World of KJ
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/

Sunday 2/25 Ratings
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=27899		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Plot [ Mon Feb 26, 2007 1:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Sunday 2/25 Ratings
Source: http://pifeedback.com/eve/forums/a/tpc/ ... m/62610163

1. "The 79th Annual Academy Awards" (ABC) 39.48
2. "Road to the 2007 Oscars" (ABC) 32.93
3. "Barbara Walters Oscar Special" (ABC) 19.66
4. "NASCAR Nextel Cup Overrun" (FOX) 11.96
5. "60 Minutes" (CBS) 9.25
6. "Without A Trace" (R, CBS) 8.38
7. "The Simpsons" (R, FOX) 8.37
8. "The Amazing Race: All Stars" (CBS) 8.19
9. "Family Guy" (R, FOX) 7.88
10. "The Simpsons" (R, FOX) 7.83
11. "Cold Case" (R, CBS) 7.24
12. "Crossing Jordan" (NBC) 6.66
13. "Dateline" (NBC) 5.01
14. "Grease: You're the One That I Want" (NBC) 4.59
15. "Crossing Jordan" (R, NBC) 4.11
16. "Reba" (R, CW) 2.90
17. "7th Heaven" (R, CW) 2.42
18. "Beauty and the Geek" (R, CW) 1.28
Author:  Christian [ Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:06 pm ]
Post subject: 
FOX repeats did really, really well. I'm assuming it did well with Men 18-34, the demo that the Oscars keep on courting.

Poor Amazing Race got hit.
Author:  Jedi Master Carr [ Mon Feb 26, 2007 2:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
So it beat last year by about a million that isn't bad.
Author:  jujubee [ Mon Feb 26, 2007 3:28 pm ]
Post subject: 
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
So it beat last year by about a million that isn't bad.

Well, it was live, so it could go up or down by a lot in the finals.
Author:  O [ Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:24 pm ]
Post subject: 
From zap2it:

-red-carpet special: 19.7/29

-24.0/34 at 8 p.m.

-24.6/35 at 9 pm

-22.1/35 at 10 pm

They really needed to throw in something big from 9-10 pm. Every big thing felt rushed right at the end (at 11:30 or 45), and even throwing in something else other than one supporting would have helped...
Author:  Raffiki [ Mon Feb 26, 2007 4:32 pm ]
Post subject: 
I'm quite disappointed actually.

I really thought it would outdo last year by a large margin. The ads everywhere were great, Ellen was hosting, considerably more mainstream and accessible fare than last years' Best Pic nominees. I'm a bit confused.
Author:  MikeQ. [ Mon Feb 26, 2007 5:34 pm ]
Post subject: 
jujubee wrote:
Jedi Master Carr wrote:
So it beat last year by about a million that isn't bad.

Well, it was live, so it could go up or down by a lot in the finals.


Really - by a lot? Has that every meant anything in previous years? When do we get finals?

Peace,
Mike.
Author:  DP07 [ Mon Feb 26, 2007 8:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
Raffiki wrote:
I'm quite disappointed actually.

I really thought it would outdo last year by a large margin. The ads everywhere were great, Ellen was hosting, considerably more mainstream and accessible fare than last years' Best Pic nominees. I'm a bit confused.


It's on a downward longterm trend.
Author:  jujubee [ Mon Feb 26, 2007 10:47 pm ]
Post subject: 
Raffiki wrote:
I'm quite disappointed actually.

I really thought it would outdo last year by a large margin. The ads everywhere were great, Ellen was hosting, considerably more mainstream and accessible fare than last years' Best Pic nominees. I'm a bit confused.

You answered your own question right there. :D (I mean, doesn't anyone remember when she hosted the Emmys? It was horrible horrible stuff. So I made sure not to even TiVo the Oscars.)

MikeQ wrote:
Really - by a lot? Has that every meant anything in previous years? When do we get finals?

Anything that is aired live gets very inexact fast national ratings. I'm not sure of the reason, but it can be off by a couple million in either direction. The finals may have been posted on PIFeedback, since they are available to Nielsen customers by afternoon, usually, but they will definitely be available to everyone by Tuesday, when abcmedianet.com posts them.
Author:  Jmart [ Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:15 am ]
Post subject: 
O wrote:

-24.6/35 at 9 pm

-22.1/35 at 10 pm


That drop doesn't surprise me. Actually, I'm somewhat surprised that many people held on. The first three hours were incredibly uninteresting for me. I just can't imagine what it was like for someone who only had just a passing interest in the show.
Author:  Magic Mike [ Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:23 am ]
Post subject: 
jujubee wrote:
Raffiki wrote:
I'm quite disappointed actually.

I really thought it would outdo last year by a large margin. The ads everywhere were great, Ellen was hosting, considerably more mainstream and accessible fare than last years' Best Pic nominees. I'm a bit confused.

You answered your own question right there. :D (I mean, doesn't anyone remember when she hosted the Emmys? It was horrible horrible stuff. So I made sure not to even TiVo the Oscars.)


Well I thought she was absolutely hilarious and the best Oscar host I've seen. Oscar hosts usually always disappoint, but not this time. She was great.
Author:  jujubee [ Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:04 pm ]
Post subject: 
Final total viewers for the Oscars: 40,172,000
Author:  Spidey [ Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:20 pm ]
Post subject: 
Mike wrote:
jujubee wrote:
Raffiki wrote:
I'm quite disappointed actually.

I really thought it would outdo last year by a large margin. The ads everywhere were great, Ellen was hosting, considerably more mainstream and accessible fare than last years' Best Pic nominees. I'm a bit confused.

You answered your own question right there. :D (I mean, doesn't anyone remember when she hosted the Emmys? It was horrible horrible stuff. So I made sure not to even TiVo the Oscars.)


Well I thought she was absolutely hilarious and the best Oscar host I've seen. Oscar hosts usually always disappoint, but not this time. She was great.


I agree. I hope she hosts again.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/