World of KJ
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/

SHOCKING NEWS: Night at the Musuem 2 is coming
http://www.worldofkj.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=29241		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  MARVEL_ROCKS [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:28 am ]
Post subject: 
That was inevitable since NATM made so much money. Hell it beat a pixar flick & superman.

But something tells me it won't do as much as NATM. Well actually we have to wait for dvd sales first and then see when the flick will release.
Author:  Korrgan [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 1:30 am ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
"Or, Seagal’s doing a lecture on safety with Koala bears and then gets face-raped!”


Please. Oh pretty please!!


And... whee I guess. NATM was kinda cute, my niece loved it.
Author:  BJ [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:07 am ]
Post subject: 
fucking hell
Author:  Skyblade [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 2:29 am ]
Post subject: 
But at least this means 2009 will be awesome with the moneymaking. Right? Right?
Author:  Jim Halpert [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:18 am ]
Post subject: 
masn tu can fufkscn taht shit mo9ther ucker
Author:  BJ [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 3:39 am ]
Post subject: 
Jayhawk wrote:
masn tu can fufkscn taht shit mo9ther ucker


WHAT THE FUCK!
Author:  TDH [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 7:56 am ]
Post subject: 
Hahaha, looks like he was drunk.
Author:  Jim Halpert [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:06 am ]
Post subject: 
i do not remember making that post.
Author:  Lost Ultimatum [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 6:39 pm ]
Post subject: 
Dear god say it isn't so. :sad:

Damn you Stiller and all those involved with this movie, damn you all to HELL!!!!!
Author:  matatonio [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 7:04 pm ]
Post subject: 
well... it was fun but it really didnt doesnt need a sequel. oh well, ill see it.
Author:  BJ [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:36 pm ]
Post subject: 
matatonio wrote:
well... it was fun but it really didnt doesnt need a sequel. oh well, ill see it.


:ohmy:
Author:  Gulli [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:49 pm ]
Post subject: 
The first one was about as enjoyable as stuffing my trucks with Rabies infected Scorpions. I'll be passing.
Author:  Biggestgeekever [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 8:53 pm ]
Post subject: 
Gullimont wrote:
The first one was about as enjoyable as stuffing my trucks with Rabies infected Scorpions. I'll be passing.
I'd guess you meant "trunks" there, but will all those weird euro-expressions like fag, I don't really want to.
Author:  Gulli [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:13 pm ]
Post subject: 
Biggestgeekever wrote:
Gullimont wrote:
The first one was about as enjoyable as stuffing my trucks with Rabies infected Scorpions. I'll be passing.
I'd guess you meant "trunks" there, but will all those weird euro-expressions like fag, I don't really want to.


Damn you Geek!
Author:  Squee [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:18 pm ]
Post subject: 
Gullimont wrote:
Biggestgeekever wrote:
Gullimont wrote:
The first one was about as enjoyable as stuffing my trucks with Rabies infected Scorpions. I'll be passing.
I'd guess you meant "trunks" there, but will all those weird euro-expressions like fag, I don't really want to.


Damn you Geek!


I can't believe you would rather have everyone know that you made a typo instead of trying to get everyone to believe that you were rich and had several trucks that you could stuff with rabies infected scorpions.
Author:  Gulli [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:24 pm ]
Post subject: 
Squee wrote:
Gullimont wrote:
Biggestgeekever wrote:
Gullimont wrote:
The first one was about as enjoyable as stuffing my trucks with Rabies infected Scorpions. I'll be passing.
I'd guess you meant "trunks" there, but will all those weird euro-expressions like fag, I don't really want to.


Damn you Geek!


I can't believe you would rather have everyone know that you made a typo instead of trying to get everyone to believe that you were rich and had several trucks that you could stuff with rabies infected scorpions.


................I mean I revealed the existence of my massive trucks by accident which i hadn't planned to.

aHA a grammatical victory over the devious Librarian.
Author:  Biggestgeekever [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:27 pm ]
Post subject: 
Gullimont wrote:
Squee wrote:
Gullimont wrote:
Biggestgeekever wrote:
Gullimont wrote:
The first one was about as enjoyable as stuffing my trucks with Rabies infected Scorpions. I'll be passing.
I'd guess you meant "trunks" there, but will all those weird euro-expressions like fag, I don't really want to.


Damn you Geek!


I can't believe you would rather have everyone know that you made a typo instead of trying to get everyone to believe that you were rich and had several trucks that you could stuff with rabies infected scorpions.


................I mean I revealed the existence of my massive trucks by accident which i hadn't planned to.

aHA a grammatical victory over the devious Librarian.
Oh, go smoke a fag you!
Author:  Gulli [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 9:37 pm ]
Post subject: 
Biggestgeekever wrote:
Gullimont wrote:
Squee wrote:
Gullimont wrote:
Biggestgeekever wrote:
Gullimont wrote:
The first one was about as enjoyable as stuffing my trucks with Rabies infected Scorpions. I'll be passing.
I'd guess you meant "trunks" there, but will all those weird euro-expressions like fag, I don't really want to.


Damn you Geek!


I can't believe you would rather have everyone know that you made a typo instead of trying to get everyone to believe that you were rich and had several trucks that you could stuff with rabies infected scorpions.


................I mean I revealed the existence of my massive trucks by accident which i hadn't planned to.

aHA a grammatical victory over the devious Librarian.
Oh, go smoke a fag you!


:sad:
Author:  Darth Indiana Bond [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:04 pm ]
Post subject: 
matatonio wrote:
well... it was fun but it really didnt doesnt need a sequel. oh well, ill see it.


My thoughts. It was a good old film, but it wasn't near amazing or even half great, and producers need to learn to leave films alone.
Author:  BJ [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:28 pm ]
Post subject: 
Darth Indiana Bond wrote:
matatonio wrote:
well... it was fun but it really didnt doesnt need a sequel. oh well, ill see it.


My thoughts. It was a good old film, but it wasn't near amazing or even half great, and producers need to learn to leave films alone.


yeah right :hahaha:
Author:  O [ Fri Apr 13, 2007 11:45 pm ]
Post subject: 
I'm surprised it took this long to even get a mention of a sequel. It will be very, very difficult to get the legs of this one, but with inflation, even if it drops 25% in admissions, it'll still do $200 m + by then. It is Fox's 3rd biggest film EVER outside of SW, so you can't blame them for the sequel. And they haven't made a sequel to ID4, and Home Alone has already had enough sequels, so they could pull 2 more films from this I think. I just hope they don't make the same mistake that I feel Narnia is making, by switching to the summer. I just have a gut feeling that Narnia 2 will do $100 m more with a winter release, than a summer one. Oh well...
Author:  Mr. Inc [ Sat Apr 14, 2007 12:15 am ]
Post subject: 
A sequel is obvious. Anyways, I enjoyed NATM, very fun and entertaining, and rewatchable but instead of making a sequel that will most likely suck, make something original, and fun and entertaining..just like the first.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/