Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 11:29 am



Reply to topic  [ 121 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
 Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made? 
Author Message
College Boy Z

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:40 pm
Posts: 36662
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Thegun wrote:
zingy wrote:
Thegun wrote:
Even so, anyone going to the movies this weekend, TDK was the number one choice.

The point is that family films, comedies, and art films would be hit even more. TDKR was still an event. Is it really hard to realize that people don't want to see films out for a few weeks that target children, the oddest of people, and people necessarily wont go to the movies to laugh. It seems really obvious to me.


This seems so backwards to me. So the people who are afraid to go to the movies because of the shooting would opt to see a movie about a guy taking over the city and killing innocent people? Or would they see a light-hearted film? And also, would they prefer to see the movie where the shootings took place? Or another? AND logically, if another copycat shooting were to occur, would it be in The Dark Knight Rises or freakin' Ice Age 4? Be real.


Or wouldn't it be even easier, more tragic, and unexpected that a copycat went into Ice Age 4 and killed 20 families.

I can't go inside the mind of a psycho, just like no one else can go on here. Everything about this is backwards. But I know If I was going to risk my life to go to a movie, it be the #1 most anticipated film of the year, not fucking TED (And I thought Ted was amazing) It's one thing to go to a movie with your friends, but if you're taking you're kids to the movies or parents to see an arthouse film, you're responsible for everyone. I'd be much more hesitant.


...lol, I'm not pretending to know what a psycho would do, but I still find your argument absurd. If someone truly feels that they're risking their life seeing a movie, they're not going to see either one. I don't know if you, personally, want to die in TDKR over Ted, but I'd prefer neither. If I'm worried about it, I'll stay away. And I'm sure anyone who even remotely thinks this way will pick neither. That's why it makes NO sense that comedies are hurt the most.

And yes, it would be more tragic if it happened in Ice Age 4 considering that it'll be majority kids, but considering that it did happen in TDKR and that is the biggest movie in the country (hence more likely to have packed houses over Ice Age 4, which will be making about 1/7 of TDKR this weekend) aaaand the few reports of copycat attempts have all been associated with TDKR, don't you think TDKR is the one that's most affected and at risk?

Again, I'm just not seeing your point. At all. And for the record, I do think kids movies take a big hit here. Families are going to be the most cautious, that's for sure. But movies like Ted? The Watch? No. They'll be affected, yes, but that's just because EVERY movie is going to be affected. But if you're really going to break down which movies are going to be more affected, you cannot honestly believe that TDKR won't be because you believe people would rather die watching the #1 most anticipated movie of 2012.


Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:21 pm
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
I want to die watching Step Up Revolution.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:24 pm
Profile
Arrrrrrrrrrgggghhhhhhhhhh!
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:17 pm
Posts: 21572
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
David wrote:
I want to die watching Step Up Revolution.

Why not choose a Sandler or Kevin James movie to die in?


Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:35 pm
Profile
Full Fledged Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 5:03 pm
Posts: 60
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Jack Sparrow wrote:
If you know a little about BO then massive midnight numbers leading to $30m midnights does not translate to $100m OD and I would say the max we were looking was $90m OD with that. $57m Saturday and $52m Sunday with TDK drops (which was the best case scenario after burning too much of initial demand). This equates to $199m but for argument sake let's put it at $200m so how is that LOCKED to beat Avengers and pass $700m with that number? LOCK is something that is a certainty even if we had made $35m midnights I would have agreed upon this being VERY LIKELY still not a lock.



Hey, fuckface, my prediction is that it would have beaten The Avengers and had a shot at Titanic. Look at you, trying to make me out to look like the guy who is flipping out over nothing but I write one small little sentence about a BO prediction, and then you piss yourself, write a paragraph quoting things I never said... Who's really flipping out? :lol:

And btw, with those midnights I was thinking 93/61/56, which is a 210 OW and btw, beats TA by 30M with TDK's legs.

_________________
If all but life was but a dream, fantastic posing greed then we should feed our jewelry to the sea. For diamonds do appear to be: just like broken glass to me.


Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:42 pm
Profile
Online
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21898
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
zingy wrote:
Thegun wrote:
zingy wrote:
Thegun wrote:
Even so, anyone going to the movies this weekend, TDK was the number one choice.

The point is that family films, comedies, and art films would be hit even more. TDKR was still an event. Is it really hard to realize that people don't want to see films out for a few weeks that target children, the oddest of people, and people necessarily wont go to the movies to laugh. It seems really obvious to me.


This seems so backwards to me. So the people who are afraid to go to the movies because of the shooting would opt to see a movie about a guy taking over the city and killing innocent people? Or would they see a light-hearted film? And also, would they prefer to see the movie where the shootings took place? Or another? AND logically, if another copycat shooting were to occur, would it be in The Dark Knight Rises or freakin' Ice Age 4? Be real.


Or wouldn't it be even easier, more tragic, and unexpected that a copycat went into Ice Age 4 and killed 20 families.

I can't go inside the mind of a psycho, just like no one else can go on here. Everything about this is backwards. But I know If I was going to risk my life to go to a movie, it be the #1 most anticipated film of the year, not fucking TED (And I thought Ted was amazing) It's one thing to go to a movie with your friends, but if you're taking you're kids to the movies or parents to see an arthouse film, you're responsible for everyone. I'd be much more hesitant.


...lol, I'm not pretending to know what a psycho would do, but I still find your argument absurd. If someone truly feels that they're risking their life seeing a movie, they're not going to see either one. I don't know if you, personally, want to die in TDKR over Ted, but I'd prefer neither. If I'm worried about it, I'll stay away. And I'm sure anyone who even remotely thinks this way will pick neither. That's why it makes NO sense that comedies are hurt the most.

And yes, it would be more tragic if it happened in Ice Age 4 considering that it'll be majority kids, but considering that it did happen in TDKR and that is the biggest movie in the country (hence more likely to have packed houses over Ice Age 4, which will be making about 1/7 of TDKR this weekend) aaaand the few reports of copycat attempts have all been associated with TDKR, don't you think TDKR is the one that's most affected and at risk?

Again, I'm just not seeing your point. At all. And for the record, I do think kids movies take a big hit here. Families are going to be the most cautious, that's for sure. But movies like Ted? The Watch? No. They'll be affected, yes, but that's just because EVERY movie is going to be affected. But if you're really going to break down which movies are going to be more affected, you cannot honestly believe that TDKR won't be because you believe people would rather die watching the #1 most anticipated movie of 2012.


I don't want to die either, and I don't think I was risking my life, as I'm sure most people thought this weekend. People had it in the back of their mind, but it still was a freak occurrence. As I said earlier, the people most affected would be in Colorado.

Also I said that TDKR was the most impacted film this weekend. I said it made up about half, but the only reason is because 7% is still over 10 million. My point is the film still had many more pros to seeing the film then any other film in the top 10, despite it being where the shooting took place. When tragedies hit, people often go to the movies. When a mass shooting in a theater happens, people go to a water park. There the only danger is someone takes a piss in the water next to you. Ted and the other films suffer even greater because escaping from a theater massacre INTO A THEATER is just about the dumbest thing I've ever heard. That's why other films were impacted more than TDKR % wise and not exactly money wise.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:54 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 1796
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Psilocybin wrote:
Jack Sparrow wrote:
If you know a little about BO then massive midnight numbers leading to $30m midnights does not translate to $100m OD and I would say the max we were looking was $90m OD with that. $57m Saturday and $52m Sunday with TDK drops (which was the best case scenario after burning too much of initial demand). This equates to $199m but for argument sake let's put it at $200m so how is that LOCKED to beat Avengers and pass $700m with that number? LOCK is something that is a certainty even if we had made $35m midnights I would have agreed upon this being VERY LIKELY still not a lock.



Hey, fuckface, my prediction is that it would have beaten The Avengers and had a shot at Titanic. Look at you, trying to make me out to look like the guy who is flipping out over nothing but I write one small little sentence about a BO prediction, and then you piss yourself, write a paragraph quoting things I never said... Who's really flipping out? :lol:

And btw, with those midnights I was thinking 93/61/56, which is a 210 OW and btw, beats TA by 30M with TDK's legs.


lol, this guy is absolutely hilarious. :funny:

_________________
Best of 2014:
1- Apes 9.5/10
2- Noah 9.0/10
3- Lone Survivor 8.5/10
4- Captain America 8.0/10
5- 300: 8.0/10


Tue Jul 24, 2012 1:04 pm
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22214
Location: Places
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
posted elsehwere:

Also for the doubters, do you guys know how down to a science they have the estimates?

By 11 AM west coast time, based on pre-sales, real in depth tracking, midnight showings, early east coast returns, and theater habits, studios can estimate where the films Friday is heading with startling accuracy. How do you think we get such accurate Sunday estimates...on Sunday morning?

Point blank, I feel like there needs to be no further evidence. When the
-HOLLYWOOD REPORTER is saying early on that it is heading for 85-90 million Friday
-Normally low baller Gitesh Pandya says "Super early to know for sure, but source tells me #TDKR now heading for possible high 80s FRI incl midnights"
-When Nikki reports Friday afternoon that it is on pce for "high 80s at least"

These people know their stuff. Nikki is an bitch, but the studio execs have this down to a science. When these are the real time box office estimates based on REAL results...and then the real number turns out to be 75 million? There is only one explanation.

Everybody saying this movie only missed out on 5-10 million, or that the Friday gross would not have topped 80-85 million without the shooting...is basically saying they know more about the box office than the people mentioned above.

Which, for obvious reasons, it complete laughable, nonsensical bullshit.

It is the strongest guess that can be made. Without the shooting, we are looking at least 85 million on Friday, and 180 million for the weekend; i would say those are conservative numbers.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:02 pm
Profile
Online
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21898
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
The problem is they are less accurate when it comes Midnights to the rest of the day. Midnights have always been unpredictable. There is no set science for them. I think it could have hit 78-82 on the midnight number, but 180 is just too close to the admissions record to be considered all that truthful. I think 175 seemed more like it when it came down to it. Once the 75 million number or any number comes out on Friday, everyone has a good idea where it will head, not just the studio.

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Last edited by Thegun on Wed Jul 25, 2012 9:30 am, edited 2 times in total.



Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:50 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 1796
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Excel wrote:
posted elsehwere:

Also for the doubters, do you guys know how down to a science they have the estimates?

By 11 AM west coast time, based on pre-sales, real in depth tracking, midnight showings, early east coast returns, and theater habits, studios can estimate where the films Friday is heading with startling accuracy. How do you think we get such accurate Sunday estimates...on Sunday morning?

Point blank, I feel like there needs to be no further evidence. When the
-HOLLYWOOD REPORTER is saying early on that it is heading for 85-90 million Friday
-Normally low baller Gitesh Pandya says "Super early to know for sure, but source tells me #TDKR now heading for possible high 80s FRI incl midnights"
-When Nikki reports Friday afternoon that it is on pce for "high 80s at least"

These people know their stuff. Nikki is an bitch, but the studio execs have this down to a science. When these are the real time box office estimates based on REAL results...and then the real number turns out to be 75 million? There is only one explanation.

Everybody saying this movie only missed out on 5-10 million, or that the Friday gross would not have topped 80-85 million without the shooting...is basically saying they know more about the box office than the people mentioned above.

Which, for obvious reasons, it complete laughable, nonsensical bullshit.

It is the strongest guess that can be made. Without the shooting, we are looking at least 85 million on Friday, and 180 million for the weekend; i would say those are conservative numbers.


So my 89 OD/195 OW prediction was pretty good. :shades:

_________________
Best of 2014:
1- Apes 9.5/10
2- Noah 9.0/10
3- Lone Survivor 8.5/10
4- Captain America 8.0/10
5- 300: 8.0/10


Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:22 pm
Profile WWW
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 23386
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
zingy wrote:
Thegun wrote:
zingy wrote:
Thegun wrote:
Even so, anyone going to the movies this weekend, TDK was the number one choice.

The point is that family films, comedies, and art films would be hit even more. TDKR was still an event. Is it really hard to realize that people don't want to see films out for a few weeks that target children, the oddest of people, and people necessarily wont go to the movies to laugh. It seems really obvious to me.


This seems so backwards to me. So the people who are afraid to go to the movies because of the shooting would opt to see a movie about a guy taking over the city and killing innocent people? Or would they see a light-hearted film? And also, would they prefer to see the movie where the shootings took place? Or another? AND logically, if another copycat shooting were to occur, would it be in The Dark Knight Rises or freakin' Ice Age 4? Be real.


Or wouldn't it be even easier, more tragic, and unexpected that a copycat went into Ice Age 4 and killed 20 families.

I can't go inside the mind of a psycho, just like no one else can go on here. Everything about this is backwards. But I know If I was going to risk my life to go to a movie, it be the #1 most anticipated film of the year, not fucking TED (And I thought Ted was amazing) It's one thing to go to a movie with your friends, but if you're taking you're kids to the movies or parents to see an arthouse film, you're responsible for everyone. I'd be much more hesitant.


...lol, I'm not pretending to know what a psycho would do, but I still find your argument absurd. If someone truly feels that they're risking their life seeing a movie, they're not going to see either one. I don't know if you, personally, want to die in TDKR over Ted, but I'd prefer neither. If I'm worried about it, I'll stay away. And I'm sure anyone who even remotely thinks this way will pick neither. That's why it makes NO sense that comedies are hurt the most.

And yes, it would be more tragic if it happened in Ice Age 4 considering that it'll be majority kids, but considering that it did happen in TDKR and that is the biggest movie in the country (hence more likely to have packed houses over Ice Age 4, which will be making about 1/7 of TDKR this weekend) aaaand the few reports of copycat attempts have all been associated with TDKR, don't you think TDKR is the one that's most affected and at risk?

Again, I'm just not seeing your point. At all. And for the record, I do think kids movies take a big hit here. Families are going to be the most cautious, that's for sure. But movies like Ted? The Watch? No. They'll be affected, yes, but that's just because EVERY movie is going to be affected. But if you're really going to break down which movies are going to be more affected, you cannot honestly believe that TDKR won't be because you believe people would rather die watching the #1 most anticipated movie of 2012.


Thats right, TDKR will be most effected. So too will family/kids films in the short term.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:50 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36949
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Psilocybin wrote:
Jack Sparrow wrote:
If you know a little about BO then massive midnight numbers leading to $30m midnights does not translate to $100m OD and I would say the max we were looking was $90m OD with that. $57m Saturday and $52m Sunday with TDK drops (which was the best case scenario after burning too much of initial demand). This equates to $199m but for argument sake let's put it at $200m so how is that LOCKED to beat Avengers and pass $700m with that number? LOCK is something that is a certainty even if we had made $35m midnights I would have agreed upon this being VERY LIKELY still not a lock.



Hey, fuckface, my prediction is that it would have beaten The Avengers and had a shot at Titanic. Look at you, trying to make me out to look like the guy who is flipping out over nothing but I write one small little sentence about a BO prediction, and then you piss yourself, write a paragraph quoting things I never said... Who's really flipping out? :lol:

And btw, with those midnights I was thinking 93/61/56, which is a 210 OW and btw, beats TA by 30M with TDK's legs.


The Internet psycho/terrorist has stopped posting. Did someone ban him?


Wed Jul 25, 2012 2:18 am
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:07 pm
Posts: 3004
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Quote:
While two new movies will open Friday, all eyes will be on the second weekend performance of "The Dark Knight Rises," which will be dampened in part by moviegoer reluctance to go to the multiplex after last week's massacre in a Colorado theater.

The final installment in director Christopher Nolan's Batman trilogy, however, will again dominate the box office, though box-office experts believe some moviegoers will steer clear of theaters after last Friday's mass shootings at a post-midnight screening of "Dark Knight Rises" in Aurora, Colo.

A poll taken by a major Hollywood market research firm showed that on Monday, 25% of moviegoers were reluctant to head to theaters but that number had declined to 20% by Thursday.

That is likely to affect the grosses of "Dark Knight" and all other current releases.

After opening with a massive $160.9 million last weekend in the wake of the tragedy, "The Dark Knight Rises" is expected to take in an additional $65 million to $70 million this round, according to those who have seen pre-release audience surveys.


http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/en ... 7006.story

That number could have been higher the previous days covering the weekend. If 25% of moviegoers opted out last weekend the box office lost appoximately $75m, since 75% of $298.7m is $224m. The 25% could have disproportionately affected TDKR. If it was proportionate, TDKR potentially lost $53.8m over the weekend.

I have no idea what this weekend is supposed to be, but if it was supposed to be $150m, then it comes in around $120m-125m as the reluctant numbers drop. I think much of the loss from reluctant moviegoers comes out of TDKR and $50m is questionable at the moment.

_________________
http://www.districtvibe.com/


Thu Jul 26, 2012 8:09 pm
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22214
Location: Places
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Horrible.

Serious question, where does WB go from here? There is clearly a large audience of people who are interested in seeing the film & pre shooting were planning on seeing the film who have NOT seen it yet, and may not ever see in theaters. How does W.B. go about trying to reacquire that business? For example, does anybody think we see the biggest theater expansion ever sometime in September/October? Or a large scale rerelase next spring?

TBH, they would have to come up with an entire new marketing campaign to remind people WHY they wanted to see it. Trailers spending the first minute-90 seconds going over BB & TDK and then showing off the ending of the trilogy or something. It is just crazy.

There is literally going to be 100s of millions of dollars in untapped business by the time the current run ends, they have to make some effort to reacquire it.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:20 pm
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Where do they go from here? They release it on DVD/Blu-ray, and people catch it up with it at Redbox.

EPIC. EPIC. THE FIRE RISES.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Last edited by David on Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:21 pm
Profile
Powered By Hate
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 8:55 pm
Posts: 7578
Location: Torrington, CT
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Current run? Hmm. Well, apparently the anxiety tapered off by a fifth in the last week. Maybe in a month they can give it a boost when that anxiety is gone?

_________________
It's my lucky crack pipe.


Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:21 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am
Posts: 2483
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Excel wrote:
Horrible.

Serious question, where does WB go from here? There is clearly a large audience of people who are interested in seeing the film & pre shooting were planning on seeing the film who have NOT seen it yet, and may not ever see in theaters. How does W.B. go about trying to reacquire that business? For example, does anybody think we see the biggest theater expansion ever sometime in September/October? Or a large scale rerelase next spring?

TBH, they would have to come up with an entire new marketing campaign to remind people WHY they wanted to see it. Trailers spending the first minute-90 seconds going over BB & TDK and then showing off the ending of the trilogy or something. It is just crazy.

There is literally going to be 100s of millions of dollars in untapped business by the time the current run ends, they have to make some effort to reacquire it.


Bleh, horse is already out of the stable. Good thing for them it is kicking ass overseas. Maybe this will end up being huge in home video rentals from all the people who decided to skip it after the shooting.


Thu Jul 26, 2012 10:25 pm
Profile WWW
Superfreak
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 22214
Location: Places
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Idk, it is worth the investment. If WB can make a big enough deal of it, expansions in the fall and a rerelease next spring could make up for some of it, perhaps 50 million+.

Its certainly conceivable to me that expanding back into 3,000+ theaters and rebooting the marketing for a mid september expansion could notch another weekend with 20 million+.

_________________
Ari Emmanuel wrote:
I'd rather marry lindsay Lohan than represent Mel Gibson.


Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:00 pm
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Oh, please.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:02 pm
Profile
College Boy T

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 7:52 pm
Posts: 16020
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
I really doubt a rerelease would happen. It'd present significant communication issues.


Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:04 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 1796
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Seeing how frontloaded TDKR is being, I'm quite sure it wouldn't have beaten Avengers. And I'm not sure it would have beaten TDK either. Around $500M seems about right. Because of the shooting, it will be about $75M less than that.

_________________
Best of 2014:
1- Apes 9.5/10
2- Noah 9.0/10
3- Lone Survivor 8.5/10
4- Captain America 8.0/10
5- 300: 8.0/10


Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:09 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36949
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Excel stop trying to be funny. There is no way this is going to re-release in the current set of circumstances. How do they know if they put that much effort people will come back to see this movie in theaters? There are times that people won't change their minds about stuffs and this suits right into that category.


Thu Jul 26, 2012 11:32 pm
Profile
Veteran

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:07 pm
Posts: 3004
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
choubachou wrote:
Seeing how frontloaded TDKR is being, I'm quite sure it wouldn't have beaten Avengers. And I'm not sure it would have beaten TDK either. Around $500M seems about right. Because of the shooting, it will be about $75M less than that.


Some of that frontloaded appearance is due to other factors. I think if people are returning to the theaters they are seeing another film and not TDKR. If 20% of the audience has returned since Monday, TDKR got a very small percentage of that returning audience. It is having to do these numbers missing parts of its audience. I think the female audience is down, and I think the over 25 audience is also much smaller than TDK. It is why some films even with good wom do not have very good legs, because they are only using some of the four quadrants. TDKR needed all four quadrants, and it is not getting them at full strength.

There are only so many under 25 males and females, and over 25 males and females. TDK made $158.4m. It made $79.2m from over 25 and $79.2m from under 25. It made $82.4 from males and $76m from females.

http://boxofficemojo.com/news/?id=2504&p=.htm

TDK OW

M>25: $41.2m
M<25: $41.2m
F >25: $38m
F<25: $38m

If TDKR overperformed in a certain area, it was most likely males under 25. What that did is it burned up demand in that demographic, but the other demo's are staying away. There is very little to pick up the slack. It makes the film look much more frontloaded that it would under normal circumstances. The shooting made the film more like ROTS or an HP film when the previous film was like a POTC, Avatar, and Avengers type film.

_________________
http://www.districtvibe.com/


Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:08 am
Profile WWW
Veteran

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:07 pm
Posts: 3004
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
Re-release is just not going to work in this day and age. If people want to wait, they will wait until they can see it at home.

_________________
http://www.districtvibe.com/


Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:09 am
Profile WWW
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
The same. I think the weekdays would not be so frontloaded otherwise. I know you could take that the other way, well you could try to connect any pattern to what happened, but it's pretty consistent with some other sequels and such and I would guess it would hold a bit better if there were an effect.

I'm still generally disappointed by the run.


Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:13 am
Profile ICQ
The Thirteenth Floor
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 15573
Location: Everywhere
Post Re: Serious discussion: What Would Batman Have Normally Made
TDK BTW maxed out any potential audience for good holds. This one was bound to be much more frontloaded.


Fri Jul 27, 2012 12:18 am
Profile ICQ
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 121 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Mr. Reynolds and 113 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.