Saw this posted in 1 thread by Eagle, hope that the owners and ADM can do more on this as some here seem to like to ruin threads by talking about non thread topics.

[quote="Eagle"]Back on topic please.[quote]

Anyway, Good Job Eagle as I would like to see other Owners & Adm do more of this!

If you dont like every little comment said about your thread then dont read them or respond to them. Ive seen how you take every little criticism or comment way too personally. An example would be John Savage says you create too many threads and in return you called him a punk ass little know it all or something like that.

To be fair, John Savage is a punk ass.

would say let's get back on topic but as I need to correct you again, lets discuss.

and note even snack above catches it. Brownie Points for Snack.

Notice how John always adds in a biased insult instead of just asking a simple question. Think that would get anyone mad!

and here is an example of what he just posted today....can provide more examples if you need ...
* hmm, I can't decide whether this is typically idiotic or halfway worth pursuing......I'll make up my mind and get back to you

Your posting style sucks. U make no sense at all.

so give me examples or just don't read my threads > Seems pretty easy to do.

Don't read the spam. > Seems pretty easy to do.

Grill, I hope you enjoy boiling in Phlegethon for the violence committed by you against this forum and its posters.

seems like mainly the Oct 2004 people. so what is it with the Oct 2004 people that think they are so special and important that they must READ AND COMMENT ON EVERY THREAD ON THE BOARD.

Perhaps the admins could add a separate whole Grill sub-forum.

All the threads could be started by Grill, and then all the posts in each thread could be written by Grill.

This whole sub-forum could be authorized as strictly private and then made invisible to the rest of KJ.

not that I really had to check, yup > Oct 2004.

anyway, sure 2 or 3 threads are really such a problem.

so whatever as only the biggest crybabies on the board even care (yup the answer is > the Oct 2004 people).

Aren't you (Joined: 2008-01-28) the biggest crybaby?

no, far from it, all I am doing is defending myself. But they are the ones that are being true crybabies. As they just keep on coming into threads that they say they don't care about, just to whine and cry about them. ( see above ).

and unlike them I just ignore the 80 % of the threads that I don't care about.

which is what this thread was suppose to be about > Eagle's own words, I think > stay on topic!!!! or stay out of the thread????

ugh

Yes, please, can mods/admins do something? Like locking this thread?

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=51249

I mean this is really nonsense.

and why is it nonsense, Mr. Expert - seems like a good movie question to stir up movie talk! But anyway, exactly what is your problem with the question as it seems to bother you enough to call it out compared to all of the other threads on the site.

FYI. It is just general movie talk about the 2011 movies.

or you just trying to clear some space to dump more meaningless threads into the movie section.

********************************

Based on the 2009 Movie, what are thinking about these upcoming 2011 movies? Most Interesting, Most Anticipated, Where they might go, ......

Star Trek (2009) > Untitled Star Trek Sequel (2011)
X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009) > X-Men Origins: Magneto (2011)
Terminator Salvation (2009) > Terminator 5 (2011)

Grill, just stick to the sports forum.
Over there we don't mind you making weird thread/polls.

But why the damn poll and the stupid title then?

ok, I will go there Lecter, why do you make polls in all your anticipation threads?

I did it here because I wanted to find out the anticipation factor of those three 2011 movies: Star Trek, X-Men & Terminator.

and I don't think there is anything wrong with the title and for those who don't understand it, it is explained in the thread. Just as others do!

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=51249

7 out of 12 posts are by yourself. That's kinda spamming, no?

no not at all as all I am doing is answering others questions and having a conversation back and forth.

Also, just don't come into thread if you don't want to see answers.

and maybe some wouldn't be needed if the ADM enforced Eagle's, everyone stay on topic.

I really don't see why I've been nominated as the gang leader in this group of "we hate grill" posters. In reality I'm mostly apathetic to grill, I get annoyed by some of his dumber polls/threads and irritated when h reacts to every little post as if I were declaring how horrible his mother is or something, but in reality I am simply looking for a solution to his ridiculous reactions/spamming of dumb threads, and am not at all trying to bash him, harass him, or start any kind of fight.
Most of the time that is.

John, you little piece of ..... what a bunch of BS. Give me an exact example

and again as others have learned/know don't go into my stuff if you don't like the thread. Pretty damn easy.