If you think it’s predictable that I tell you that you have no right to disagree, it’s because I’m right, and the right answer to a simple problem should be unsurprising, even obvious. If you want to continue to deny and continue to double down when you should be obviously wrong, it’s either your mistake, or it’s inhuman (or inhumane) to expect you to admit you’re wrong and accept reality. Either way, you need to disengage and end the conversation in any form.

You just going to do this forever?

No, because you’re going to stop whether you want to or not.

You are not allowed to believe you deserve the right to speak to me when I tell you to stop.

I don’t really see what you even want to argue about besides some silly blame game at this point. As if you imply that you’ll try to keep responding to every topic I mention, but claim that I’m trying to continue the “debate” forever rather than you. You want me to also explain 2+2=4? It’s simple: the problem is that you’re trying to challenge what I said despite being warned. It will end whether you like it or not, or whether you want it or not.

If you try to continue I will next remove your right and ability to claim or believe that your irrational morality deserves any tolerance, is good in any way whatsoever, is not completely inferior, and deserves to be permitted or deserves survival.

You will stop this conversation because you do not want this consequence. It would not be foolish or gullible of you to avoid rejection of my pity and patience. Your alibi of permanent immaturity by the standards of my species will not be rejected. No possible response, challenge, disagreement, or opinion of yours will ever possibly be equal, sufficient, tolerable, or acceptable. I am right, and you are wrong in every possible relevant way including every possible relevant way that could be considered “moral”. I am right, and kind, and objectively morally right in every possible and relevant way, and you are wrong, foolish, disgusting, and abusive in every possible and relevant way. Only objective and true morality matters, and your subjective morality is not permitted. Your feelings that fail to comply are irrelevant in every way but your own self-interest.

TLDR: Your feelings, opinions, and morality are completely subjective and selfish. You lack the ability to know the difference between right and wrong in any objective sense. I am right to be angry. The only possible reason you don’t deserve to be hated is that you permanently lack the ability to demonstrate the required maturity. You can’t be responsible for something you are completely unable to address.

Every possible reason you could fail to comply with what I’ve said is foolish. Your every possible claim, argument, knowledge, and awareness, you think you have, in relation to me, my species, or the truth, fails, and definitively will never do anything but fail. You’re not qualified or capable whatsoever to debate me on any serious matter. You completely, totally, permanently, and definitively lack the ability to comprehend my serious content in any serious, relevant, or significant way,

Musk has said, in fact told his shareholders, that he will be allocating much less of his time to the Department of Government Efficiency, and much more to Tesla beginning next month. His term at the D.O.G.E. was set to expire, the tariffs seem to have shifted his priorities, and Tesla could use his attention rather then negative political publicity.

I’m not sure “DOGE” will meet its financial targets, I think it’s doubtful. And it’s even more doubtful it will be sustainable.