Author |
Message |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: Watchmen
Yeah, the RDJ comparison really makes no sense.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Sun Mar 08, 2009 7:58 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: Watchmen
Jeffrey Dean Morgan/Dead Denny looks nothing like Robert Downey Jr? Javier Bardem, on the other hand, I can definitely see.
This must mean that Shonda Rhimes is desperately trying to cast Bardem in her new show, if her never-ending crush on JDM and constantly bringing back his character on Grey's Anatomy despite being DEAD and all means anything.
|
Sun Mar 08, 2009 10:54 pm |
|
 |
publicenemy#1
Extraordinary
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 12:25 am Posts: 19447 Location: San Diego
|
 Re: Watchmen
When I saw the teaser with the Dark Knight I thought he looked like Downey Jr. -shrug-
I'd really, really like to see Watchmen again.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:01 am |
|
 |
Chippy
KJ's Leading Pundit
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 4:45 pm Posts: 63026 Location: Tonight... YOU!
|
 Re: Watchmen
Every person I know thought he was RDJ.
I can... KINDA see it. But not at all.
_________________trixster wrote: shut the fuck up zwackerm, you're out of your fucking element trixster wrote: chippy is correct
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:08 am |
|
 |
billybobwashere
He didn't look busy?!
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 3:59 pm Posts: 4308
|
 Re: Watchmen
 it was just that image in the first trailer that threw everybody off - I thought it was RDJ for a while myself... at least, it looks more like him there than it does Bardem (though in real life they look like twins).
_________________ Retroviral VideosA film-based project created for the purpose of helping raise awareness about HIV/AIDS, specifically in South Africa.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:23 am |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Watchmen
I thought it was a great adaptation. Minor flaws would include the makeup on Nixon and Sally Jupiter, Goode's acting as Veidt earlier in the film (he improved a lot towards the end of the film as Ozymandias), and Akerman's acting throughout the entire thing. Wilson, Haley, Morgan, and Crudup all knocked their roles out of the park. The visuals were stunning, and I was amazed at how much of the story that Snyder was able to cram into 2 hours and 45 minutes.
Overall I'd give the theatrical cut an A- and I am very excited for the Director's Cut.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:22 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Watchmen
I don't get all the hate towards Malin Akerman.
With her slightly seedy tone and askew look, she exactly matched the style of the other Watchmen. I thought she was perfect for the role!
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:12 am |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Watchmen
Bradley Witherberry wrote: I don't get all the hate towards Malin Akerman.
With her slightly seedy tone and askew look, she exactly matched the style of the other Watchmen. I thought she was perfect for the role! How about the fact that the book version of that character is far more emotional? Akerman gave a pretty flat performance. Nowhere near as emotional as the character in the book itself.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 4:55 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Watchmen
redfirebird2008 wrote: Bradley Witherberry wrote: I don't get all the hate towards Malin Akerman.
With her slightly seedy tone and askew look, she exactly matched the style of the other Watchmen. I thought she was perfect for the role! How about the fact that the book version of that character is far more emotional? Akerman gave a pretty flat performance. Nowhere near as emotional as the character in the book itself. Damnit Dude - - I'm a movie fan, not a graphic novel reader! I'm judging her performance solely based within the context of the movie itself. I'll have to leave the inter-media analysis to the hardcore comic nerds, because I don't find such comparisons especially relevant or interesting...
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:04 am |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Watchmen
Bradley Witherberry wrote: redfirebird2008 wrote: Bradley Witherberry wrote: I don't get all the hate towards Malin Akerman.
With her slightly seedy tone and askew look, she exactly matched the style of the other Watchmen. I thought she was perfect for the role! How about the fact that the book version of that character is far more emotional? Akerman gave a pretty flat performance. Nowhere near as emotional as the character in the book itself. Damnit Dude - - I'm a movie fan, not a graphic novel reader! I'm judging her performance solely based within the context of the movie itself. I'll have to leave the inter-media analysis to the hardcore comic nerds, because I don't find such comparisons especially relevant or interesting... It's impossible to ignore the fact that she was pretty boring compared to the same character in the book.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:12 am |
|
 |
Bradley Witherberry
Extraordinary
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 1:13 pm Posts: 15197 Location: Planet Xatar
|
 Re: Watchmen
redfirebird2008 wrote: Bradley Witherberry wrote: redfirebird2008 wrote: Bradley Witherberry wrote: I don't get all the hate towards Malin Akerman.
With her slightly seedy tone and askew look, she exactly matched the style of the other Watchmen. I thought she was perfect for the role! How about the fact that the book version of that character is far more emotional? Akerman gave a pretty flat performance. Nowhere near as emotional as the character in the book itself. Damnit Dude - - I'm a movie fan, not a graphic novel reader! I'm judging her performance solely based within the context of the movie itself. I'll have to leave the inter-media analysis to the hardcore comic nerds, because I don't find such comparisons especially relevant or interesting... It's impossible to ignore the fact that she was pretty boring compared to the same character in the book. Not if you haven't read the book.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:15 am |
|
 |
redfirebird2008
Cream of the Crop
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:13 am Posts: 2483
|
 Re: Watchmen
Bradley Witherberry wrote: redfirebird2008 wrote: Bradley Witherberry wrote: redfirebird2008 wrote: Bradley Witherberry wrote: I don't get all the hate towards Malin Akerman.
With her slightly seedy tone and askew look, she exactly matched the style of the other Watchmen. I thought she was perfect for the role! How about the fact that the book version of that character is far more emotional? Akerman gave a pretty flat performance. Nowhere near as emotional as the character in the book itself. Damnit Dude - - I'm a movie fan, not a graphic novel reader! I'm judging her performance solely based within the context of the movie itself. I'll have to leave the inter-media analysis to the hardcore comic nerds, because I don't find such comparisons especially relevant or interesting... It's impossible to ignore the fact that she was pretty boring compared to the same character in the book. Not if you haven't read the book. Even then, her performance is about as flat as it gets. There's simply not much there, even if you haven't read the book. She's nearly as lifeless as Crudup's Manhattan. 
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:26 am |
|
 |
MovieDude
Where will you be?
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2004 4:50 am Posts: 11675
|
 Re: Watchmen
Surprise surprise, I'm siding with Bradley. Considering she was one of the least flashy roles, I thought she held her own commendably. Her character is displayed with her relationships to men, but I never once thought she was particularly incapable. I would blame the way comic books have always regarded female heroes, and to a lesser extent Snyder's understanding of the male psyche (or lack thereof of the opposite) on any percieved weakness on Akerman's part. And in retrospect, while she may have been younger than the comic book character, she certainly impressed me with her brave performance in The Heartbreak Kid - certainly the best part of that forgettable snack.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 5:41 am |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: Watchmen
Dr. Lecter wrote: Captain Metropolis wrote: Brilliant. WB cracked down and the credits were removed. They popped up again here http://www.thinkhero.com/2009/03/07/wat ... -sequence/
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 10:17 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: Watchmen
I thought Malin Akerman was bland, but I thought was true of pretty much the entire main cast other than Jackie Earle Haley. So, no, she wasn't horrendous or anything.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:39 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Watchmen
Libs wrote: I thought Malin Akerman was bland, but I thought was true of pretty much the entire main cast other than Jackie Earle Haley. So, no, she wasn't horrendous or anything. Hmm, Jeffrey Dean Morgan was pretty great as well, no?
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:40 am |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: Watchmen
Dr. Lecter wrote: Libs wrote: I thought Malin Akerman was bland, but I thought was true of pretty much the entire main cast other than Jackie Earle Haley. So, no, she wasn't horrendous or anything. Hmm, Jeffrey Dean Morgan was pretty great as well, no? Yeah, I was including him and Carla Gugino as not "the main cast."
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:43 am |
|
 |
Loyal
"no rank"
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 8:43 pm Posts: 24502
|
 Re: Watchmen
Patrick Wilson's performance won me over on my second viewing. There's a sadness to his character and he's earnest. Closest thing IMO of how a real vigilante would look and operate.
If there's anyone that absolutely brings nothing to the role, its Matthew Goode. I know the producers didn't need to spend even more money but the role of Ozymandias would have worked better with an A-list actor.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:45 am |
|
 |
Dr. Lecter
You must have big rats
Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2004 4:28 pm Posts: 92093 Location: Bonn, Germany
|
 Re: Watchmen
Captain Metropolis wrote: Patrick Wilson's performance won me over on my second viewing. There's a sadness to his character and he's earnest. Closest thing IMO of how a real vigilante would look and operate.
If there's anyone that absolutely brings nothing to the role, its Matthew Goode. I know the producers didn't need to spend even more money but the role of Ozymandias would have worked better with an A-list actor. Intersting. I actually thought Goode worked well as Ozymandias because Ozymandias is actually supposed to look bland and arrogant and he pulls that off well Wilson didn't work for me at all and neither did Akerman (but Wilson bothered me more since his role was actually more integral, IMO). The only acting stand-out's, as I said, are Morgan and Haley...but Gugino does very well in her few scenes. Hope to see more of her on DVD. BTW, what was up with Moloch's ears? It's a while that I read the comics...
_________________The greatest thing on earth is to love and to be loved in return!
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 11:48 am |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
 Re: Watchmen
An indulgent pop nightmare.
I actually walked out and hung in the lobby with a friend for most of the last third. I returned to see Matthew Goode (whose eye-poppingly mannered performance is probably the worst) give his hilarious Agatha Christie-style "talking killer" speech, made all the funnier because I did not have the immediate context.
The theater quickly became hostile toward this thing. I've never seen a full theatre explode in derisive laughter the way they did at the sex scene set to some strange tone deaf James Brown-ish version of 'Hallelujah'. Although Billy Crudup's endless monotone monologue about his origin came close. Yikes!
_________________ k
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:01 pm |
|
 |
Libs
Sbil
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 3:38 pm Posts: 48678 Location: Arlington, VA
|
 Re: Watchmen
I knocked this down a little bit grade-wise, I'm at a B rather than a B+ now. Many parts of it have already faded from my memory, so.
I know a lot of people don't like 300, but I absolutely loved that, and Watchmen is not nearly as memorable to me in certain respects.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:12 pm |
|
 |
Jonathan
Begging Naked
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2004 12:07 pm Posts: 14737 Location: The Present (Duh)
|
 Re: Watchmen
yoshue wrote: set to some strange tone deaf James Brown-ish version of 'Hallelujah'. Uh, that's the original version from Leonard Cohen.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:16 pm |
|
 |
Johnny Dollar
The Lubitsch Touch
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 5:48 pm Posts: 11019
|
 Re: Watchmen
SHUT THE FUCK UP NO WAY
Well, it felt uncomfortable, at any rate.
I've only heard the Wainright one. Because that's what TV producers like to use in their montages.
_________________ k
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:17 pm |
|
 |
Christian
Team Kris
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 5:02 pm Posts: 27584 Location: The Damage Control Table
|
 Re: Watchmen
When I close my eyes and just listen to Akerman talk, I still hear Cameron Diaz. It's kind of eerie to me.
_________________A hot man once wrote: Urgh, I have to throw out half my underwear because it's too tight.
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:43 pm |
|
 |
trixster
loyalfromlondon
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2004 6:31 pm Posts: 19697 Location: ville-marie
|
 Re: Watchmen
Christian wrote: When I close my eyes and just listen to Akerman talk, I still hear Cameron Diaz. It's kind of eerie to me. THAT'S WHO SHE SOUNDS LIKE. Thanks Christian. That was driving me nuts.
_________________Magic Mike wrote: zwackerm wrote: If John Wick 2 even makes 30 million I will eat 1,000 shoes. Same. Algren wrote: I don't think. I predict. 
|
Mon Mar 09, 2009 12:47 pm |
|
|