Author |
Message |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Zimmerman made the first error. That is where it ends. Zimmerman starts it. Zimmerman ends it. And there is no punishment. Martin got his punishment.
Also, who cares if he rated low in his classes. HE TOOK THEM. He was aware of how to fight, why didn't he?
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 12:46 pm |
|
 |
Rev
Romosexual!
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 3:06 am Posts: 32632 Location: the last free city
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
nghtvsn wrote: Well since you didn't follow the trial, you wouldn't know that the instructor rated him extremely low as to even being a fighter. A hard worker yes, but nowhere near a fighter of Any caliber.
Yes, he took it a step further and got out his car to follow him. Then he Stopped. He was going back to his car. Everything...Everything ENDS there as long as Trayvon doesn't go and confront him, punch him and beat him on the ground. No fight=no death. You can say no follow=no death too, but they both made errors that night. Can we agree? Was that from zimmerman word or from the evidence? I didn't follow the case much.
_________________ Is it 2028 yet?
Last edited by Rev on Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:12 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
America!
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:13 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Zimmerman obviously had just watched Minority Report before going out and patrolling.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:14 pm |
|
 |
ironmanbarry
Star Trek XI
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 8:05 pm Posts: 357
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Chippy wrote: Zimmerman made the first error. That is where it ends. Zimmerman starts it. Zimmerman ends it. And there is no punishment. Martin got his punishment.
Zimmerman got attacked and beaten by Martin, which is more punishment than Zimmerman deserves as Zimmerman did nothing legally wrong.
_________________The Truth is, I am Iron-Man! http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... bITU#t=58sIronMan1: RT Score 93%, Average Rating: 7.6/10, Reviews Counted: 238, Fresh: 222 | Rotten: 16 IronMan2: RT Score 73%, Average Rating: 6.5/10, Reviews Counted: 274, Fresh: 201 | Rotten: 73 IronMan3: RT Score 78%, Average Rating: 6.9/10, Reviews Counted: 260, Fresh: 203 | Rotten: 57 IronMan4/5/6/7/8/9: TBD
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:16 pm |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Its not this thread most people I have encountered my friends more then 3/4 think Zimmerman did not murder Martin and they are all 20-25 old people. No you are fully wrong about Zimmerman following Martin meaning Zimmerman becomes responsibile for anything that comes out as a result. Its the same arguement that imagine Zimmerman was a drunk driver and Martin was a man who ran a red and hit Zimmerman. Is Zimmerman being drunk meaning he is responsibile for everything. In the end they both made a huge huge mistake. Also People think Martin was some small looking kid... No he was over 6 feet a kid who was suspended and a history of getting into fights. So it is easily possibile to suggest he wanted a fight because he likes to fight. Did he deserve to die for that no, is it muder no. That is this case. Quote: Also, who cares if he rated low in his classes. HE TOOK THEM. He was aware of how to fight, why didn't he?
Martin had way more experience in fighting (street fighting) then Zimmerman easily. Quote: Essentially that's saying if I walk down the street and see what I think is a shady character and I think he's holding a gun in his pocket and is going to shoot me, I have the right to take outa gun and shoot him first before he even reveals himself. And even if he didn't actually have any weapon, I'm still justified because I had a fear that he did and that fear makes my action justifiable.
No because your not getting your head smashed into the sidewalk. You guys ignore there was a fight over and over... It seems Zimmerman opponents think Zimmerman followed Martin and just went "your black, die now!" There was a fight witness puts Martin on top and forensic experts agree.
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:19 pm |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
NOO ^
You just murdered someone out of an irrational fear.
If you get into a fight and he grabs your gun or is pretty much bashing your head against the sidewalk that is a different story.
Legal matter and court cases cannot be all easily explained by general assumptions or broad examples.
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:24 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Stop saying that Martin was "bashing his head into the sidewalk". None of his injuries were serious, at all.
Also, your car scenario is stupid. Not even the same at all. It would be like... Driver A is driving drunk closely behind Driver B. Driver B brakes hard to get Driver A to stop tailgating, Driver A hits Driver B. Driver B dies.
Guess who is at fault!? Driver A.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:26 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
So because Martin has been in school fights before, that means he has more fighting experience? Which automatically means he's better than Zimmerman? Give me a break.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:27 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
True story.
Middle school. I was on the field with some friends, and a bully came up to me. He shoved me and I fell back into a tree. It hurt. I was "losing" that fight, so using this case as an example, I could've shot and killed that bully with no repercussions.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:29 pm |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Quote: And Zimmerman followed Travyon out of the irrational fear and then murdered him out of irrational fear.
It may have seemed rational to him, just like it seemes rational to me that the dude in the ally is trying to kill me. But it's still irrational.
But Zimmerman did not murder Martin because Zimmerman fought back in self defense. If this was such a clear cut murder case why did the defense rip the Govt to shreds in the case... because... It was a manslaughter case. Chippy wrote: Stop saying that Martin was "bashing his head into the sidewalk". None of his injuries were serious, at all.
Also, your car scenario is stupid. Not even the same at all. It would be like... Driver A is driving drunk closely behind Driver B. Driver B brakes hard to get Driver A to stop tailgating, Driver A hits Driver B. Driver B dies.
Guess who is at fault!? Driver A. Broken nose gashes to the back of the head, if the fight went on more who knows what could have happened. A lot of silly assumptions we are making. Also your car example is wrong because Driver B still caused the actual event to start. Slaming the brakes made no sense and getting into a fight was Martins decision.
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:32 pm |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Chippy wrote: So because Martin has been in school fights before, that means he has more fighting experience? Which automatically means he's better than Zimmerman? Give me a break. Um I think you have to remember that Zimmerman was a wannabe cop and did some MMA training but he sucked while Martin was involved in street fights which was exactly what happened. So really? Who has way more experience at a street fight?
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:34 pm |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
look I agree morally what Zimmerman did was wrong..
However in a court case the only thing tying Zimmerman to murder where silly assumptions.
I thought you guys think Legally Zimmerman should have gone for murder, if this is a moral issue.
Then its different...
Even so I think it more of Zimmerman and Martin making really stupid decisions that night.
_________________The Dark Prince 
Last edited by Mannyisthebest on Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:37 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
You're making Zimmerman out to be this fat little guy who was essentially a child.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:37 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Mannyisthebest wrote: Chippy wrote: Stop saying that Martin was "bashing his head into the sidewalk". None of his injuries were serious, at all.
Also, your car scenario is stupid. Not even the same at all. It would be like... Driver A is driving drunk closely behind Driver B. Driver B brakes hard to get Driver A to stop tailgating, Driver A hits Driver B. Driver B dies.
Guess who is at fault!? Driver A. Broken nose gashes to the back of the head, if the fight went on more who knows what could have happened. A lot of silly assumptions we are making. Also your car example is wrong because Driver B still caused the actual event to start. Slaming the brakes made no sense and getting into a fight was Martins decision. Driver A is at fault. That's a fact.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:38 pm |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
People make Martin seem as a 14 year black kid...
Also about the car example.
Morally Driver A is wrong, if he was not drunk none of this would have happened.
Legally Driver B by slaming the brakes escalated the situation and again if Driver B did not do that none of this would have happened. In such a case Driver A would be charged for drunk driving but not killing Driver B.
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:39 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
People know Martin was tall and fit and fully capable of fighting. But so was Zimmerman. He took fighting classes.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:45 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Mannyisthebest wrote: People make Martin seem as a 14 year black kid...
Also about the car example.
Morally Driver A is wrong, if he was not drunk none of this would have happened.
Legally Driver B by slaming the brakes escalated the situation and again if Driver B did not do that none of this would have happened. In such a case Driver A would be charged for drunk driving but not killing Driver B. You are incorrect. Driver A would be charged and convicted of manslaughter. That's not my opinion. That's a fact.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:46 pm |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Anyways another interesting angel appearing is the Jury did not care for the star Witness testimony as they did not take her seriously. People say race played a huge factor. It seems no matter what she said, the way she said it and her attitude made her not credible to the Jury and then add in her contradicting herself and really she simply just heard the events over a phone and was not an actual witness. I don’t think it was race but more of a class issue. If she spoke well I think the jury would take her seriously. Example is the Jury really paid attention to Martin’s Brother. Quote: You are incorrect. Driver A would be charged and convicted of manslaughter. That's not my opinion. That's a fact.
It would be manslaughter at most but nothing else exactly as this case should have gone down but Black leaders cheered on by the media wanted Zimmerman's head and got burned. Also the media acted wrong here as well... They first distored the truth and made it seem Zimmerman killed Martin in cold blood. Then the case was launched and then the photo's came out and then I knew and many experts knew charging him with 2nd degree murder was a huge mistake.
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:46 pm |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
If you looked at the case the defense pretty much ripped most of the govt witnesses to shreds. Some of the witnesses like John Good actually was twisted around and helped the defense immensely.
The reason was that it was a murder case giving the defense a far easier time to attack.
This was simply a huge clusterF*CK.
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:53 pm |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Zimmerman committed manslaughter and got away with it.
Floriduh.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 1:55 pm |
|
 |
nghtvsn
Extraordinary
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 7:13 pm Posts: 11016 Location: Warren Theatre Oklahoma
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
I actually thought Rachel Jeantel's testimony was quite riveting even with the mumbled speaking, but on cross examination she came across a bit sour. I still think her testimony was truthful but it just confirmed George's account. Except for the opinion on who was screaming.
_________________ 2009 World of KJ Fantasy Football World Champion Team MVP : Peyton Manning : Record 11-5 : Points 2669.00 [b]FREE KORRGAN 45TH PRESIDENT OF THE U.S.A. DONALD J. TRUMP #MAGA #KAG! 10,000 post achieved on - Posted: Wed May 16, 2018 7:49 pm
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:19 pm |
|
 |
ironmanbarry
Star Trek XI
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 8:05 pm Posts: 357
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Chippy wrote: Zimmerman committed manslaughter and got away with it.
Floriduh. OK, Go with the Mob Mentality. Round up the posse and lets hang him. Justice be Damned.
_________________The Truth is, I am Iron-Man! http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... bITU#t=58sIronMan1: RT Score 93%, Average Rating: 7.6/10, Reviews Counted: 238, Fresh: 222 | Rotten: 16 IronMan2: RT Score 73%, Average Rating: 6.5/10, Reviews Counted: 274, Fresh: 201 | Rotten: 73 IronMan3: RT Score 78%, Average Rating: 6.9/10, Reviews Counted: 260, Fresh: 203 | Rotten: 57 IronMan4/5/6/7/8/9: TBD
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:24 pm |
|
 |
mdana
Veteran
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:07 pm Posts: 3004
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
Magnus wrote: Mannyisthebest wrote: You just murdered someone out of an irrational fear.
And Zimmerman followed Travyon out of the irrational fear and then murdered him out of irrational fear.It may have seemed rational to him, just like it seemes rational to me that the dude in the ally is trying to kill me. But it's still irrational. Your characterization is devoid of any factual basis, unless we are unaware of your mind reading ability. He originally followed TM, because TM was acting suspicious. According to GZ, "This guy (TM) looks like he's up to no good, or he's on drugs or something. It's raining and he's just walking around, looking about." It was apparently odd to be walking in the neighborhood under the conditions of that night. From the CNN article page 1. "I thought it was rather loud, but I had just shut my window because it had just started pouring out rain," the witness said. "And then I thought, 'Oh, my gosh, who's out there walking their dog in the rain?' http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/29/justice/f ... PM:JUSTICEThis witness turned out to be Jayne Surdyka who testified for the state. In addition, TM took over 40 minutes to walk less than a mile from the 7-11 to the area near where he was staying, which is abnormally slow (hence suspicious). Lastly, a work crew had chased down a criminal in the previous month. I can't find the link, if I do I will post it. I found this an interesting perspective compared to the ridiculous assertions being shouted on cable news: Quote: I do not believe the elephant in the room was race, as asserted by these lawyers. If anything, in my view, it was neighborhood watch groups that encourage citizens to spy and report on their neighbors. From the Government's Operation Tips to "If you see it, report it," the Government and law enforcement encourage the reporting of immensely subjective personal perceptions and suspicions. This country expends an extraordinary amount of resources on law enforcement. They have unlimited surveillance tools at their disposal, from cameras that record us at public events to obtaining the location data on our cell phones. They don't need to involve untrained citizens.The multiple unfortunate events in this case did not begin with George Zimmerman getting out his car. They began with the creation of a Neighborhood Watch which sent out newsletters like this one. http://www.talkleft.com/story/2013/7/15 ... an-Verdict
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:58 pm |
|
 |
Mannyisthebest
Forum General
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 3:53 pm Posts: 8642 Location: Toronto, Canada
|
 Re: Zimmerman Trial
I hope things simmer down because if Zimmerman gets killed, ( I know what I will say sounds a bit bad considering Martin death was tragic), would actually cause race relations to sour...
Also reports were wrong about it being 3 vs 3 in the Jury.
It was never close.
It was 3 vs 2 Vs 1, for Not Guilty, Manslaughter and Murder.
The one lady who thought murder quickly changed to manslaughter and then wanted till the end for Zimmerman to be charged for something and why it took so long.
_________________The Dark Prince 
|
Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:59 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 82 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|