Register  |  Sign In
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jul 20, 2025 6:53 pm



Reply to topic  [ 367 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
 Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion 
Author Message
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Dr. Lecter wrote:
BJ wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Seriously people bashing THL's win because it was so small is ridiculous. Wtach the freakin' film.

the characters in avatar were better



Wut???

oh its true, its true :thumbsup:

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:13 pm
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Libs wrote:
trixster wrote:
you fools


Seriously. What was "disappointing" about The Hurt Locker's box office, honestly? It was made for very little money and basically every movie about Iraq has flopped up to this point.

I don't know what numbers you're referring to when you say the DVD sales have only been just OK but they were very good in relation to its box office, from what I read. And the DVD rentals/sales are going to pick up substantially now that it has won Best Picture.

Also, these aren't the People's Choice Awards.


Eh, for an acclaimed (and actually rather accessible) movie like this one the box-office was not good. Then again, Summit didn't handle it well.

However, that's not the main point. What it boils down is is: Why the HOLY FUCK should the gross matter whatsoever in determining the winner?

tis a debate of quality thus avatanic will win every time.

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:14 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
BJ wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
BJ wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Seriously people bashing THL's win because it was so small is ridiculous. Wtach the freakin' film.

the characters in avatar were better



Wut???

oh its true, its true :thumbsup:


Yeah and Michael Bay is the auteur of our generation.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:14 pm
Profile WWW
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Dr. Lecter wrote:
BJ wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
BJ wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Seriously people bashing THL's win because it was so small is ridiculous. Wtach the freakin' film.

the characters in avatar were better



Wut???

oh its true, its true :thumbsup:


Yeah and Michael Bay is the auteur of our generation.

Michael Bay is shit compared to both Bigelow and Cameron.

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:17 pm
Profile WWW
KJ's Leading Pundit
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm
Posts: 63026
Location: Tonight... YOU!
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
You're a fool if you think Bigelow out directed Cameron.

_________________
trixster wrote:
shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element

trixster wrote:
chippy is correct

Rev wrote:
Fuck Trump


Mon Mar 08, 2010 3:33 pm
Profile
Pure Phase
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:33 am
Posts: 34865
Location: Maryland
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Why the HOLY FUCK should the gross matter whatsoever in determining the winner?


This should be in bold, giant letters.

Why the HOLY FUCK should the gross matter whatsoever in determining the winner?

Why? Because it's so true.

I am just glad these ridiculous, shallow, reactionary, gross-and-CGI-obsessed fools don't run a major awards show.

The Oscars aren't perfect, but their willingness to reward quality films which didn't gross nineteen billion dollars worldwide is not one of their faults.

_________________
ImageImageImage

1. The Lost City of Z - 2. A Cure for Wellness - 3. Phantom Thread - 4. T2 Trainspotting - 5. Detroit - 6. Good Time - 7. The Beguiled - 8. The Florida Project - 9. Logan and 10. Molly's Game


Mon Mar 08, 2010 4:50 pm
Profile
Indiana Jones IV
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 3:51 pm
Posts: 1102
Location: The Bronx
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Dr. Magnus wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Yeah and Michael Bay is the auteur of our generation.


His film of 2009 was better than Cameron's on an entertainment level.

Yep, and it has a Razzie to prove it :thumbsup: .


Mon Mar 08, 2010 6:00 pm
Profile WWW
You must have big rats
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 92093
Location: Bonn, Germany
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Hey, I mean in my case, it is often the bigger and more successful film that I like more. But I don't think that the budget or the success should matter at all.

_________________
The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!

Image


Mon Mar 08, 2010 6:51 pm
Profile WWW
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Samuel L. Jackson rolling his eyes was classic.


Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:47 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:53 pm
Posts: 12197
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Dr. Magnus wrote:
Harry Warden wrote:
Samuel L. Jackson rolling his eyes was classic.


Huh? When?


After Monique's acceptance speech I think?


Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:56 pm
Profile WWW
Orphan

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 5:47 pm
Posts: 19747
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Any word on why Swayze's name was never shown and Fawcett wasn't present at all during the In Memoriam segment?


Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:41 am
Profile
Killing With Kindness
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 8:57 pm
Posts: 25035
Location: Anchorage,Alaska
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Dr. Magnus wrote:
Dr. Lecter wrote:
Hey, I mean in my case, it is often the bigger and more successful film that I like more. But I don't think that the budget or the success should matter at all.


Indeed. I'll almost always favor a great blockbuster over most films.

The problem with Avatar is that it wasn't great...or even good.

bilge

_________________
The Force Awakens

Image


Tue Mar 09, 2010 2:28 am
Profile WWW
Online
On autopilot for the summer
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 21, 2004 10:14 pm
Posts: 21900
Location: Walking around somewhere
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Harry Warden wrote:
Any word on why Swayze's name was never shown and Fawcett wasn't present at all during the In Memoriam segment?


Because if two celebrities die on the same day, only the bigger one should get any recognition. I just love that the Wiz has cemented its place in film history for MJ to be acknowledged for a contribution to motion pictures.

Any thoughts on John Hughes?

_________________
Image

Chippy wrote:
As always, fuck Thegun.


Chippy wrote:
I want to live vicariously through you, Thegun!


Fri Mar 12, 2010 7:50 pm
Profile
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Yeah, he sucks, his handful of movies suck, and the ten minutes they spent fellating him was an offense to anyone who ever paid cash to watch a movie

_________________
k


Sat Mar 13, 2010 12:49 pm
Profile
The Lubitsch Touch
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm
Posts: 11019
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
and also to those who only watch them for free

_________________
k


Sat Mar 13, 2010 12:50 pm
Profile
Full Fledged Member

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 4:54 pm
Posts: 78
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
yoshue wrote:
Yeah, he sucks, his handful of movies suck, and the ten minutes they spent fellating him was an offense to anyone who ever paid cash to watch a movie

Well, he's not THAT b.... yeah, he is rather awful.


Sat Mar 13, 2010 10:08 pm
Profile
Extraordinary

Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:41 pm
Posts: 25109
Location: San Mateo, CA
Post Re: Official 2010 Academy Awards Discussion
Could The Secret in Their Eyes be in fact deserving of the Oscar win? 10 reviews so far at RT, all positive with an 8.7 average.

In a similar vein, The Secret of Kells was one of the biggest surprises on the nominations morning, but it is also receiving excellent reviews with 90%/7.7 at RT and 83 at MC.

_________________
Recent watched movies:

American Hustle - B+
Inside Llewyn Davis - B
Before Midnight - A
12 Years a Slave - A-
The Hunger Games: Catching Fire - A-

My thoughts on box office


Wed Mar 31, 2010 12:22 am
Profile WWW
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Reply to topic   [ 367 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 11, 12, 13, 14, 15

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group.
Designed by STSoftware for PTF.