Your completely disgusting, insidious legacy is finished and has no future whatsoever.

Also, you have to consider yourself warned since I did warn you before about this. Your human perspective and assumptions about human nature are limited to your own species, and have limited to no relevance, certainly in the way you expect, in regards to my own new species. I’m not going to keep repeating that your assumptions about human nature are based on circular thinking. They simply are generally not applicable to my own new species, or are generally limited in applicability to a limited maturity. So, your experience and expectations will be disappointed outside the parameters of your culture, species, and the limitations of your environmental control.

So, these expectations about gender etc. may be flawed and incomplete in describing the human nature of your own species, but they have almost no relevance to my species to begin with, and even less relevance with time and maturity (whether maturity from birth, or in relationship with my new species).

The implication of your post is that women will be emotionally irrational, or more emotionally irrational than men. That’s the problem with your attitude. You assume that either men are more rational emotionally, or that they are less emotional, and therefore supposedly more rational. Either way, you’re certainly playing into the cliche or stereotype. To say that women will have a greater tendency to be irrational because of emotion is simply sexist, no other way to try to spin it.

Say what you want about men and competition, risk, relationships, or sex, all of that is besides the point regarding reason, emotion, and women.

Yes, shack, this is even regardless of species. So, don’t try to distort the issue with that.