|
|
misutaa
je vois l'avenir
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 3:33 pm
Posts: 3841
Location: Hollywood/Berkeley, CA
|
It was good. nothing really special.
B
|
| Sun Sep 04, 2005 2:27 pm |
|
|
|
Shack
Devil's Advocate
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2005 2:30 am
Posts: 37963
|
B-/C+
I was expecting more. I remember when it came out I was expecting Mean Girls and 13 Going on 30 to be equal in enjoyment chick-flick style, wanted to see each equally. Mean Girls totally destroyed this movie.
_________________Shack’s top 50 tv shows - viewtopic.php?f=8&t=90227
|
| Sun Sep 04, 2005 4:22 pm |
|
|
|
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm
Posts: 48626
Location: Arlington, VA
|
This was on TV earlier.
Delightful. Jennifer Garner was wonderful. B+
|
| Thu Jun 29, 2006 12:01 am |
|
|
|
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
|
This one didn't work for me. It was like TVmovie-lite with a string of tired cliches. And how does that weasly Mark Ruffalo keep getting cast in movies?
1 out of 5.
|
| Thu Jun 29, 2006 5:27 am |
|
|
|
Levy
Golfaholic
Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 2:06 pm
Posts: 16054
|
We've seen a movie like that a lot, but Jennifer Garner is sooo lovely, that the film manages to be a charmer after all. B-
|
| Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:32 am |
|
|
