Well, I think that's great. I was honestly expecting a number somewhere near 30 million.
I guess stewart and all that [s]jazz[/s] advertising on billboards of every other corner and street you turn in LA helped
| World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| Sunday 3/6 Ratings (Berman is back!!!) http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=17521 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Plot [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 12:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Sunday 3/6 Ratings (Berman is back!!!) |
Source: http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/newsletters ... /index.jsp 1. "The 78th Annual Academy Awards" (ABC) 27.0/40 2. "The Oscar Pre-Show" (ABC) 10.7/17 3. "60 Minutes" (CBS) 7.6/12 4. "CSI" (R, CBS) 7.3/11 5. "Cold Case" (R, CBS) 6.2/9 6. "Criminal Minds" (R, CBS) 5.8/8 7. "Dateline" (NBC) 5.4/8 8. "Law & Order: Criminal Intent" (R, NBC) 4.9/7 9. "Crossing Jordan" (R, NBC) 3.6/6 10. "Movie: Bad Boys 2" (FOX) 3.6/5 11. "Malcolm in the Middle" (FOX) 2.7/4 12. "Reba" (R, WB) 2.0/3 13. "Movie: 8 Mile" (WB) 2.0/3 |
|
| Author: | Raffiki [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 2:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
How does that compare with previous Oscars? does not seem as low as 2003's that's for sure. Or am I totally off? |
|
| Author: | Shack [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 2:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Seems decent if you ask me. |
|
| Author: | Christian [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 2:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Raffiki wrote: How does that compare with previous Oscars? does not seem as low as 2003's that's for sure. Or am I totally off? It's way above 03 I think. It could score from 38 - 40 million |
|
| Author: | Cotton [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 2:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Are those the overnights or fast-nationals?? |
|
| Author: | Christian [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Overnights. Raffi, the 2003 Oscars got a 25.5/37. From Variety: Quote: The top five highest-rated markets were New York (36.5/51), Chicago (33.2/47), San Francisco (31.7/51), Philadelphia (31.7/46) and Atlanta (30.7/43). So... Los Angeles does not care (that much) anymore, lol. |
|
| Author: | neo_wolf [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 5:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Comparatively, that was a decline of 10 percent in rating and three share points from The Academy Awards telecast in 2005 |
|
| Author: | Raffiki [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 6:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Well, I think that's great. I was honestly expecting a number somewhere near 30 million. I guess stewart and all that [s]jazz[/s] advertising on billboards of every other corner and street you turn in LA helped
|
|
| Author: | Michael. [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
You say Berman is back!!!! like its a good thing I'd say it more like "Oh god some things just wont go away, Like acne and Marc Berman" Infact, the Oscar Ratings were the 2nd worst since 1987 38.8m viewers, down 8% |
|
| Author: | Plot [ Mon Mar 06, 2006 11:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Michelangelo wrote: You say Berman is back!!!! like its a good thing I'd say it more like "Oh god some things just wont go away, Like acne and Marc Berman" A more accurate statement would be "TV ratings at 11:00 EST are back! Which somewhat makes up for the fact that Berman comes back with them" |
|
| Author: | Raffiki [ Tue Mar 07, 2006 12:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Considering how many people of those 38 million watching had actually seen more than 2 or 3 of the movies nominated in the top 8 categories, I'd say 38 million viewers is quite good. Very good. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|