If Dino is elected President, I will lead the exodus back to BOM.

---------- Explicit nudity is not allowed in posts on the forum.

> Is loyals thread considered explicit as it show a naked mans balls.

Similarly, profanity is an expression of oneself, and so long as that expression is not hostile to another, it is acceptable on this forum.

> Tough one. If the curse is used as an adjective about a movie or somethng. it would be ok but then you really shouldn't cutse at another.

5) Treat thy fellow poster as you would have oneself be treated!
---------- Attacks directed at someone in a personal manner are not allowed. Do not attack a person's character, looks, social life, etc.


> This one allows bothered me. Think it should be tighten up.

For example.

I always would give it back to someone hard who started with me. And I would get yelled at by the adms and mods.

Libs gets abused and cursed at by at least one and nothing is ever said.

Chip used to comment with insults. Which never got him in trouble.


These commandments are the foundation of the forums rules, an administration may expand and/or add to them, but they must form the basis for the communities rules.


1) Owners can remove the President at any time and assume control, should the need arise.
2) The process begins on June 1st and ends on July 1st.
3) The new President takes office on August 1st.

> Maybe should include all of the presidents team.

>Too long on the switch over. Shouldn't be more than a week after annoucement. Too much time for trouble to occur. And if time is needed maybe nebs fills in for a week or he/the owners takes over if any trounble happens.

KJ

Does anyone else agree with Grill regarding the delay before the new team takes office? The plan was that the old team and old President remain in place while the new President gets to work finding staff and setting up how things will be run.

I envision setting up the new President's moderation forum immediately after the win, and thus allowing time to slowly build a team and begin work behind the scenes with getting everyone on the same page.

It's not as though the forum will be reckless in the interim, the current administration would continue handling things.

Grill,

These rules are not set. The current administration is responsible for moderating the forum, if you feel Loyal's thread violates some existing rule, please take it up with them. This is not the place. This is a place for discussion of the FUTURE rules of the site, not the current.

In general, the rule means no explicit nudity visible on this site, and that's pretty much non negotiable.

OK but I did ask this question earlier...as I would think showing a totally naked person is considered explicit nudity so I was hoping for a re-write of the rules or just a clarification. No Big Deal.

---------- Explicit nudity is not allowed in posts on the forum.

> Is loyals thread considered explicit as it show a naked man's everything.

No, it's not explicit Goldie.

If you're referring to the thread in which he links to an off-site image containing explicit nudity, no that does not count.

geez, Loyals post was a link and it wasnt embedded or sexual in any way.

hello, it was just a question > as it lead to a video of a totally naked man! If that is fine so be it but than a major complaint > I want to see more than bring us to naked ladies!!!

Christ, this is a bad idea. And yet I'm morbidly fascinated to see how it turns out.

Argos makes a good point, but would you have a GERMAN as your president? I certainly would not. He comes from the same country as Adolf Hitler and Dr. Lecter.

And Hitler was Austrian, not German, Dummkopf.