|
|
|
|
The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008)
The Day the Earth Stood Still (2008)
Author |
Message |
Mr. Reynolds
Confessing on a Dance Floor
Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2004 12:46 am Posts: 5578 Location: Celebratin' in Chitown
|
 Re: The Day the Earth Stood Still [2008]
I really want to give this piece of crap an F but I guess the fact that I did get through it makes it deserve a D.
This movie is a perfect example where nothing distracts you from the huge plot holes, horrible dialogue, and condesending message the movie has. It was almost frustrating watching this garbage.
|
Sun Apr 12, 2009 4:18 pm |
|
 |
roo
invading your spaces
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:44 pm Posts: 6194
|
 Re: The Day the Earth Stood Still [2008]
My letter grade was F. I thought the first 15 minutes were fast and promising but it turned into nothing. The characters had no bond or chemistry, the story was predictable, the "nanos" were a disappointment and the effects, for a film of *this* scale were strange and insanely awful.
|
Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:31 pm |
|
 |
FILMO
The Original
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 10:19 am Posts: 9808 Location: Suisse
|
 Re: The Day the Earth Stood Still [2008]
2.5/10
that was boring and lame.
_________________Libs wrote: FILMO, I'd rather have you eat chocolate syrup off my naked body than be a moderator here.
|
Sat May 09, 2009 6:36 pm |
|
 |
Jmart
Superman: The Movie
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 8:47 am Posts: 21230 Location: Massachusetts
|
 Re: The Day the Earth Stood Still [2008]
I'm kind of half and half on this one. I liked Jennifer Connelly. I liked the fact that all of New Jersey gets destroyed, and I liked the message when they weren't beating us over the head with it (more on that in a second).
I guess the first problem I had with the film is the lack of emotion outside of Connelly. She's the heart of the film and does this only because she's able to elevate her character into a believable/emotional human being. Everyone else in the film seems to be lacking a soul and that's kind of a problem considering what might happen to them. Why are we worth saving again? Oh yeah, because of the scene in the graveyard and the scene under the bridge. The problem is 80 minutes have passed before we get to those scenes. Although they work they kind of feel false because they come almost out of nowhere.
(I'm still trying to figure out how they were protected under the bridge though. I think were supposed to assume Klaatu was doing something, but couldn't he have protected them outside. Wouldn't just as many of those bugs attack them under the bridge since they're still out in the open. This parenthesis has gone on too long. Sorry.)
Then there's Jaden Smith. Is it unfair to pick on a child actor (he is an actor after all)? Well, I'm gonna do it anyways. He was good in The Pursuit of Happyness. Maybe it was because he was with his dad the entire time he was on screen. Here, I'm not sure if it was the way his character was written or if it was him, but he doesn't work. The only reason he's in the film is for the scene at the very end, couldn't they have at least made him somewhat likable? To his constant questioning (I know kids question things, but after the first 20 minutes you think someone would've told him to shut the fuck up) to a horrible decision no kid or adult would make if they were paying attention to what was going on around him, I just wanted him to disappear.
Oh and there's the message. It's a good one. There was no need to beat us over the head with it though. You would think after a certain point the military would realize that nothing was going to stop them. Why even bother? And the constant stubbornness and lack of communication; it kind of reminded me of Crash in all the wrong ways.
Yet I was with the movie all the way through because of Reeves and Connelly (actually I was going to give this a decent grade until I actually thought about it). Reeves isn't exactly worth talking about because he's perfectly cast. I'm not even going to bother with a joke here because everyone's already said it. Connelly though keeps things moving. She's the heart of the film and she's good.
Everything outside of the Reeves/Connelly bubble doesn't exactly work as well as it should and that's the problem with the film. It's well intentioned and it's got some decent effects work, but nothing really comes together in the end.
**
_________________My DVD Collection Marty McGee (1989-2005)
If I’m not here, I’m on Letterboxd.
|
Mon May 25, 2009 2:43 am |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: The Day the Earth Stood Still [2008]
really bad
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Fri Jun 19, 2009 1:47 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: The Day the Earth Stood Still [2008]
Did you really expect any different?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Fri Jun 19, 2009 11:07 am |
|
 |
2001
Another You
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 5:38 am Posts: 4556
|
 Re: The Day the Earth Stood Still [2008]
A dissapointment for every sci-fi/disaster fan. Also the most foolishly marketed film ever.
C+
|
Sun Jun 21, 2009 1:20 am |
|
 |
Michael.
No Wire Tampons!
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 12:27 am Posts: 23283
|
 Re: The Day the Earth Stood Still [2008]
C/C-
Like The Invasion this movie had a lot of promise. Unlike The Invasion it does well to live up to NONE of it.
The defender guy was scary though.
_________________ I'm out.
|
Sat Aug 15, 2009 8:58 pm |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|