| Author |
Message |
|
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm
Posts: 15197
Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Green Lantern Gunslinger wrote: Ah, yes, the "dismissive asshole" approach. Nice. That's Chippy's main schtick!
|
| Wed Jun 22, 2011 3:37 pm |
|
|
|
BK
Forum General
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am
Posts: 7041
|
Re: Green Lantern Chippy wrote: There will be a sequel. In your head.
_________________
Calls
Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2
Lorax over Despicable Me
Men in Black 3 Under 100m
Madagascar 3 Under 100m
Rise of the Guardians over 250m
|
| Thu Jun 23, 2011 12:33 am |
|
|
|
The Dark Shape
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
|
Re: Green Lantern Chippy wrote: There will be a sequel. Just about the same time Daredevil 2 rolls around.
|
| Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:52 am |
|
|
|
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
|
Re: Green Lantern The Dark Shape wrote: Chippy wrote: There will be a sequel. Just about the same time Daredevil 2 rolls around. 2014, right? _________________   1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
| Thu Jun 23, 2011 1:53 am |
|
|
|
The Dark Shape
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 3:56 am
Posts: 12119
Location: Adrift in L.A.
|
Re: Green Lantern Just as surely as Sam Raimi's Spider-Man 4.
|
| Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:18 am |
|
|
|
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
Re: Green Lantern Bradley Witherberry wrote: Gunslinger wrote: Ah, yes, the "dismissive asshole" approach. Nice. That's Chippy's main schtick!  _________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
| Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:04 pm |
|
|
|
_axiom
The Wall
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 10:50 am
Posts: 16163
Location: Croatia
|
Re: Green Lantern 5/10 -> C-
Made on the usual summer Hollywood blockbuster scheme - first 2/3 is the setup, and the last 1/3 consisting of mindless, special effects driven, action.
I didn't like the story. Very idiotic and naive and completely rushed and underdeveloped. More cartoon appropriate than for a feature movie. Ryan Reynolds is good in his (very ungrateful and asshole-ish) role. Even Blake Lively (aghhh, can't stand her) was decent.
Effects are sufficeable. The 3D was horrendous. I literally peaked every once in a while to see the screen without the glasses just to see a regular 2D picture.
I think that the story with superheroes who act as guardians of the universe can work, but not in this whole mythology. It's very LOLtastic.
|
| Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:39 am |
|
|
|
jmovies
Let's Call It A Bromance
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:22 pm
Posts: 12333
|
Re: Green Lantern Green Lantern was quite bad for a comic book movie. Everything Ryan Reynolds does while being the Green Lantern and saving others is hilariously awful (the racetrack scene in particular). Blake Lively is useless as expected and the villain is bad as well. The Green Lantern planet stuff was interesting but was underused. Whatever. *
|
| Sun Dec 11, 2011 2:48 am |
|
|
|
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
|
Re: Green Lantern I agree.
_________________1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
| Sun Dec 11, 2011 3:19 am |
|
|
