Thegun wrote:
Glassless 3d already exists, its called sight
James Cameron, give me sight beyond sight!
| World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetime http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=62789 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | resident [ Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetime |
Not theatrically. http://www.gamespot.com/news/6310237.ht ... bj=6310237 Quote: Cameron said he does not expect glasses-free 3D viewing technology to come to theaters in his lifetime, but he does expect the technology to arrive for in-home viewing, as he sees it as a necessity. This is a sad statement. Do you think he's kidding, or maybe misdirecting our attention while planning a surprise in 2012? I'm thinking of ways to do it and I'm not even getting paid for it. Why isn't he? |
|
| Author: | Bradley Witherberry [ Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetim |
2D movies are already in 3D as far as our brains are concerned - - Cameron's talking about this fakoid stereoscopy they keep trying to pawn off on us as "3D". It's time for the rubes to wake up. |
|
| Author: | resident [ Sat Apr 30, 2011 8:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetim |
Bradley Witherberry wrote: 2D movies are already in 3D as far as our brains are concerned - - Cameron's talking about this fakoid stereoscopy they keep trying to pawn off on us as "3D". It's time for the rubes to wake up. Well no...but would you agree that a true holographic system might be desirable sometime in the future? And if not, then why not? |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetim |
I think James Cameron is gonna die pretty soon then. |
|
| Author: | resident [ Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetim |
Chippy wrote: I think James Cameron is gonna die pretty soon then. Are you from The Collection Agency? I agree that I'm not crazy...about fixed parallax 3D. I'd love to see a system like holography that allows for a natural sense of focus and depth, but I appreciate that others may disagree. The ultimate system would allow collapsing the view digitally to a flat 2D latency like conventional media, or turning it up for a surround mode experience. |
|
| Author: | Thegun [ Sat Apr 30, 2011 9:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetim |
Glassless 3d already exists, its called sight |
|
| Author: | Rev [ Sat Apr 30, 2011 10:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetim |
Thegun wrote: Glassless 3d already exists, its called sight James Cameron, give me sight beyond sight!
|
|
| Author: | Bradley Witherberry [ Sun May 01, 2011 6:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetim |
resident wrote: Bradley Witherberry wrote: 2D movies are already in 3D as far as our brains are concerned - - Cameron's talking about this fakoid stereoscopy they keep trying to pawn off on us as "3D". It's time for the rubes to wake up. Well no...but would you agree that a true holographic system might be desirable sometime in the future? And if not, then why not? Absolutely - - bring it on! I hope to see theatre scale high resolution holographic "movies" in my lifetime. Even if they could make a glassless 3D film on a 2D screen - - who cares? It's still an unnecessarily artificial stereoscopic illusion, not 3D. |
|
| Author: | resident [ Tue May 03, 2011 10:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetim |
Bradley Witherberry wrote: resident wrote: Bradley Witherberry wrote: 2D movies are already in 3D as far as our brains are concerned - - Cameron's talking about this fakoid stereoscopy they keep trying to pawn off on us as "3D". It's time for the rubes to wake up. Well no...but would you agree that a true holographic system might be desirable sometime in the future? And if not, then why not? Absolutely - - bring it on! I hope to see theatre scale high resolution holographic "movies" in my lifetime. Even if they could make a glassless 3D film on a 2D screen - - who cares? It's still an unnecessarily artificial stereoscopic illusion, not 3D. Ahh! Now I feel better. Well...off to work then... |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Wed May 04, 2011 3:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetim |
Anyone who knows anything about technology knows that it is advancing at an exponential rate. We're living in golden times, people! |
|
| Author: | Thegun [ Wed May 04, 2011 4:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetim |
Chippy wrote: Anyone who knows anything about technology knows that it is advancing at an exponential rate. We're living in golden times, people! That's what they said in the early 1900s too. Times are never golden, there just better then what they were the decade before, unless your the 1930s. |
|
| Author: | resident [ Thu May 05, 2011 11:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: James Cameron Doesn't Expect Glassless 3D in His Lifetim |
Chippy wrote: Anyone who knows anything about technology knows that it is advancing at an exponential rate. We're living in golden times, people! And we also have the advantage/possibility of using digital projectors projecting sub data from different angles..who knows? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|