The poor dead horses' corpses are being violated to an unhealthy degree.

Libs is unravelled.

Put him on ignore, Libs.

Ignoring people just makes it more tempting to read. Because you KNOW that idiocy is one click away.

That's why I have never put Chip on ignore. Idiocy in its full glory.

BKB's lost it anyway. Back in the day when he had made up stories about a love affair with a 70-year-old named Debra and predicted $50m opening weekend for The Amityville Horror, he was entertaining. Now even he realizes how lame he is. It's sorta sad.

Hmm, I don't think his BKB-typical behavior deserves a banning. I will, however, consider locking him out of the Critics forum for the next couple of months if he keeps posting in the Inception thread without adding anything substantial.

I mean, come on. Do we really need to see "INCEPTION SUXXXXXXXXXXXX ICANTZ SPELL IM ADUMBASS WEED FUCK YEAHH AMURCCA" in EVERY SINGLE THREAD on this forum? It's exhausting.

I hope it is not upon you to decide what is substantial.

It is.

No, just send me (or the mods) examples when it gets too much and it might get deleted.

Anyhow BKB would eventually self-ban himself with some stupid bet hes probably going to make.

Actually, it's spelled INCEPTION SUCKS, not with an XXXXXXXXX School teacher wannabe.. And since when did I bring weed into the discussion and if anyones exhausting Libs, it's YOU for following me post to post like your fucking stalking me.. I'm gonna have a field day with this over the weekend and Lecter, your not locking ANYONE out.. That's a bunch of childish bullshit right there bud.. You all need to relax a little and stop taking shit so damn seriously for your own good, for your own sanity.. And Libs, that little outburst of yours above can be best cured with PAMPRIN: A womans best friend for that time of the month..

Every post he makes is too much, so rather than taking the time to delete all of his posts you could just ban him. He does not even attempt to contribute anything of value, thus he should not be here.

I find it really silly that Argos was banned from this site but BKB and Grill have not been.

If I were administrator, no one would be banned, not even Dr. Lecter.

Didn't you promise to leave not only this site but all online movie sites forever if Avatar grossed over 650m WW? Guess what BKB, it broke that domestic. So you shouldn't have to be banned, you should be gone forever by your own admission.

Arthur, if you refuse to ban him fine. But PLEASE prevent him from doing this to the critic forum:
Bradley Witherberry wrote:
Fantastic.

What a summer movie! The Sorcerer's Apprentice combines b-movie charm with a solid, solid screenplay which provides a foundation for all the melodrama, humor, and yes, even horror in a beautifully produced cinematic oasis amidst the vast arid desert of quality know as 2010. Seriously, the screenwriters obviously "get it" - - they know that there's still a way to conjure up a crackin' good story out of the cultural archetypes of the past. They lay the exposition on thick, right out of the gate, and the viewer is immersed in the millennial old tale careening to it's spectacular conclusion on the big screen in front of us. Then all the acting was top notch - - this is my fourth Jay Baruchel film so far this year, except for the disappointment that was HTTYD, all were great films. Nicholas Cage was perfect here, what with his trademark super dry campy seriousness. Alfred Molina made a truly threatening bad guy, though with an excellent flare of comic undercurrent. And Teresa Palmer as "Becky" played the most perfectly ultra-romantic love interest - - I'm looking forward to seeing a lot more of her!

If only all Hollywood products could all be this cool! The Sorcerer's Apprentice had exactly the vibe that the recent version of Sherlock Holmes needed to save it from being the unfocused drag it turned out to be. One can clearly see that producer Jerry Bruckheimer brings the best of his talents from decades of experience to bear in balancing all the elements to create this fine film. This is a movie so finely crafted, that I imagine that it would be just as entertaining to a theatre audience in 1936, 1953, 1968, 1981, 1997, 2010, and for the whole stream of years into the future. It's that timeless.

It's funny... it's romantic... it's way, way melodramatic... it's authentically frightening at times... it's a non-stop unequivocal blast!

The Sorcerer's Apprentice is the real deal: a well told tale - - a new classic is born.


18 out of 5.




{Don't forget not to miss the super secret after-credits scene. Look out sequel, here we come!}


And this is going up directly against INCEPTION this weekend??? That's a pretty good review considering how other sites have slammed this.. Any chance this could be thre stunning upset winner this weekend given it is from Disney???

If he needs to troll up box office and cinemania fine, but he has no reason to post in the critics forum at all.

After all these years, people still don't listen to me on how to not let BKB bother them, so I don't see this as BKB's problem. Sorry.

Holy fuck!! That was an honest question you fucking Mo-Mo.. I really asked him in all seriousness if a Disney movie had a chance at beating a movie that seems boring and a little too overly serious like INCEPTION and regardless of Sorcerer Apprentice's mixed reviews, kids don't give a fuck about reviews and it seem like it might have a shot at giving Nolans movie a run for it's $$$ this weekend.. WTF is so bad about that Savage?? Is this really THAT hard to comprehend you fucking stooge???

It's the critic review thread. He expressed his opinion of a movie which led to you asking him perposturous questions about its' box office potential and making your rambling assumptions and assertions, which had NOTHING to do with the thread.

This 'stay on topic, do not pass go' policy might be the worst invention since god.