World of KJ :: View topic

Munkpool wrote:

This thread is better

Monsieur Marin wrote:

Um, if it is about a flaming gay character and it's cited for "graphic sexual content" or whatever, I would assume that means graphic gay sex. Something I don't think all the guys who loved Borat will be a huge fan of.

Monsieur Marin wrote:

Libs wrote:

Monsieur Marin wrote:

Borat had a nearly 5-minute long graphically naked wrestling scene, I doubt that many people who loved Borat would be that sensitive about it.

Monsieur Marin wrote:

the fucked perspective of 20 year old heterosexual males.

loyalfromlondon wrote:

Monsieur Marin wrote:

the fucked perspective of 20 year old heterosexual males.

Why is their perspective fucked?

Monsieur Marin wrote:

loyalfromlondon wrote:

Monsieur Marin wrote:

the fucked perspective of 20 year old heterosexual males.

Why is their perspective fucked?

Because they think lesbians fucking is totally hot but gay men fucking is the nastiest thing in the world. Cause they think 2 completely naked straight guys fighting and wrestling is totally hilarious, but make an exact duplicate of that scene with two guys that are said to be gay and they'll hate it.
I am, obviously, talking in generalities. Some of them are perfectly logical people that aren't douches, but in majority, yeah, that's fucked up.

loyalfromlondon wrote:

Monsieur Marin wrote:

loyalfromlondon wrote:

Monsieur Marin wrote:

the fucked perspective of 20 year old heterosexual males.

Why is their perspective fucked?

You could probably make the same argument for heterosexual girls and guys of many age groups though.

And I'm sure there are some homosexual girls and guys that find straight sex disgusting. Hell, I've read comments along those lines in this very forum.

Monsieur Marin wrote:

Author:	Chippy [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 3:59 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
This thread is better

Author:	Libs [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:25 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
Munkpool wrote: This thread is better But anyway, you win this time Magnus. I will have my revenge in the future, though! Watch outttt

Author:	Loyal [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 4:31 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
I would be more concerned if it got a R rating out the gate.

Author:	Michael A [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:38 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
Um, if it is about a flaming gay character and it's cited for "graphic sexual content" or whatever, I would assume that means graphic gay sex. Something I don't think all the guys who loved Borat will be a huge fan of.

Author:	Loyal [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
Monsieur Marin wrote: Um, if it is about a flaming gay character and it's cited for "graphic sexual content" or whatever, I would assume that means graphic gay sex. Something I don't think all the guys who loved Borat will be a huge fan of. If its played for comedy, why not? Gay, straight, funny sexual situations are funny sexual situations.

World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/

Bruno = NC-17 http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=50199	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Libs [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 5:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
Monsieur Marin wrote: Um, if it is about a flaming gay character and it's cited for "graphic sexual content" or whatever, I would assume that means graphic gay sex. Something I don't think all the guys who loved Borat will be a huge fan of. Borat had a nearly 5-minute long graphically naked wrestling scene, I doubt that many people who loved Borat would be that sensitive about it.

Author:	Michael A [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:06 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
Libs wrote: Monsieur Marin wrote: Um, if it is about a flaming gay character and it's cited for "graphic sexual content" or whatever, I would assume that means graphic gay sex. Something I don't think all the guys who loved Borat will be a huge fan of. Borat had a nearly 5-minute long graphically naked wrestling scene, I doubt that many people who loved Borat would be that sensitive about it. Yes, but it wasn't "gay", at least not from the fucked perspective of 20 year old heterosexual males, it was all just a "joke" and while this will be too, it's "gays" that are not doing it. Not guys who are in love with Pamela Anderson. So it could be a lot worse in the aforementioned fucked up perspective.

Author:	Loyal [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:08 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
Monsieur Marin wrote: the fucked perspective of 20 year old heterosexual males. Why is their perspective fucked?

Author:	Michael A [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:11 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
loyalfromlondon wrote: Monsieur Marin wrote: the fucked perspective of 20 year old heterosexual males. Why is their perspective fucked? Because they think lesbians fucking is totally hot but gay men fucking is the nastiest thing in the world. Cause they think 2 completely naked straight guys fighting and wrestling is totally hilarious, but make an exact duplicate of that scene with two guys that are said to be gay and they'll hate it. I am, obviously, talking in generalities. Some of them are perfectly logical people that aren't douches, but in majority, yeah, that's fucked up.

Author:	Loyal [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 6:14 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
Monsieur Marin wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Monsieur Marin wrote: the fucked perspective of 20 year old heterosexual males. Why is their perspective fucked? Because they think lesbians fucking is totally hot but gay men fucking is the nastiest thing in the world. Cause they think 2 completely naked straight guys fighting and wrestling is totally hilarious, but make an exact duplicate of that scene with two guys that are said to be gay and they'll hate it. I am, obviously, talking in generalities. Some of them are perfectly logical people that aren't douches, but in majority, yeah, that's fucked up. You could probably make the same argument for heterosexual girls and guys of many age groups though. And I'm sure there are some homosexual girls and guys that find straight sex disgusting. Hell, I've read comments along those lines in this very forum.

Author:	Michael A [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 9:42 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
loyalfromlondon wrote: Monsieur Marin wrote: loyalfromlondon wrote: Monsieur Marin wrote: the fucked perspective of 20 year old heterosexual males. Why is their perspective fucked? Because they think lesbians fucking is totally hot but gay men fucking is the nastiest thing in the world. Cause they think 2 completely naked straight guys fighting and wrestling is totally hilarious, but make an exact duplicate of that scene with two guys that are said to be gay and they'll hate it. I am, obviously, talking in generalities. Some of them are perfectly logical people that aren't douches, but in majority, yeah, that's fucked up. You could probably make the same argument for heterosexual girls and guys of many age groups though. And I'm sure there are some homosexual girls and guys that find straight sex disgusting. Hell, I've read comments along those lines in this very forum. Yeah, that exists, but because "heterosexuality" is so...mainstream, it's hard to really have a problem with it, even if you want to. Of all the people I know, the only group that USUALLY says they are grossed out by the sex they are not attracted doing sexual activity, is straight, young males.

Author:	MadGez [ Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:28 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
Straight guys like two woman going at it because it turns them on. Two guys going at it doesnt. I dont think thats a f_cked perspective at all. In a business sense, it could go either way (depending whats in the film) but attracting the majority straight audience makes more sense. Im glad this got an NC-17 on first cut. Its going to have a HUGE opening weekend so total will be good regardless of legs.

Author:	Thegun [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:29 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
Bruno is an awful character, no where near as funny, marketable or interesting as Borat. It'll probably open to 20 million, but then crash and burn.

Author:	Magic Mike [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:41 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
Monsieur Marin wrote: Um, if it is about a flaming gay character and it's cited for "graphic sexual content" or whatever, I would assume that means graphic gay sex. Something I don't think all the guys who loved Borat will be a huge fan of. It doesn't even necessarily mean it's going to be gay sex. I could see an over-the-top scene of it thrown in for laughs, but that's about it. You could argue that Borat had one . I mean, I know people who were just as disgusted by that (hilarious) scene and labeled it "gay." Besides, a lot of those people who would be offended by this movie probably won't go and see it. It's not like it will be hidden that this character is a flaming homosexual.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	paper [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 9:57 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Bruno = NC-17
An article in Time basically states the main reason for NC-17 being a scene of seemingly graphic anal sex with another man. It's actually a stupid article if you read it, it keeps making the MPAA and Bruno's initial rating appear to be this huge deal, but then admits in its last paragraph, like we all already know, that the studio will obviously get it trimmed to an R and that Bruno will be immensely popular in its "Unrated" version on DVD, no harm, no foul. It's a waste of an article.