| Author |
Message |
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13056
Location: Augsburg (2,040 years young)
|
 Re: Production Budgets
_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U
|
| Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:27 pm |
 
|
|
|
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
|
Re: Production Budgets Nice
_________________   1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
| Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:35 pm |
|
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13056
Location: Augsburg (2,040 years young)
|
Re: Production Budgets
_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U
|
| Wed Mar 02, 2011 7:07 pm |
|
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36949
|
Re: Production Budgets LA I do understand the budget (it is very good actually) but TAB looks a little costly to me probably because of the paychecks of the cast involved...not sure though
|
| Wed Mar 02, 2011 8:51 pm |
|
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36949
|
Re: Production Budgets Yep so about 45%-50% on cast seems a bit big for this one. Though it has been tracking good there is still a chance that it doesn't do as well.
|
| Wed Mar 02, 2011 9:39 pm |
|
|
|
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am
Posts: 6245
|
Re: Production Budgets Seems high for AB to me, but I still think it will be a breakout performer so should be okay.
Find budget for LA, it's a big cgi movie and I think will recover that just fine.
Did we get numbers for Rango ever?
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
| Thu Mar 03, 2011 4:52 pm |
|
|
|
mark66
Extraordinary
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 2:41 pm
Posts: 13056
Location: Augsburg (2,040 years young)
|
Re: Production Budgets
_________________
Nothing Compares 2 U
|
| Thu Mar 03, 2011 6:40 pm |
|
|
|
movies35
Forum General
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:53 pm
Posts: 8627
Location: Syracuse, NY
|
Re: Production Budgets Holy shit @ Rango.
_________________
Top 10 Films of 2016
1. La La Land
2. Other People
3. Nocturnal Animals
4. Swiss Army Man
5. Manchester by the Sea
6. The Edge of Seventeen
7. Sing Street
8. Indignation
9. The Lobster
10. Hell or High Water
|
| Thu Mar 03, 2011 7:12 pm |
|
|
|
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
|
Re: Production Budgets Isn't that a fairly standard budget for that kind of movie?
_________________1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
| Thu Mar 03, 2011 7:17 pm |
|
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36949
|
Re: Production Budgets Very very big number for Rango. I don't see it making as much of a profit as I saw it making few days before 
|
| Thu Mar 03, 2011 7:33 pm |
|
|
|
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am
Posts: 6245
|
Re: Production Budgets Yeah I don't see anything wrong with that rango number. That's the standard of what DW march releases were (a touch below actually) and this is a high profile flick. I still think it will approach 200m domestic so that budget will be fine.
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
| Thu Mar 03, 2011 7:39 pm |
|
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36949
|
Re: Production Budgets I don't think the CGI looks better though I am biased because of the main character being so ugly Also this is not DW just Paramount and definitely not as high profile as well. We still have to wait and watch for the 200m domestic because even though Mars needs Moms looks bad it has some factors that would definitely work against Rango
|
| Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:02 pm |
|
|
|
David
Pure Phase
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
|
Re: Production Budgets Rango's animation looks AMAZING.
_________________1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game
|
| Thu Mar 03, 2011 9:10 pm |
|
|
|
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am
Posts: 6245
|
Re: Production Budgets Considering what Verbinski did with the POTC movies I'd assume Paramount gave him a pretty free reign and said "spend what you need to if it makes us money." This could be a terrible prediction but I see a big breakout here and I think their slight gamble will pay off big. 350m WW definitely looks possible to me.
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
| Fri Mar 04, 2011 2:39 am |
|
|
|
BK
Forum General
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am
Posts: 7041
|
Re: Production Budgets Budget looks astronomical.
Btw, GNOMEO is the only movie left without a known budget.
Disney doing their best to keep its inflated number out of the headlines.
_________________
Calls
Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2
Lorax over Despicable Me
Men in Black 3 Under 100m
Madagascar 3 Under 100m
Rise of the Guardians over 250m
|
| Fri Mar 04, 2011 5:08 am |
|
|
|
Dil
Forum General
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 9:48 pm
Posts: 8942
Location: Houston, Texas
|
Re: Production Budgets Battle: LA - $70M Mars Need's Mom's - $150M ( HOLY SHIT !) Red Riding Hood - $42M Link - http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/enterta ... -moms.html.
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 12:35 am |
|
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36949
|
Re: Production Budgets Good numbers for RRH and BLA. After seeing RRH it looked a little costly but since there are no known actors it could have been easier with that budget...btw terrible acting in the movie...yikes.
WOW for Mars Needs Mom. I don't know how can they spend this much on a movie and make it look so cheap? Somehow the graphics looks awful to me (and I was complaining a little about Rango but MNM looks even worse).
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:38 am |
|
|
|
Mesjarch
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:41 am
Posts: 2388
Location: Poland
|
Re: Production Budgets Twilight 4.1&4.2 - 263m $ 
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 5:40 pm |
|
|
|
BK
Forum General
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am
Posts: 7041
|
Re: Production Budgets lol wtf?
eclipse was 68 right?
wait 263 divided by two is not too bad. given pattinson, stewart and lautner all need to cash in for their last wooden, lazy performances before they have to actually rely on talent once more.
_________________
Calls
Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2
Lorax over Despicable Me
Men in Black 3 Under 100m
Madagascar 3 Under 100m
Rise of the Guardians over 250m
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 5:42 pm |
|
|
|
Mesjarch
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 5:41 am
Posts: 2388
Location: Poland
|
Re: Production Budgets It's 131.5m per movie.
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 5:45 pm |
|
|
|
Michael A
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 4:48 am
Posts: 6245
|
Re: Production Budgets Having read the books, there aren't really high energy action or intense sequences that should make them more expensive, but they'll still be massively profitable. Although I do think we'll see a decrease from Eclipse to the first installment, and another drop for the second. A lot of big twilight fans don't like the final book, it is chaotic, silly, and quite gross at a few parts, in addition to way over-long and not nearly enough material for two movies.
_________________Mr. R wrote: Malcolm wrote: You seem to think threatening violence against people is perfectly okay because you feel offended by their words, so that's kind of telling in itself. Exactly. If they don't know how to behave, and feel OK offending others, they get their ass kicked, so they'll think next time before opening their rotten mouths.
|
| Fri Mar 11, 2011 6:09 pm |
|
|
|
Jack Sparrow
KJ's Leading Idiot
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:15 pm
Posts: 36949
|
Re: Production Budgets BK wrote: Btw, GNOMEO is the only movie left without a known budget.
Disney doing their best to keep its inflated number out of the headlines. I am not starting to agree with BK on this. I mean GAJ looked a little more costly to me when you compared MNM which is outright pathetic for an animated flick. Though I still think the budget would be less than MNM and would still be around 100m or more. If we consider this then I guess the movie is just ok...even the over-performance is not that great.
|
| Sat Mar 12, 2011 11:05 pm |
|
|
|
almost famous
Indiana Jones IV
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:09 pm
Posts: 1461
Location: Odessa, Ukraine
|
Re: Production Budgets Jack Sparrow wrote: BK wrote: Btw, GNOMEO is the only movie left without a known budget.
Disney doing their best to keep its inflated number out of the headlines. I am not starting to agree with BK on this. I mean GAJ looked a little more costly to me when you compared MNM which is outright pathetic for an animated flick. Though I still think the budget would be less than MNM and would still be around 100m or more. If we consider this then I guess the movie is just ok...even the over-performance is not that great. Don't be stupid. This is not the major animated movie and Disney refused to make it and dropped it to Miramax. Miramax obviously had no such money and for a while Elton John looked like the only person to care about it. Later it was produced by some canadian animation company. You are all spoiled by Disney, Pixar and DreamWorks with their enourmous 150+ budgets. This is definitely not the case. I would say 40-50 million max. The Numbers by the way estimated it as 30 million.
|
| Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:20 am |
|
|
|
BK
Forum General
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 8:30 am
Posts: 7041
|
Re: Production Budgets Impossible considering this was in development for over 6 years and was retooled after Lasseter took over and said "Why are we releasing this?" when no one answered, he said "That's right, we're not"
The animation is also pretty good, it's not Alpha and Omega type of crap animation. I'd say between 70-90m.
_________________
Calls
Ghost Rider + Clash of the Titans = 2x Wrath of the Titans + Ghost Rider 2
Lorax over Despicable Me
Men in Black 3 Under 100m
Madagascar 3 Under 100m
Rise of the Guardians over 250m
|
| Sun Mar 13, 2011 7:52 am |
|
|
|
Mr. R
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 3:19 pm
Posts: 2231
|
Re: Production Budgets almost famous wrote: Don't be stupid. This is not the major animated movie and Disney refused to make it and dropped it to Miramax. Miramax obviously had no such money and for a while Elton John looked like the only person to care about it. Later it was produced by some canadian animation company.
You are all spoiled by Disney, Pixar and DreamWorks with their enourmous 150+ budgets. This is definitely not the case. I would say 40-50 million max. The Numbers by the way estimated it as 30 million. True! It was produced by Starz that previously did "9" for $30 m. This one is obviously higher with 3D and all. I say $50 m is pretty accurate.
|
| Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:22 am |
|
|
