| World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| U.S. Ratings For 2005 Movies http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=4941 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Spidey [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 3:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | U.S. Ratings For 2005 Movies |
This thread is for the U.S. ratings of 2005 movies by the MPAA. RATED R 01. Assault on Precinct 13 02. Hide and Seek 03. Alone in the Dark 04. Constantine 05. The Jacket 06. Hostage RATED PG-13 01. White Noise 02. Coach Carter 03. Elektra 04. In Good Company 05. Boogeyman 06. The Wedding Date 07. Hitch 08. Cursed 09. Man of the House 10. Diary of A Mad Black Woman 11. Be Cool RATED PG 01. Racing Stripes 02. Are We There Yet? 03. Son of the Mask 04. Because of Winn-Dixie 05. The Pacifier 06. Robots RATED G 01. Pooh's Heffalump Movie This is for wide releases and it is just to see how many of each rating are released in 2005. Movies are added when they are released. |
|
| Author: | Algren [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 3:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Good idea. This can also show trends. :wink: |
|
| Author: | Algren [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 3:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: U.S. Ratings For 2005 Movies |
Spiderman2005 wrote: RATED PG-13 05. Boogeyman 08. Cursed Quite suprised these are PG-13. Thought the movies would have had an 'R' rating.....although it stands to reason, because all this world cares about nowadays is money. I SAY BRING BACK GOOD MOVIES AND FORGET ABOUT MONEY!! :wink: |
|
| Author: | zingy [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 3:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
If only the world worked that way, Algren. Directors think about quality over money (well, some of them). The companies are the ones that will destroy a movie. I think Cursed would have done better with the R-rating. It didn't do good as a PG-13. Money will always be more important to companies. |
|
| Author: | Algren [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 3:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Yeh true. |
|
| Author: | teenman [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 4:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I don't know who's the most responsible for the damage of horror movies (or films that are marketed as 'horror') anymore, and I don't want to know at all. No offense, but it's all of our and their faults and responsibilites for every situation situated, especially MPAA, filmmakers, companies, and us moviegoers. No matter who's fault it is the most, it is the fault of us and them for everything that's been dealt with. So go ahead and send me hate messages if you feel like it |
|
| Author: | Algren [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 6:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I see what you are saying 'want2write', because if we pay for horror films that are rated PG-13, then we are sort of saying "yes please, we want more" .... so it is our fault, indirectly. But its the studio's fault initially because they are the one's that order the cutting of more voilent scenes. |
|
| Author: | teenman [ Sat Feb 26, 2005 9:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Algren wrote: I see what you are saying 'want2write', because if we pay for horror films that are rated PG-13, then we are sort of saying "yes please, we want more" .... so it is our fault, indirectly. But its the studio's fault initially because they are the one's that order the cutting of more voilent scenes. |
|
| Author: | Spidey [ Mon Feb 28, 2005 12:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Updated with the March 4th releases!! |
|
| Author: | Schlomo [ Mon Feb 28, 2005 1:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Just wondering, what were the ratings of the three Scream movies? |
|
| Author: | teenman [ Mon Feb 28, 2005 3:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Schlomo wrote: Just wondering, what were the ratings of the three Scream movies? |
|
| Author: | Kris K [ Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Ooooh, i thought HIDE AND SEEK was PG13 all this time. Just WHITE NOISE, BOOGEYMAN and CURSED then? |
|
| Author: | Spidey [ Sun Mar 06, 2005 4:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Updated |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|