I'd say that McAdams is in it for the long run. One of those actresses that are never quite totally flashy and upfront (like, em, Lindsay Lohan), but who are consistent.
I love her oh so much
| World of KJ http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/ |
|
| Do people still think... http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=33182 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Excel [ Sun Jul 29, 2007 3:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | Do people still think... |
rachel mcadams is gonna be trhe next huge female star? she probably regrets turning down the devil wears prada, though i think shes smart for staying from franchise films like the dark knight, fantastic four, get smart, ect. That said...no films since 05; and the ones she has coming out arent exactly mainstream. she is however only 28; so she still has time. but i guess shes still looking for her pretty woman. what do you guys think? |
|
| Author: | Chippy [ Sun Jul 29, 2007 3:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I think she's hot. Isn't that all that matters? |
|
| Author: | Mr. Inc [ Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Shes hot and I love her, and I think she may a great pressence of doing almost every genre all at once so she could get almost any fan of thriller/romance/comedy/drama. Did she do to much to soon? Maybe, and maybe itll backfire, but she did enough that she is still in peoples minds. |
|
| Author: | Major Malfunction [ Sun Jul 29, 2007 11:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
As long as she continues to make quality movies, her fan base will grow with every picture. Many people weren't huge right away. Christian Bale and Paul Giamatti come to mind. Both have been around awhile before Batman and Sideways came along for them. |
|
| Author: | thompsoncory [ Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
She'll be fine. |
|
| Author: | Libs [ Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
She's making movies that likely reflect advancing her craft (like The Return) rather than trying to becoming a huge mainstream star. That said, though, The Time Traveler's Wife could very well be the next Notebook. The book is wonderfully romantic (and best-selling and popular), and it begins shooting in September, probably meaning the studio is planning on a June/July 2008 release (just like The Notebook had). |
|
| Author: | Box [ Sun Jul 29, 2007 12:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I'd say that McAdams is in it for the long run. One of those actresses that are never quite totally flashy and upfront (like, em, Lindsay Lohan), but who are consistent. I love her oh so much
|
|
| Author: | Major Malfunction [ Sun Jul 29, 2007 1:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Homer Box wrote: I'd say that McAdams is in it for the long run. One of those actresses that are never quite totally flashy and upfront (like, em, Lindsay Lohan), but who are consistent. I love her oh so much Agreed, she'll be fine as long as she doesn't start acting like a lunatic 
|
|
| Author: | Ripper [ Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Many successful people in Hollywood turned big roles. As many have stated, she seems more interested in a long term career, then stardom, mabe she prefers working but with a quieter personal life. She not getting the media frenzy of Lohan or other young ir girls, that has to be nice, to still work and have some sense of privacy. |
|
| Author: | trixster [ Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Magnus wrote: She's quiet down, but she'll come back strong. Though I think she still should have taken the role of Pepper in Iron Man as having one mainstream big movie always helps. She'd be locked into the trilogy, though. Didn't Paltrow sign a three picture deal? |
|
| Author: | Excel [ Mon Aug 06, 2007 2:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Do people still think... |
yeah; but paltros lucky to already be famous yet not bankable AT ALL... Buit shes VERY smart in avoiding major franchise roles... look where kirsten dunst was headed pre spiderman (budding star) and now look where she is. That did margot kidder do post superman? The way to become a HUGE star ala the likes of Jim Carrey, Tom Cruise, Tom Hanks, or Julia Roberts is not to have one huge role that makes you super famous, like what was supposed to happen to hayden christensen or brandon routh (though Routh should actually have some sort of a career, as he looks both looks and talent and thus far, a good rep); but rather you get famous by taking a sling of roles in smaller films and making do well. McAdams did that with 5 films in 04-05, but 06 and 07 have been empty. If she can get another string like that, shell be a big player. DYK: Speaking potential superstar, highly touted TYRESE GIBSON picked up a cool 8 million bucks for his 15 minutes of screen time in Transformers; or more than labuff, duhamel or fox, made combined. Good agent, or next Will Smith? U think the latter 
|
|
| Author: | Korrgan [ Mon Aug 06, 2007 3:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Do people still think... |
Excel wrote: The way to become a HUGE star ala the likes of Jim Carrey, Tom Cruise, Tom Hanks, or Julia Roberts is not to have one huge role that makes you super famous  Julia was practically no one before Pretty Woman. That made her a big star. Kirsten Dunst's career went no where after Spider-Man because everyone realized with the SM series that she, for the most part, is a horrid actress.
|
|
| Author: | Bradley Witherberry [ Mon Aug 06, 2007 8:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: |
Major Malfunction wrote: As long as she continues to make quality movies, her fan base will grow with every picture. Many people weren't huge right away. Christian Bale and Paul Giamatti come to mind. Both have been around awhile before Batman and Sideways came along for them. The key difference here is that they are dudes (eg: the wierder and older Giammatti looks the more work he'll get) -- female actresses for right or wrong have a very limited shelf life, and are pretty much toast by the time they're 40. Look at how disrespectfully media (or Wokjer's) treats Sharon Stone or Demi Moore, let alone producers no longer hiring them. That being said, I agree with many of the comments here that being selective and not doing random superhero dreck is a good move -- and Ii was especially happy to hear Libs news that she'll be doing Time Traveller's Wife -- I've only heard great things about the novel, and have held off reading it specifically to wait to see the movie version first... |
|
| Author: | Ripper [ Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Re: |
Bradley Witherberry wrote: Major Malfunction wrote: As long as she continues to make quality movies, her fan base will grow with every picture. Many people weren't huge right away. Christian Bale and Paul Giamatti come to mind. Both have been around awhile before Batman and Sideways came along for them. The key difference here is that they are dudes (eg: the wierder and older Giammatti looks the more work he'll get) -- female actresses for right or wrong have a very limited shelf life, and are pretty much toast by the time they're 40. Look at how disrespectfully media (or Wokjer's) treats Sharon Stone or Demi Moore, let alone producers no longer hiring them. That being said, I agree with many of the comments here that being selective and not doing random superhero dreck is a good move -- and Ii was especially happy to hear Libs news that she'll be doing Time Traveller's Wife -- I've only heard great things about the novel, and have held off reading it specifically to wait to see the movie version first... Good point with Demi and Stone, but both were playing some roels were looks were an issue. Other actresses liek Meryl Streep, Lily Tomlin, Susan Sarandon, have ocnintued to work later in life. I think McAdams may never be a Julia Roberts type, but more an actor lieksay Holly HUnter who just keeps getting work, people know her name, but there are not 8000 photos of her on the internet. I don't see McAdams being the next It girl and followed around everywehre she goes, but being more of a consistent presence. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|