Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Mar 28, 2024 4:51 am



Reply to topic  [ 3023 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 ... 121  Next
 Production Budgets 
Author Message
Child Actor

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:56 pm
Posts: 32
Post Re: Production Budgets
DP07 wrote:
Spiderman would have been. Harry Potter.

Not that it's needed, or pays off.


Maybe. I don't even know if those would justify that kind of scratch for the first film. Wrong director or writers and both franchises could have been smothered in their crib.


Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:20 pm
Profile
Homo Dperious
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 14460
Location: Everywhere
Post Re: Production Budgets
jj. wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Spiderman would have been. Harry Potter.

Not that it's needed, or pays off.


Maybe. I don't even know if those would justify that kind of scratch for the first film. Wrong director or writers and both franchises could have been smothered in their crib.


No, they were set before OW. Bad reactions could have hurt the sequels.


Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:29 pm
Profile ICQ
Child Actor

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:56 pm
Posts: 32
Post Re: Production Budgets
Yep, Cameron is the exception to every rule.


Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:30 pm
Profile
Homo Dperious
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 14460
Location: Everywhere
Post Re: Production Budgets
What about the rule that says the director of the highest grossing movie all time will repeat?


Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:31 pm
Profile ICQ
Child Actor

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:56 pm
Posts: 32
Post Re: Production Budgets
DP07 wrote:
jj. wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Spiderman would have been. Harry Potter.

Not that it's needed, or pays off.


Maybe. I don't even know if those would justify that kind of scratch for the first film. Wrong director or writers and both franchises could have been smothered in their crib.


No, they were set before OW. Bad reactions could have hurt the sequels.


There was certainly pent up demand for both franchises hitting the screen, but they got lucky with the right talent. 9 times out of 10 that's not happening. (Hence: going conservative with the first installment and blowing up with sequels)


Tue Mar 06, 2012 3:36 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post Re: Production Budgets
Magnus wrote:
jj. wrote:
DP07 wrote:
250m should only ever go to a very well know and popular property.


I can't even think of a property worth that risk for the first installment.


Avatar.

Avatar was no risk. Cameron delivers. Always. ;)

_________________
Image


Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:02 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post Re: Production Budgets
jj. wrote:
DP07 wrote:
jj. wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Spiderman would have been. Harry Potter.

Not that it's needed, or pays off.


Maybe. I don't even know if those would justify that kind of scratch for the first film. Wrong director or writers and both franchises could have been smothered in their crib.


No, they were set before OW. Bad reactions could have hurt the sequels.


There was certainly pent up demand for both franchises hitting the screen, but they got lucky with the right talent.

What? Harry Potter 1 is the poster child for mediocrity.

_________________
Image


Tue Mar 06, 2012 4:04 pm
Profile
Child Actor

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:56 pm
Posts: 32
Post Re: Production Budgets
Nazgul9 wrote:
jj. wrote:
DP07 wrote:
jj. wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Spiderman would have been. Harry Potter.

Not that it's needed, or pays off.


Maybe. I don't even know if those would justify that kind of scratch for the first film. Wrong director or writers and both franchises could have been smothered in their crib.


No, they were set before OW. Bad reactions could have hurt the sequels.


There was certainly pent up demand for both franchises hitting the screen, but they got lucky with the right talent.

What? Harry Potter 1 is the poster child for mediocrity.


But it was safe and didn't suck (ditto for Spider-Man). As weak as Columbus' entries were: he cast the talent and crafted the on-screen world. Without that, it could have been Narnia.


Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:18 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post Re: Production Budgets
I bet Carter doesn't suck either. The difference is, it isn't an adaptation of a hugely popular, contemporary book.

_________________
Image


Tue Mar 06, 2012 6:40 pm
Profile
Homo Dperious
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 am
Posts: 14460
Location: Everywhere
Post Re: Production Budgets
jj. wrote:
DP07 wrote:
jj. wrote:
DP07 wrote:
Spiderman would have been. Harry Potter.

Not that it's needed, or pays off.


Maybe. I don't even know if those would justify that kind of scratch for the first film. Wrong director or writers and both franchises could have been smothered in their crib.


No, they were set before OW. Bad reactions could have hurt the sequels.


There was certainly pent up demand for both franchises hitting the screen, but they got lucky with the right talent. 9 times out of 10 that's not happening. (Hence: going conservative with the first installment and blowing up with sequels)


I don't think there is any luck. Even movies like Tomb Raider, POTA, and The Village opened well regardless. Those all had less solid support.


Tue Mar 06, 2012 10:27 pm
Profile ICQ
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36915
Post Re: Production Budgets
Well I can't see how the marketing is ONLY $100m they have been marketing this like hell. I was thinking more like $130m-$150m marketing for John Carter but then again this in itself is quite shameful for Disney.

The signs are now ALL pointing at Disney having another Mars failure in March.


Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:02 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13041
Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
Post Re: Production Budgets
$211m BATTLESHIP

$40m according to Paramount / $70m according two people familiar with the production A THOUSAND WORDS

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/enterta ... 26+Buzz%29

_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U


Thu Mar 08, 2012 5:53 pm
Profile WWW
Ocarina of Time
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 1:21 pm
Posts: 7951
Location: Hyrule
Post Re: Production Budgets
mark66 wrote:
$211m BATTLESHIP

$40m according to Paramount / $70m according two people familiar with the production A THOUSAND WORDS

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/enterta ... 26+Buzz%29


211m?? Wtf, that's even a more outrageous budget than JC

_________________
Most Anticipated 2023

1. Super Mario Bros Movie
2. Rebel Moon
3. Mission Impossible Dead Reckoning Part 1
4. Oppenheimer
5. The Flash
6. Elemental
7. Aquaman 2
8. Dune Part 2
9. Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
10. Blue Beetle


Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:09 pm
Profile
Cream of the Crop
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:41 am
Posts: 2388
Location: Poland
Post Re: Production Budgets
mark66 wrote:
$211m BATTLESHIP

$40m according to Paramount / $70m according two people familiar with the production A THOUSAND WORDS

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/enterta ... 26+Buzz%29


Wow :shock: Good luck with making your money back to both movies. What a waste of money.


Thu Mar 08, 2012 6:12 pm
Profile WWW
The Wall
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 16163
Location: Croatia
Post Re: Production Budgets
Kitsch stars in Battleship too? OMG. The kid has some bad mojo it seems.


Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:33 pm
Profile WWW
Ocarina of Time
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 1:21 pm
Posts: 7951
Location: Hyrule
Post Re: Production Budgets
be.redy wrote:
Kitsch stars in Battleship too? OMG. The kid has some bad mojo it seems.


haha, forgot about that point!

_________________
Most Anticipated 2023

1. Super Mario Bros Movie
2. Rebel Moon
3. Mission Impossible Dead Reckoning Part 1
4. Oppenheimer
5. The Flash
6. Elemental
7. Aquaman 2
8. Dune Part 2
9. Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny
10. Blue Beetle


Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:51 pm
Profile
Dont Mess with the Gez
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:54 am
Posts: 22646
Location: Melbourne Australia
Post Re: Production Budgets
Yeah spending this much on a film like John Carter is ridiculous.

I suspect Carter was the reason Disney freaked out over Lone Ranger's budget and shut it down last year.

_________________


What's your favourite movie summer? Let us know @

http://worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=85934



Thu Mar 08, 2012 8:03 pm
Profile
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36915
Post Re: Production Budgets
I think we all knew that Battleship was costly but yeah an exact confirmation is just hitting hard. And yeah Taylor Kitsch is starring in two of the biggest budgeted movies this year, might not be a good idea going big time. Atleast Battleship looks a little better than John Carter, still regardless both movies will have tough time getting their money back from the theatrical run.

That is quite big for A Thousand Words even with troubled production $40m in itself is too damn expansive forget about $70m.

A really pricey weekend coming up with big flops left and right.


Thu Mar 08, 2012 10:06 pm
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 12:32 pm
Posts: 11289
Location: Germany
Post Re: Production Budgets
Again, Battleship looks expensive, dunno why you're acting so surprised.

_________________
Image


Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:18 am
Profile
Child Actor

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 10:56 pm
Posts: 32
Post Re: Production Budgets
I think Battleship has more of a chance of breaking out than Carter, but yeah: two big-time failures in a row could smother TK's leading man career before the summer is over.


Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:31 am
Profile
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36915
Post Re: Production Budgets
Nazgul9 wrote:
Again, Battleship looks expensive, dunno why you're acting so surprised.


Agreed Battleship with the latest trailers does look expensive. Plus I remember someone said earlier that shooting films over water is expensive and even though this movie will surely have city scenes I believe majority of it would have been shot over water.


Fri Mar 09, 2012 9:35 am
Profile
Extraordinary
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13041
Location: Augsburg (2,038 years young)
Post Re: Production Budgets
LAT:

$6m CASA DE MI PADRE
$42m 21 JUMP STREET

_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U


Thu Mar 15, 2012 6:56 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36915
Post Re: Production Budgets
That's great for both the openers this weekend.


Thu Mar 15, 2012 10:11 pm
Profile
Don't Dream It, Be It
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 12:45 pm
Posts: 37152
Location: The Graveyard
Post Re: Production Budgets
The Hunger Games
Budget: $100 million (or closer to $80 million with tax credits)
Marketing: $45 million

http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/ne ... 1753.story

_________________
Japan Box Office

“Gods are great ... but the heart is greater. For it is from our hearts they come, and to our hearts they shall return.”
“We were like gods at the dawning of the world, & our joy was so bright we could see nothing else but the other.”
“There are three things all wise men fear: the sea in storm, a night with no moon, and the anger of a gentle man.”
“You have to pretend you get an endgame. You have to carry on like you will; otherwise, you can't carry on at all.”
"Paper is dead without words / Ink idle without a poem / All the world dead without stories."


Fri Mar 16, 2012 2:04 am
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Idiot

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36915
Post Re: Production Budgets
The budget is still on high end for THG but not a bad investment.


Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:47 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 3023 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35 ... 121  Next

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 56 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.